Jump to content

An Inconvenient Truth

Listen to this article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sfgiants320 (talk | contribs) at 19:38, 13 October 2007 (→Influences on popular culture). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An Inconvenient Truth
File:Aninconvenienttruth.jpg
Promotional poster for An Inconvenient Truth
Directed byDavis Guggenheim
Produced byLawrence Bender
Scott Z. Burns
Laurie David
Lesley Chilcott (co-producer)
StarringAl Gore
Edited byJay Cassidy
Dan Swietlik
Music byMichael Brook
Distributed byParamount Classics
Release date
2006-05-24
Running time
94 min
CountryUSA
LanguageEnglish
BudgetUS$+1,000,000[1]
Box officeUS$49,047,567
(worldwide)

An Inconvenient Truth is an Academy Award-winning documentary film about climate change, specifically global warming, presented by former United States Vice President Al Gore and directed by Davis Guggenheim.[2] A companion book authored by Gore has been on the paperback nonfiction New York Times bestseller list since June 11 2006, reaching #1 on July 2 2006.[3]

The film premiered at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival and opened in New York and Los Angeles on May 24 2006. Earning $49 million at the box office worldwide, An Inconvenient Truth is the fourth-highest-grossing documentary film to date in the United States, after Fahrenheit 9/11, March of the Penguins and Sicko.[4] The film's distributor, Paramount Classics, is donating 5% of the box office receipts and Gore is donating all of his proceeds from the film to the Alliance for Climate Protection (of which Gore is both founder and chairman).[5] The film was released on DVD by Paramount Home Entertainment on November 21 2006. An Inconvenient Truth was well received by film critics, scientists, and politicians and won two Academy Awards. It is also being used in school science curricula around the world.[6] Global warming skeptics have criticized the film, calling it "exaggerated and erroneous".[7][8]

Synopsis

You look at that river gently flowing by. You notice the leaves rustling with the wind. You hear the birds; you hear the tree frogs. In the distance you hear a cow. You feel the grass. The mud gives a little bit on the river bank. It’s quiet; it’s peaceful. And all of a sudden, it’s a gear shift inside you. And it’s like taking a deep breath and going, 'Oh yeah, I forgot about this'.

— Al Gore in the opening monologue of An Inconvenient Truth

An Inconvenient Truth focuses on Al Gore and his travels in support of his efforts to educate the public about the severity of the climate crisis. Gore says, "I've been trying to tell this story for a long time and I feel as I've failed to get the message across." The film nearly follows a Keynote presentation (dubbed "the slideshow") that Gore presented throughout the world. It intersperses Gore's exploration of data and predictions regarding climate change and its potential for disaster with Gore's life story.

It weaves in events that changed his worldview, including his college education with early climate expert Roger Revelle at Harvard University, his sister's death from lung cancer, and his young son's near-fatal car accident. Throughout the film, Gore makes comments regarding his loss to George W. Bush in the 2000 United States presidential election. For comic effect, Gore also uses a clip from the Futurama episode "Crimes of the Hot" to explain global warming.

In the slideshow Gore reviews the scientific opinion on climate change, discusses the politics and economics of global warming, and describes the consequences he believes global climate change will produce if the amount of human-generated greenhouse gases are not significantly reduced in the very near future. A centerpoint of the film is his examination of the annual temperature and CO2 levels for the past 650,000 years in Antarctic ice core samples.

The film includes many segments intended to refute critics who say that global warming is unproven or that warming will be insignificant. For example, Gore discusses the possibility of the collapse of a major ice sheet in Greenland or in West Antarctica, either of which could raise global sea levels by approximately 20 feet (6m), flooding coastal areas and producing 100 million refugees. Meltwater from Greenland, because of its lower salinity, could then halt the Gulf Stream current and quickly trigger dramatic local cooling in Northern Europe. The documentary ends with Gore arguing that if appropriate actions are taken soon, the effects of global warming can be successfully reversed by releasing less CO2 and planting more vegetation to consume existing CO2. Gore calls upon his viewers to learn how they can help him in these efforts.

