User talk:HongQiGong

If you leave a message here, I will reply here.
If I leave a message at your Talk page, please reply there - I'll have it on my watchlist.

Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs)

Archives

Archive 1: 2006-02-26 - 2006-08-29

Archive 2: 2006-08-30 - 2006-12-28

Archive 3: 2006-12-28 - 2007-02-26

Archive 4: 2007-02-26 - 2007-05-07

Archive 5: 2007-05-11 - 2007-07-20

Archive 6: 2007-07-21 - 2007-08-21

rabota

Hey Hong, Rabota (or his socks) says he made the video, also he probably made the "fake (sic) of nanking video too. The same conclusion can also be drawn from his first user page [1] edit, as tamagawaboat is the guy who made the nanking video from youtube. His blog is a jap right wing apologist site, with ludicrous claims like japan fought nazis in china [2]. We should bring this to light, as the pictures the socks have uploaded not only violates copyright, but also smell strongly of original research as evidenced from these shitty websites. Also, the request for checkuser came back as "possible". However, if you go to User:MUSASHIKOGANEI's youtube page, you'd see that he is "tamagawaboat", as his original tamagawaboat youtube account has been suspended. User:Rabota is very likely the same person as User:MUSASHIKOGANEI and Tamagawaboat, based on his user page edit and a serious of reverts [3], [4], [5] evading my questioning whether he's tamagawaboat or not. Tamagawaboat is pretty famous for his original fake of nanking video and he seems to have visited many websites and blogs posting his rhetoric, especially in response to Ted Leonis's new Nanking documentary that's airing at the end of this year. Blueshirts 04:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hong, rabota sent me this video. Do you know how to report this to wiki admins? Thanks. Blueshirts 17:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. Maybe try reporting to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents? Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 18:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of British Chinese people

Newbie here. Read your contribution to the Nomination of for deletion for a similar list in the US. Now they are proposing another Mass Deletion of Ethnic List. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_British_Chinese_people

Do you think there is anyway that some kind of permanant policy can be established once and for all? Thanks. Chineseartlover 19:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. There is actually a proposed guideline for this issue. Take a look at Wikipedia:Proposed guideline for lists of people by ethnicity, religion, and other cultural categorizations. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Wiki is getting too big and people are repaeting all the arguments without realising it :) Chineseartlover 19:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_British_Asian_people concluded as "No consensus, defaulting to Keep". Yet similar AFD for Chinese in UK resulted in "deletion". I wonder if you might be interested to contribute to the following discussion? Thanks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_August_25#List_of_British_Chinese_people Chineseartlover 19:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manzanar FAC

When you get some time, feel free to add your support for the Manzanar FAC! Gmatsuda 07:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Things are still going slowly. As of now, it looks like it's going to fail due to lack of interest, which is really quite sad. Hope you put in your two cents on the Manzanar FAC soon! -- Gmatsuda 07:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		HongQiGong...thanks for your contributions to Manzanar, especially when we were "embroiled" in that debate over terminology. You helped put us back on track and look what happened...it's now an FA. Thanks again! -- Gmatsuda 22:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one that really deserves the praise for putting that article together. It's really a great article. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

I just wanted to thank you for your cooperation and ask you a question. I'm a journalist and need the info for style purposes.

My doubt is: When you refer to something, let's say a movie, from New York in an international context, you say it's an American movie. But when you speak about something from Hong Kong in an international context, should you say it is something Chinese (since HK is now again a part of the PR) or something Hongkonian, due to the special rule of this territory? Thanks. --Damifb 18:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Minzu

I noticed that you redirected Minzu to Zhonghua minzu. Would you mind explaining your thinking on the talk page please? That seems the best place for discussion. Matt 18:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ethics

You've been persistently publishing on Wikipedia an unofficial map, which depicts the territories of other countries as part of China's territory. I understand all your love to China. If you love your country, please respect her neighbours too. Please don't cover your neighbours' yards in the map of your yard. I don't see anything hurting the ROC POV in the more official map I have suggested. Moreover, the map I suggested respects the POV of the Russian Federation, Mongolia, India and so on, without offending the POV of PRC, ROC, HK, Macao etc. :) Gantuya eng 03:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We've been telling you over and over again - that article is not about the PRC. It's about "China". We can't use the PRC flag for an article that's not about the PRC. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear HongQiGong, May I ask you to be more polite. Please do not turn my talk page into a theatre of edit war with your repeated "warning" signs. They scare me. Gantuya eng 03:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is necessary to warn people who are in risk of violating WP:3RR. Please read about that policy. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rply to email; will send some files

