Jump to content

User talk:HeWhoE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Staeckerbot (talk | contribs) at 22:14, 13 October 2007 (Robot notifying duplicate image uploader). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, HeWhoE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

chocolateboy 20:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jaqueline Lovell

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jaqueline Lovell, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -- Chris 73 Talk 23:02, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ted L. Nancy

Thanks for experimenting with the page Ted L. Nancy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

chocolateboy 20:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Quincy 2 at Quincy CA excursion in 50s.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. chocolateboy 02:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ted L. Nancy

Consider the follow quotes from [1].

Nut may use Seinfeld as its bait, but Jerry is no nut himself. Even though there have been three bestsellers by the mysteriously named author "Ted L. Nancy" that played on the question of Seinfeld's involvement, I can tell you without a doubt that Jerry is no Nancy. Indeed, this column has mentioned several times over the last couple of years that the author of the best-selling Letters from a Nut books is none other than the prospective TV show's executive producer, Barry Marder.


I thought it was pretty funny when I read the wire story. Either they're in on the joke and don't want to expose it, or they really think Seinfeld is the pseudonymous author Ted L. Nancy. I can assure you he is not. But Marder, who also is famous for getting a pastrami sandwich with Seinfeld on the afternoon before Jerry's wedding to Jessica Sklar, is — and he deserves to have his own hit now. I look forward to the show next winter.

To me that sounds like the author of column (Roger Friedman) is making the assertion that Ted L. Nancy is a pseudonym of Barry Marder. What is your interpretation?

As for naming the person in the article you can do that, but the URL is there for people to check the source if they want to, so it's not an anonymous person and unverifiable. Qutezuce 07:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You took the words right out of my mouth. We must have been writing at about the same time, because I wrote on your "talk page" essentially the same thing you said! Thank you, Qutezuce. Thank you for understanding me finally! Yay! I feel better now. HeWhoE 07:25, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that we've come to a resolution. In the future a better way of discussing issues would be to post your concerns to the talk page of the relevant article. It works much better then reverting pages and communicating in the edit summary like we had been doing. Qutezuce 07:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Understood!  ;)

HeWhoE 07:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gay way.ogg, but unfortunately entire songs cannot be claimed as fair use. Only short, low quality samples that illustrate their respective article can be used. U.S. copyright law states that song samples must be no longer than 30 seconds or 10% of the song, whichever is shorter. Wikipedia policy is to speedily delete copyright infringements if they were uploaded within the past 48 hours, but you are welcome to re-upload a new file that follows fair use guidelines. Thank you! ~MDD4696 05:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Year of the Sirius Dog.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Year of the Sirius Dog.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

dbenbenn | talk 22:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Image:Quincy2SpecSheet.gif. dbenbenn | talk 22:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also Image:2006 Chinese New Year Dog.jpg. dbenbenn | talk 08:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 24 hours for this edit. dbenbenn | talk 10:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good thing I wasn't online for those 24 hours! Har!

Semi-automated template substitution

Charlie Chaplin in Niles Canyon

  • Hi. Regarding Niles Canyon, Charlie Chaplin didn't begin his Tramp character there, but he did make a few movies there including one called "The Tramp". - Raymond Bell, 13 July, 2006

Clitoris picture

Why did you change the picture? I think the new one is vastly inferior to Saravulva or whatever it is called. --Anchoress 02:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the new picture is much lower in resolution. I just thought it might be neat to have a picture in the clitoris entry that showed both the clitoris and the clitoral hood more clearly. HeWhoE 02:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, well it's not just the resolution, it's the light level and the contrast. I agree that a pic with both might be better, but only if you could actually see the anatomical parts. Anchoress 03:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gong to try changing the contrast and light level in photoshop. If it doesn't make the anatomical parts more visible, I'll scrap my edits. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. HeWhoE 03:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds great. Just to let you know, there are a lot of POV warriors on the Clitoris page who keep trying to get photographs removed from the article, and therefore, there are a lot of people (myself included) who view with suspicious antagonism any undocumented changes to the pics. Sorry if I seemed snarky, I didn't know your reasons for the change (the original Saravulva pic had been removed and reverted several times recently). But... it would be in your own best interests to comment on the article's talk page the reasons why you made the change and your plans to improve the picture (especially since you didn't leave an edit summary, I'm sure I'm not the only person who will be agitated by the change). --Anchoress 03:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads-up, Anchoress. I'll comment on the talk page as advised. HeWhoE 03:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jerry Goldsmith London 2000.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jerry Goldsmith London 2000.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Labeled vicca.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Labeled vicca.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Borat thank Portugal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Borat thank Portugal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Borat in New York.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Borat in New York.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fred Rogers and Yo Yo Ma.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fred Rogers and Yo Yo Ma.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mister Rogers and Big Bird.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mister Rogers and Big Bird.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Meatabix.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Meatabix.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 07:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Goldsmith_on_Rambo.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Goldsmith_on_Rambo.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:King Kong Gottfried.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:King Kong Gottfried.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:What_borat_believe.jpg

I have tagged Image:What_borat_believe.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 09:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Screenshot0.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Screenshot0.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Iron Sheik visits Howard Stern.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Screenshot0.png. The copy called Image:Screenshot0.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]