Gore's book of the same title was published concurrently with the theatrical release of the documentary. The book contains additional information, scientific analysis, and Gore's commentary on the issues presented in the documentary. A 2007 documentary entitled An Update with Former Vice President Al Gore features Gore discussing additional information that came to light after the film was completed, such as Hurricane Katrina.[9]

Scientific basis

Main articles: Scientific opinion on climate change, Global warming, and Global warming controversy
The Pale Blue Dot, a Voyager 1 photo showing Earth (circled) as a single pixel from 4 billion miles (6.4 billion kilometres) away, is featured in An Inconvenient Truth. Al Gore points out that all of human history has happened on that tiny pixel, which is our only home.

Gore's claim is that global warming is real and largely human-caused. Gore presents specific data that supports the film's thesis, including:

The Associated Press contacted more than 100 climate researchers and questioned them about the film's veracity. All 19 climate scientists who had seen the movie said that Gore conveyed the science correctly.[12] In contrast, the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, at the time chaired by Republican Senator Jim Inhofe issued a press release criticizing this article.[13] Inhofe's statement that "global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people"[14] appears in the film.

RealClimate, a group blog maintained by eleven climate scientists, lauded the film's science as "remarkably up to date, with reference to some of the very latest research."[15] Michael Shermer, scientific author and founder of The Skeptics Society, wrote in Scientific American that An Inconvenient Truth "shocked me out of my doubting stance".[16]

Origins

Gore became intrigued by the topic of global warming when he took a course at Harvard University with Professor Roger Revelle, one of the first scientists to measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[17] Later, when Gore was in Congress, he initiated the first congressional hearing on the subject, brought in climate scientists and began talking to politicians about the issue.[18] He thought that once legislators heard the compelling evidence, they would be driven to action; ultimately, though, the process was a slow one. Gore's 1992 book, Earth in the Balance, dealing with a number of environmental topics, reached the New York Times bestseller list.

As Vice President during the Clinton Administration, Gore pushed for the implementation of a carbon tax to modify incentives to reduce fossil fuel consumption causing fossil fuel to last longer and thereby decrease emission of greenhouse gases in the short term but not long term; it was partially implemented in 1993. He helped broker the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty designed to curb greenhouse gas emissions. However, it was not ratified in the United States due to opposition, in the Senate. The primary objections stemmed from the exemptions the treaty gives to China and India, whose industrial base and carbon footprint are growing rapidly, and fears that the exemptions would lead to further trade imbalances and offshoring arrangement with those countries.

Gore also supported the funding of a satellite called Triana, to increase awareness of environmental issues and to take the first direct measurements of how much sunlight is reflected from the Earth. During his 2000 Presidential Campaign, Gore ran, in part, on a pledge to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.

After his defeat in the 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush, Gore returned his focus to the topic. He edited and adapted a slideshow he had compiled years earlier, and began featuring the slideshow in multimedia presentations on global warming across the U.S. and around the world. At the time of the film, Gore estimated he had shown the presentation more than one thousand times.

Producers Laurie David and Lawrence Bender saw Gore's slide show in New York City after the 2004 premiere of The Day After Tomorrow.[19] Inspired, they met with director Davis Guggenheim about the possibility of making the slide show into a movie. Guggenheim, who was skeptical at first, later saw the presentation for himself, stating that he was "blown away," and "left after an hour and a half thinking that global warming [was] the most important issue. . . . I had no idea how you’d make a film out of it, but I wanted to try," he said.[20]

Reception

Box office

The film opened in New York City and Los Angeles on May 24 2006. On Memorial Day weekend, it grossed an average of $91,447 per theater, the highest of any movie that weekend and a record for a documentary, though it was only playing on four screens at the time.[21]

At the 2006 Sundance Film Festival, the movie received three standing ovations. It was also screened at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival and was the opening night film at the 27th Durban International Film Festival on June 14 2006. An Inconvenient Truth was the most popular documentary at the 2006 Brisbane International Film Festival.[22]