..may be useful... later! --Ling.Nut 02:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

..but in order for me to help with sources, you need to reply to my email. Wikipedia mail does not permit attachments, so I'll have to attach the files to your reply. Ling.Nut 04:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Duh. :-p Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 07:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rape of Nanking FAC

I'm really sorry, but I've been hard at work on another article and just didn't get a chance to look at that FAC and don't think I'll be able to get to it, since I have some travel pending. Good luck with it ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Son Goku Saiyuki

If you disagree that Son Goku is part of the Saiyuki manga series, please remove the reference from List of main characters from Saiyuki and propose the redirect Son Goku (Saiyuki) for deletion. Failing that, it should be on the disambiguation page and there's no reason to remove it. Thanks. -- JHunterJ 02:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chinese Foo Dog

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chinese Foo Dog, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Foo Dog. Thank you. Evb-wiki 14:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deletion nominations for ethnic group lists

Hi,

I see you've commented on a number of these deletion discussions that have just come up for ethnic-group people lists. Having all of these come up at once is problematic, I think, so I left a message at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents see "Mass deletion nominations for List of [Ethnic Group X] Americans". You may want to follow that or comment there. Noroton 00:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Miles AFD

I noticed the arguments there, but I determined that the delete ones had a lot more weight. If you disagree (btw. you might want to check the deletion summary too), request a review. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 06:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. I was neutral to the deletion, but I thought that the AfD itself should have resulted in no consensus. I don't feel strongly about it either way. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 06:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting a mistaken impression

After seeing your edit summary here, I wanted to clear a minor issue up. Please don't assume that because Kurt Leyman broke the three revert rule and was blocked, therefore his edit was 'wrong'. I have no particular opinion about the content of the edit; the three revert rule is about editor behaviour and not content. The fact that an editor is blocked under the rule does not mean that other editors can freely revert their changes without discussion or sanction if they are continuing an edit dispute. Sam Blacketer 15:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Faye Wong

Hi, please be careful with what you delete. On the Faye Wong article, while making your defensible WP:FLAGCRUFT edit, you also hacked out her birthplace.

Please edit with a scalpel, rather than with an axe!

-- Terry Carroll 15:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was about to add that back in and actually had an edit conflict with your edit. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

flags

Oh ok. Looks like lots of infoboxes are going to need some work... Pandacomics 19:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33-John Smith's

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33-John Smith's. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33-John Smith's/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Giovanni33-John Smith's/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 01:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Modern Chinese music. I didn't know I was violating any real flag kruft rule. Feel free to swing by that page. Benjwong 06:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nanking Massacre

Hi there. Do you think it would be a good idea to ask for an article review? I think this is an article that deserves attention - maybe with advice from neutral third parties it could get even better? John Smith's 22:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asian American citations

User:Iseebias would not have been able to walk all over the Asian American article if the citations I added from sociologists had been kept in the article. They agreed with the US Census. Can my citations be added back in?----^DarkTea© 14:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't your citations that was the problem, it was the fact that you completely re-hauled the article without discussion. But either way, I doubt those citations would convince Iseebias of anything. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please write an accurate article

Neo Gomanism Manifesto Special - On War - Please quote the part of Anti-Chinese sentiment in Japan. This book doesn't criticize China though there is a doubt of the history revisionism though I read this book. --KoreanShoriSenyou 15:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This book is a book that investigated the crime of the foreigner who lives in Japan. Please quote the part that relates to China if it relates to China.) Kyōgaku no Gaijin Hanzai Ura File - Gaijin Hanzai Hakusho 2007　--KoreanShoriSenyou 15:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 　[reply]

Reversion

Why did you revert this edit? My rationale was correct. Beijing has always been Beijing, its just that the Cantonese form of the word sounded like Peking so that is why English translators romanized it as that. Later, English translators decided to go with an interpretation that was closer to the Mandarin form of the word and thats why Beijing (past, present, and future) is now called Beijing in English. 128.227.143.54 00:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Image with Clear face in Korea War

Edit War Help! I don't expect you vote in the talk page as Chinese, but only vote in a good faith of fair person. Dongwenliang 04:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalsim edit from Grant65

Hello, i saw your discussion in Japanese_War_crime section. [6] Grant65 maybe vandalist. his edit is totally inappropriate in articel.[7] also, citaion is no relation, too. You and i are support to delete his edit. [8]. can you help me? how can i delete his vicious edit? Checkorder2 17:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]