Talk:A Fever You Can't Sweat Out

Albums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I just made this page after noticing it didn't exist from the band's Wikipedia site. I apologize for my horrendous job with the album table. :P I don't have album art for it yet because the cover from the band's webpage "could not be displayed because it contained errors." Meistergrado 03:43, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Proposal

I've proposed a Panic! at the Disco Wikiproject here, to see how many people would be interested before starting one. The project would be an effort by a group of Wikipedians to build and improve all Panic! at the Disco pages (including members of the band, songs and albums). If you think that you'd be reguarly editing these pages, please put your name down at this page so we can see who would be interested in the project. Thanks in advance- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 11:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will help outKnight Whitefire 06:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coolies :) CattleGirl ^talk 07:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Walker?

Jon didn't play bass on the record brendon did. in fact jon didnt become associated with panic until about a year after the album's release. i dont have an account so will some one else please edit that part of the article?

thats what i was wondering too. why did someone put that there if he wasn't associated with them when they recorded the album. PrincessOfHearts 21:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parental Advisory?

Who cares if it qualifies for PA label? It's a totally voluntary practice, and there have been thousands of albums in the label's history that may have qualified for it, but never got it. This is a useless addition to the article.

I agree- good examples being Dookie, Good News for People Who Love Bad News. The label is pretty arbitrary and doesn't need to be explained, seeing as it can even be given to albums with no use of profanity at all.

Tracks

Ive noticed that there is a wikipedia page for each album track, is this necessary? SouthEastLad 06:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:NOT, it's suitable for all entities that individually are notable to have an article about it. In this case, each individual song may not quite warrant a fully blown article but to include the information for all of the songs within this page would page this page way too long. I don't think it's suitable for pages to simply indicate that it's a song from the album. That's ridiculous, but if the page deserves to be there (i.e. there's a notable reason for it or it serves a purpose in the "greater P!atd picture"), then so be it.

linca ^linca 07:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The articles for non-singles are not notable enough for inclusion into wikipedia. So I went ahead and redirected most of the song articles to the album page, most of the information, however trivial it is, is already on the album page anyway. Rehevkor 18:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but could you direct me to a page that says "non-singles are not notable", or something to that effect? John 19:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure there is one. But the articles for the non singles on the album did not assert any notability, they were mostly trvial OR. If you think otherwise feel free to recrate a well sourced article which determines notability (i.e. notable awards, high chartings). Thank you. Rehevkor 19:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was just wondering. Because if so, you could go to any page of a band and clear there whole album out of non-singles. I just don't see the point, because all it does is add knowledge to Wiki. John 20:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove any non-singles if you think it's necessary. :) As for adding knowledge to the wiki, there has to be a line drawn, after removing an non encyclopedic information, original research and obscure trivia, most of the song pages would be just a line or two long (some of them were already a line or two long) which didn't warent an article of it's own, and could be added to the album page (which most of it already was). Also just because something is considered knowledge, doesn't mean it's notable. I'm sure the album changed your life or whatever, but does it require 15 articles to say that? Please feel free take a look at WP:NOT and WP:NOTE. Thanks. Rehevkor 20:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, the album didn't change my life. It's an album, with music. But, most of the non-singles have become cult favorites as well as the singles. For instance, the song "Time to Dance" features the verse about "shotgun wedding", which has become lines on myspace and icons everywhere. In other words, the songs that weren't featured as singles earned notority as well. John 20:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, if you feel they are notable, feel free to recreate with credible sources, following the guidlines (i.e. WP:CITE and the previously quotes ones). If they're still not up to scratch, I'll happily follow the AfD guidlines and let the users decide rather than simply redirecting this time around. Rehevkor 21:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care that much. I was just wondering why, and if you had a credible reason. I can do without them, but if others want to have them with their own articles, so be it. John 21:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll gladly make all the songs in A Fever You Can't Sweat Out have their own individual wikipedia page if you want considering I know a ton about all their songs, and I'll also do this for their 2007 Album as well.Knight Whitefire 06:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Culture References

Please do not simply remove the tags in this section without addressing them. I still don't see a single reference, which also suggests original research. It's also written as trivia. Thank you. Rehevkor 15:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one seems willing to address them, I did it for you.Rehevkor 15:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the trivia section whys it gone? All that information was confirmed true espacially because Panic! said most of the songs were connected to those books.

Then where're the sources saying as such? Still doesn't stop it being written as trivia. Rehevkor 03:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm saying is that they've said all those things and that's why they are in the trivia I've already deleted the stuff that weren't confirmed but unless you want me to have YouTube videos as references than there won't be any references.

There should be something saying the song "I constantly thank god for estaban" being a reference to the movie The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.209.214 (talk) 15:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section

I removed this: The album has since become one of the biggest selling records ever to be released on an independent label.

That is really broad, and there is absolutelty no sources