The film has grossed over $24 million in the U.S. and over $49 million worldwide as of June 3 2007, making it the fourth-highest-grossing documentary in the U.S. to date (after Fahrenheit 9/11, March of the Penguins and Sicko).[23]

Al Gore has stated, "Tipper and I are devoting 100 percent of the profits from the book and the movie to a new bipartisan educational campaign to further spread the message about global warming."[24] Paramount Classics is committing 5% of their domestic theatrical gross for the film to a new bipartisan climate action group, Alliance for Climate Protection, dedicated to awareness and grassroots organizing.[25]

Reviews

The film received a positive reaction from critics. It garnered a "certified fresh" 93% rating at Rotten Tomatoes (as of May 21 2007), with a 94% rating from the "Cream of the Crop" reviewers. Film critics Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper gave the film "two thumbs up". Ebert wrote: "In 39 years, I have never written these words in a movie review, but here they are: You owe it to yourself to see this film. If you do not, and you have grandchildren, you should explain to them why you decided not to."[26]

Journalist Ronald Bailey argued in the libertarian magazine Reason that although "Gore gets [the science] more right than wrong," he exaggerates the risks. [27]

Awards

The film has received a number of various awards worldwide.

File:AlGoreWin.jpg
Al Gore during the Oscar acceptance speech for "An Inconvenient Truth" with other members of the crew
  • The film received special recognition from the Humanitas Prize, the first time the organization had handed out a Special Award in over 10 years.[30]
  • 2007 Stanley Kramer Award - The Producers Guild of America; recognizes "work that dramatically illustrates provocative social issues".[31]
  • The President’s Award 2007 - The Society for Technical Communication "for demonstrating that effective and understandable technical communication, when coupled with passion and vision, has the power to educate—and change—the world."[32]

Best Documentary:[34]

Best Non-Fiction:

Political response

The documentary has been generally well-received politically in many parts of the world and is credited for raising further awareness of global warming internationally, prompting calls for more government action in regard to the climate. Despite its success, some political leaders are less keen on embracing the film as a matter-of-fact necessity. Several colleges and high schools have begun to use the film in science curricula, [46] though at least one US school district has put restrictions on its use in the classroom.[47]

Government

  • President Bush, when asked whether he would watch the film, responded: "Doubt it." He later stated that "And in my judgment we need to set aside whether or not greenhouse gases have been caused by mankind or because of natural effects, and focus on the technologies that will enable us to live better lives and at the same time protect the environment."[48] Gore responded that "The entire global scientific community has a consensus on the question that human beings are responsible for global warming and he [Bush] has today again expressed personal doubt that that is true."[48] White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino stated that “The president noted in 2001 the increase in temperatures over the past 100 years and that the increase in greenhouse gases was due to certain extent to human activity”.[48]
  • In September 2006, Gore traveled to Sydney, Australia to promote the film. Australian Prime Minister, John Howard said he would not meet with Gore or agree to Kyoto because of the movie: "I don't take policy advice from films." Former Opposition Leader Kim Beazley joined Gore for a viewing and other MPs attended a special screening at Parliament House earlier in the week.[49]

Education

  • The film will be science curriculum for fourth and sixth-year students in Scotland, as a joint initiative between Learning and Teaching Scotland and ScottishPower.[55]

