Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul VI High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oakshade (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 19 October 2007 (Paul VI High School: k). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Paul VI High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable, barely any refs, seems to have been created by a student, among other things. James Luftan contribs 21:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Article makes clear and explicit claim of notability in the form of a 28-year winning streak in cross country meets, which just ended, fully supported with a reliable and verifiable source. This is on top of the clear consensus that such schools are notable per WP:OUTCOMES. I assume only Z-class nominators are unfaimilar with this consensus. Z-class editors are also apparently unaware that Wikipedia:deletion policy requires dur diligence by nominators to edit and improve the article, a process which seems to have been ignored, in violation of Wikipedia policy. Alansohn 22:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A. I dont see anything on that document that refers to a win streak as notable. B. Please be courteous. I nominated an article and refered to a former student as "barely notable". This gives you no reason to attack me, my contributions or my intellect. Thank you. James Luftan contribs 22:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I strongly suggest reading Wikipedia:deletion policy, which seems to have been violated here, presumably out of ignorance. Future violations of this policy will not be tolerated. While even a student might have recognized a 244 meet win streak as notable, it took me seconds to find an editorial that states exactly that. As a tip, treat all content regardless of its creator in good faith without any attacks in the nomination. Individuals are notable or not notable; there seems to be no "barely notable" or "Z-class" status, other than intended as a derogatory remark. Alansohn 22:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've noted the creator as a possible student because, well, isn't that COI? And you're right, I changed it, I shouldn't be derogatory toward that one alum. James Luftan contribs 22:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]