User talk:Sarah
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Joanna Murray-Smith
Hi Sarah just new to editing. I looked up "Joanna Murray-Smith", one of Australia's foremost contemporary playwrights and found no entry. I decided to try and write one and noticed a previous article on her had been deleted. I can't ascertain why it was deleted and rather than re-invent the wheel I wondered if it could be revived and edited to fix the problem (lack of citation possibly?). Sorry for being a newbie, best regards grant —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freman53 (talk • contribs) 05:50, August 26, 2007 (UTC)
Your comments at my talk page
Well, IF it is true that my behavior is blockoble for being disruptive, then your behavior is also blockable because it's also disruptive. How is your behavior disruptive? You have defended abuse of power by other administrators and claim it is justified, based on your misunderstanding of wikipedia deletion policy. You have made statements as an administrator without understanding your own policies, and in fact, you don't know the wikipedia delete policy, do you? I put up a hangon link, and I added relevant information to the talk page about the notability. I also (later) addressed the relevance on other administrator's pages, and in the deletion review. You and your fellow administrators screwed up first, and now you're making it worse by not confessing & atoning.
Now that I've done the research, I've learned that your organization has behaved the same way with hundreds, thousands, other editors. You may be in growing pains. You might grow out of it by having two levels of wikipedia pages: "fully authorized" and "tentative". You administrators would not behave in such a childish manner with the tentative pages, instead you could all focus on being the "first one" to "maintain the accountability" of your organization by policing the "fully authorized" pages. You could let the people who actually know something focus on adding "tentative" pages, that would appear in the search, but would have a "tentative" notation until they were around for several months & reached a higher level of editing quality.
Your destiny up to your organization. I think it's likely that if you don't grow up, we will desert you. Peterchristopher 10:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)