Other

Controversy

UK High Court findings and ruling

Following the issuing of the IPCC report into Climate Change on February 2 2007 and following on from the The Stern Review into the economic effects to the UK from climate change, the UK Government announced that it would be issuing a copy of the DVD of An Inconvenient Truth together with further reading material on this subject to every secondary school in England and Wales to increase educational awareness of the issues raised in the movie. The judge ruled that the film could continue to be shown; that "Al Gore's presentation of the causes and likely effects of climate change in the film was broadly accurate." and that the film advances four main scientific hypotheses, each of which is very well supported by research published in respected, peer-reviewed journals and accords with the latest conclusions of the IPCC [4] and did not amount to political indoctrination, supporting the Government's decision to issue the DVD [5]. However, school officials are required to bear in mind that the film promotes partisan or "one sided" political views, although the law does not require teaching staff to adopt a position of neutrality between views which accord with the great majority of scientific opinion and those which do not. In a detailed summary, Judge Burton ruled that guidance notes would be required for future viewings and listed nine specific scientific 'errors' in the film. One of these, relating to discussion in the film of "If Greenland broke up and melted, or if half of Greenland and half of West Antarctica broke up and melted" was that it "is distinctly alarmist, and part of Mr Gore's 'wake-up call'. It is common ground that if indeed Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water, but only after, and over, millennia, so that the Armageddon scenario he predicts, insofar as it suggests that sea level rises of 7 metres might occur in the immediate future, is not in line with the scientific consensus". Burton also found it "noteworthy that in the (unamended) Guidance Note there is no or no adequate discussion at all, either by way of description or by way of raising relevant questions for discussion, in relation to any of the above 9 'errors', the first two of which are at any rate apparently based on non-existent or misunderstood evidence, and the balance of which are or may be based upon lack of knowledge or appreciation of the scientific position, and all of which are significant planks in Mr Gores's 'political' argumentation."[58] Gore responded to the court ruling by saying that “there will always be questions around the edges of the science, and we have to rely upon the scientific community to continue to ask and to challenge and to answer those questions.”

National Science Teachers Association

50,000 free copies of the film were offered to the National Science Teachers Association, which declined to take them. Laurie David, one of the film's producers, said in a Washington Post op-ed piece that the NSTA wrote her in an E-mail that the DVDs would place "unnecessary risk upon the [NSTA] capital campaign, especially certain targeted supporters." Supporters of the NSTA include companies like ExxonMobil.[59] In public, the NSTA argued that distributing this film to its members would have been contrary to a long-standing NSTA policy against distributing unsolicited materials to its members.[60]

Federal Way School District, WA

After a father had complained that the movie only showed one point of view, the Federal Way School Board in Federal Way, Washington voted 3 to 0 requiring an approval by the principal and the superintendent for teachers to show the film to students. The teachers must include the presentation of an approved "opposing view". [61] After two weeks of being derided in the national and local press, the moratorium was repealed at the subsequent meeting on January 23. [62]

Yakima, Washington

Following Federal Way's lead, the Environmental Club of Eisenhower High School in Yakima, Washington was prevented from showing the film until it could be reviewed by the school board, teachers, principal, and parents. The school board called the film a "controversial issue" and indicated it would require presentation of an opposing viewpoint if it approved the showing.[63]

Criticism

Further information: [[:Global Warming controversy]]

Academia

Richard S. Lindzen, an atmospheric physicist at MIT and anthropogenic global warming skeptic, wrote in a June 26 2006 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that Gore was using a biased presentation to exploit the fears of the public for his own political gain. [64] Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the Earth System Science Center of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, wrote an open letter to Gore criticizing his presentation of climate science in the film, asserting that the Arctic had a similar temperature in the 1930s before the mass emissions of carbon dioxide began.[65] Former University of Winnipeg geography professor Dr. Timothy F. Ball rejected Gore’s claim that there has been a sharp drop-off in the thickness of the Arctic ice cap since 1970, stating that the data was taken only from an isolated area of the Arctic and during a specific cooling period.[66]

Showing the film in schools has proven to be controversial. In December of 2006 the National Science Teachers Association, which is made up of over 53,000 educators, declined 50,000 free DVDs of the film.[67] The school board in Federal Way schools voted to restrict the film, calling it "too controversial.[68] Two weeks later, after broad public condemnation, the board lifted the ban.[69]

Media

A March 13 2007 article in The New York Times reported on concerns among some scientists about the tone and the accuracy of the film, noting that they "argue that some of Mr. Gore’s central points are exaggerated and erroneous". Gore's discussion of a rise in sea level of up to 20 feet is contrasted with a report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which predicts a maximum rise of 23 inches excluding non-linear effects on ice sheets; although that too discusses the possibilities of higher rises if the ice sheets melt. The article also states that "a report last June by the National Academies seemed to contradict Mr. Gore’s portrayal of recent temperatures as the highest in the past millennium."[7] The article quotes both defenders and critics of the film; Gore responds that scientists may disagree with him on some details, "but we do agree on the fundamentals."[7]

The Great Global Warming Swindle

Main article: The Great Global Warming Swindle

The documentary film The Great Global Warming Swindle, broadcast on Channel 4 in the UK on March 8 2007, brought together skeptical scientists who disagree with the consensus regarding human-caused global warming. Among other claims, the film states that Gore has misrepresented the data in An Inconvenient Truth, and that the actual relationship between carbon dioxide and the temperature is the other way round (that is, rise in temperature preceded an increase in carbon dioxide in the ice core samples).

Several of the film's claims have been disputed by scientists and scientific bodies such as John T. Houghton [70], the British Antarctic Survey [71], Eigil Friis-Christensen [6] and the Royal Society[72]. Global warming skeptic Fred Singer wrote that the documentary is "devastating" to Gore's movie: "...The Great Global Warming Swindle is based on sound science by recording the statements of real climate scientists. An Inconvenient Truth mainly records a politician."[73] However, Singer's independence has been questioned since his not-for-profit organisation has accepted funds from the oil industry.[74]

File:Ghjkl.JPG
South Park parody of An Inconvenient Truth with Al Gore
  • Prior to being released, the film was parodied in the South Park episode "Manbearpig"." Gore laughed off this sensationalized depiction of him, saying "Their comic sensibility is aimed at a different demographic than the one I inhabit, but I still find a lot of what they do hilarious."[75]
  • In "The Simpsons Movie", "An Inconvenient Truth" is parodied when Lisa Simpson, presenting dangers of global warming to Springfield's residents in a style similar to Al Gore, fails to properly operate a crane intended to lift her up in order to show a spike of data on a projected graph regarding global warming.
  • Stephen Colbert, on The Colbert Report, also parodied An Inconvenient Truth on 17 July 2006. Entitled "The Convenientest Truth", Colbert created his own presentation that argued for the positive effects of global warming, using his signature humor tactics to satirize the conservative response to Gore's presentation.[76]
  • During the movie, Al Gore shows a clip from the Futurama episode "Crimes of the Hot" dealing with global warming; Al Gore was a guest star in that episode, though he was not present in the clip. While not the credited author of this episode, his daughter, Kristin Gore Cusack, was on the Futurama writing staff and worked as a story editor. In addition, Gore stars in a faux trailer made by the Futurama cast and crew titled, A Terrifying Message from Al Gore.[77]

See also

References

  1. ^ "On a Bender: A chat with Inconvenient Truth co-producer and Hollywood bigwig Lawrence Bender". Grist.org. Retrieved March 7 2007.
  2. ^ "Winner: Documentary Feature, An Inconvenient Truth". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. February 25 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ "New York Times Bestsellers: Paperback Nonfiction". The New York Times. July 2, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-17.
  4. ^ "Documentary 1982-Present (film rankings by lifetime gross)". Box Office Mojo.
  5. ^ "Paramount Classics To Donate An Unprecedented One Million Dollars To Fight Global Warming". Climatecrisis.net. 2006-08-04. Retrieved 2007-06-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ David, Laurie (2006-11-26). "Science a la Joe Camel". The Washington Post. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ a b c Broad, William J. (2007-03-13). "From a Rapt Audience, a Call to Cool the Hype". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ Lindzen, Richard (2006-08-02). "Don't believe the Hype". OpinionJournal.com. Retrieved 2007-05-31. {{cite web}}: Check |authorlink= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0978403/
  10. ^ Spahni, Renato (2005). "Atmospheric Methane and Nitrous Oxide of the Late Pleistocene from Antarctic Ice Cores (abstract)". Science. 310 (5752): 1317–1321. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  11. ^ Oreskes, Naomi (2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Science. 306 (5702): 1686. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  12. ^ Borenstein, Seth (June 27, 2006). "Scientists OK Gore's Movie for Accuracy". Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. ^ "AP Incorrectly Claims Scientists Praise Gore's Movie". U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. June 27, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  14. ^ Coile, Zachary (October 11, 2006). "Senator fights the tide, calls warming by humans a hoax". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ Eric, Steig (May 10, 2006). "Al Gore's movie". RealClimate. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. ^ Michael, Shermer (June 2006). "The Flipping Point: How the evidence for anthropogenic global warming has converged to cause this environmental skeptic to make a cognitive flip". Scientific American. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  17. ^ Voynar, Kim. "Sundance: An Inconvenient Truth Q & A - Al Gore on fire! No, really." "Cinematical." January 26, 2006. [1]
  18. ^ Remnick, David. "The Talk of the Town." New Yorker." April 14, 2006.[2]
  19. ^ Booth, William. "Al Gore, Sundance's Leading Man." "Washington Post." January 26, 2006. [3]
  20. ^ Alex Steffen (May 4 2006). "Interview: David Guggenheim and An Inconvenient Truth". WorldChanging.com. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  21. ^ 'Last Stand' delivers IMDb, 2006-05-30, accessed 2007-01-10
  22. ^ BIFF EXCEEDS ALL EXPECTATIONS (Adobe Reader format) accessed 2007-01-10
  23. ^ Documentary Movies Box Office Mojo, accessed 2007-06-09
  24. ^ Housewife addresses climate conference Flanders News, dated 2006-11-16, accessed 2007-01-10
  25. ^ Governing Council The Alliance for Climate Protection, accessed 2007-01-10
  26. ^ Roger Ebert An Inconvenient Truth Chicago Sunday Times, accessed 2007-01-10
  27. ^ Ronald Bailey Gore as climate exaggerator Reason, dated 2006-06-16, accessed 2007-01-10
  28. ^ a b "Hudson wins supporting actress Oscar". CNN. February 25 207. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ "Oscar Night: Winner: Music (Song)". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science. February 25 2007. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  30. ^ "2006 HUMANITAS Prize Winners" (PDF). the HUMANITAS prize. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 16 January. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ "Stanley Kramer Award: An Inconvenient Truth". Variety.com. 2007-01-18. Retrieved 18 January. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  32. ^ "President's Award". stc.com. 2007-07-18. Retrieved 18 July. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ "2007 Nobel Peace Prize Laureates". Retrieved 11 October. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  34. ^ An Inconvenient Truth - Awards and Nominations Yahoo, accessed February 10 2007
  35. ^ "Winners Announced for the 2006 Chicago Film Critics Awards". Chicago Film Critics Association. 2006-12-28. Retrieved 2007-06-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  36. ^ "DFWFilmCritics". Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics Association. Retrieved 2007-06-01.
  37. ^ "Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics Association Awards: 2006". IMDb. 2006-12-18. Retrieved 2007-06-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  38. ^ "Florida Film Critics Circle Awards - 2006". Retrieved 2007-10-08.
  39. ^ "Film Critic's Circle of Kansas City". Retrieved 2007-10-08.
  40. ^ "NBR page on An Inconvenient Truth". National Board of Review of Motion Pictures.
  41. ^ "New York Film Critics Online". Movie City News. 2006-12-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  42. ^ http://www.cofca.org/awards.php?year=2006
  43. ^ "Oklahoma Film Critics Circle: Oklahoma Film Critics Circle Announces 2006 Awards". Retrieved 2007-10-08.
  44. ^ "Online Film Critics Society Awards - 2006". Retrieved 2007-10-08.
  45. ^ Hernandez, Eugene (2007-01-06). "The Critics Have Spoken (Again); National Society Chooses "Pan's Labyrinth" As Best Film of 2006". Retrieved 2007-06-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  46. ^ Libin, Kevin (May 19, 2007). "Gore's Inconvenient Truth required classroom viewing?". National Post. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  47. ^ Solomon, Cara (January 16, 2007). "Moratorium on Al Gore film sparks own controversy". The Seattle Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  48. ^ a b c "Bush gives thumbs down to Gore's new movie". Associated Press. 2006-05-24. Retrieved 2007-05-31. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  49. ^ "Howard isolated on climate change: Gore". Nine Network. 2006-09-11. Retrieved 2007-05-31. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  50. ^ Full text of David Cameron's speech to the Conservative Party conference, Guardian Unlimited, 4 October 2006, accessed 25 November 2006
  51. ^ "Spitzenpolitiker sehen Gore-Film". Flanderninfo.be. 2006-10-31. Retrieved 2007-05-31. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  52. ^ http://www.fundacionprincipedeasturias.org/ing/04/premiados/trayectorias/trayectoria815.html
  53. ^ Gore climate documentary to be shown in schools, Expatica, 7 February 2007, accessed 11 February 2007
  54. ^ "Screening of An Inconvenient Truth set to educate students on climate change" (Press release). Halton District School Board. 2007-04-24. {{cite press release}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  55. ^ David Leask (January 17 2007). "All secondary schools to see Gore climate film". The Herald. Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  56. ^ "Where did that video spoofing Gore's film come from?". Wall Street Journal. 2006-08-03. Retrieved 2007-06-01.
  57. ^ "Slick lobbying is behind penguin spoof of Al Gore". The Times. 2006-08-05. Retrieved 2007-06-01.
  58. ^ Cite error: The named reference 2007EWHC2288 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  59. ^ Laurie David (November 26 2006). "Science a la Joe Camel". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2006-11-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  60. ^ Gerald Wheeler (November 28 2006). "NSTA Statement on November 26 Washington Post Op-ed "Science à la Joe Camel"". National Science Teachers Association. Retrieved 2007-01-09. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  61. ^ Robert McClure & Lisa Stiffler (January 11 2007). "Federal Way schools restrict Gore film". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved 2007-01-11. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  62. ^ Cara Solomon (January 24 2007). "Federal Way School Board lifts brief moratorium on Gore film". Seattle Times. Retrieved 2007-04-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  63. ^ KNDO (January 24 2007). "School Delays Viewing of Global Warming Documentary". KNDO. Retrieved 2007-01-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  64. ^ Richard S. Lindzen There Is No 'Consensus' On Global Warming Wall Street Journal, accessed 2007-01-10
  65. ^ Questions for Al Gore by Roy Spencer TCS Daily - Questions for Al Gore, 2006-05-25, accessed 2007-03-13
  66. ^ http://www.epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=257909
  67. ^ "AN INCONVENIENT CONTROVERSY". Retrieved 2007-10-05.
  68. ^ "Federal Way schools restrict Gore film; 'Inconvenient Truth' called too controversial". Retrieved 2007-10-05.
  69. ^ "Federal Way School Board lifts brief moratorium on Gore film". Retrieved 2007-10-05.
  70. ^ Houghton, John. "The Great Global Warming Swindle". The John Ray Initiative. Retrieved 2007-03-12. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  71. ^ BAS Statement about Channel 4 programme on Global Warming
  72. ^ "The Royal Society's response to the documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle"". Royal Society. 11 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-04-03.
  73. ^ Singer, Fred (19 March 2007). "The Great Global Warming Swindle". Independent Institute. Retrieved 2007-07-08.
  74. ^ "Factsheet: S. Fred Singer". ExxonSecrets.org. Retrieved 2007-02-26.
  75. ^ "Gore promotes his 'ultimate action movie'". Chicago Sun-Times. 5 May 2006. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  76. ^ "The Convenientest Truth". ComedyCentral.com.
  77. ^ "A Terrifying Message from Al Gore". YouTube.
Listen to this article
(2 parts, 18 minutes)
  2. Part 2
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help · More spoken articles)
Preceded by Academy Award for Documentary Feature
2006 		Succeeded by
—

Template:Energy Conversion

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=An_Inconvenient_Truth&oldid=164341514"