User talk:Coredesat
Please Review Delete Page "AutoNOC"
Dear Coredesat. Please consider and review the delete on page "AutoNOC" or, take a much more thorough look through List of NMS to delete the other companies promoting their products. Please consider reinstating the AutoNOC page, or please delete all of the other product promotion pages on that list.
Also, where can we get the original source for the page in it's final form that you deleted? We would like to archive the content.
Your favorite person is back, again
Talk:Sonic X: Curse of Raven Radix. If you may, please. -- RattleMan 03:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Grey's Anatomy music
I was just wondering why you deleted the Grey's Anatomy music page. It was really useful for me, and it's kind of a bummer that it no longer exists.
76.78.12.228 16:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Nat
RfA Thanks
|
Thanks, Coredesat! Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was a success, and I look forward to getting started! Hiberniantears 18:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
Game Show
Guess the person and win $25,000! -- RattleMan 22:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Users' Alliance
Dear Friend, the Wikipedia Users’ Alliance has been deleted. I am sure that perhaps you already knew this. I myself just found out. Anyhow during the debate many mean and rude things where said. I am not innocent myself; I too contributed to the unpleasantness. But now Wikipedia Users’ Alliance is dead, gone forever. But we all must move on, for me and my friends, we have to deal with this loss. However it is important that all of us work together to fight vandalism and not argue with one another. There are many things that I want to say, but I know that they would only add to the mean sprit that fills the “air”. As a Buddhist (Risshō Kōsei Kai) I was reading the Holy Dhammapada yesterday. I came across this line, “Holding onto anger is like holding on to a hot coal with the intent to throw it at someone, in the end you are the one who gets burned,” how true! Lets us progress forward. WUA Founder User: King of Nepal has expressed similar views such as these to me via e-mail. His majesty said, “We have to move on, move forward. It is in the best interest of Wikipedia and us all.” I agree and hope that you do to. Thanks. --Greenwood1010 12:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Co-founder of the WUA. If you feel that you recived this message in error please let me know.
List of English Americans
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of English Americans. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Thanks Hmains 03:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
False charges
Coredesat, the charge which you'd referenced, that Matt57 posted private information about User:Elonka,[1], turned out to absolutely false - she'd advertised her site on her user subpage - just as was the earlier charge of sockpuppetry, as proven by checkuser.[2] Such charges reflect poorly upon, if anyone, the accusers, not the accused. That no one besides Chaser thought to apologize to him reflect very poorly upon all others involved, and upon what passes for the management of this project.Proabivouac 05:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Scooby-Doo 3: Return of Monsters
You forgot to remove this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 15:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Dale Hample DRV
Hi Coredesat. I messed up and opened a DRV without discussing the matter first with the AfD closer. The AfD closer subsequently agreed that the AfD should have been closed as delete. To minimize my mess up and save the closer from further unwarranted scrutiny, would you please review Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_October_24#Dale_Hample and close it if appropriate. Thanks. -- Jreferee t/c 15:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm fine with a normal 7 day DRV. On a different note, I see you met two of my fans below (Dammit Janet). LOL. Anyway, since the AfD failed to agree that the Articleissues and the original research tags on the article are appropriate, would you consider removing them from the Dammit, Janet! article. Thanks -- Jreferee t/c 14:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
DRV
Looks like no one gave you a notice yet, your deletion of Adrian Clarkson is at DRV: [3] --W.marsh 22:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
D'OH! I was looking into this matter quite literally some five minutes before you closed it as delete - and only now realised that though I strongly favored the article's keeping, and am a well-established editor by most standards, I didn't think it'd end so soon and never actually put keep into the discussion. So riddle me this - if I had, would it have affected consensus on its own? --Kizor 05:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Motivated largely - and one can't put much trust into estimates of motivations from online text, though some users involved are open in this - by varying amounts of dislike/hatred for such articles. Oh well, that's omnipresent in fiction AfDs these days. If making the existence of an additional keep argument clearer would've changed nothing, then there's no reason to pursue the matter further :(. (Mind, if it had, I don't know what I'd have done next - but my improvisation has, on a few occasions, done some fairly interesting things to process in the name of the good of the encyclopedia. :P) Oh, and thanks. I hope to wear the mop with pride. --Kizor 05:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm asking this question more so for answers... Why did you feel that this should close as Delete (though you did redirect this article), when given prior precedent and evidence of that prior precedent, winners of a notable show, especially if they are the first to win in that show's history, are notable enough to be included on Wikipedia? Saaphyri Windsor isn't just one of the girls from Flavor of Love Girls: Charm School; she won that show. No different than other reality television show contestants who won the show in which they were on and were given their own article on Wikipedia. The main (probably only) reason that this article was nominated for deletion was because it was brought up in another deletion debate of the same subject matter, which, oddly enough...closed as a Keep...while this one closed as Delete. Flyer22 05:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to explain your decision on this matter. As I stated on my talk page, I don't agree with your decision to delete this article, and I know that precedent may not be binding in every deletion debate, but I understand your stance, of course. Flyer22 16:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you just closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlaneShift (computer game)...you meant to close the entire page or just the first section? Best regards, Tuxide 06:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Dammit Janet
Can you explain to me why it is that an article that has zero independent sources that go beyond mentioning the title of the song can be kept? Do you as an admin have no responsibility to evaluate the facts? Otto4711 12:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- So if I am understanding you correctly, you agree with the delete arguments? Otto4711 12:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Even if you think it would go to DRV, please do so. Somebody has to make Jreferee understand that there are standards, and they do apply to him and his articles. Perhaps a bit of time in the swamp will accomplish that. Reinforcing bad behaviour does nothing to prevent its reoccurence.Kww 13:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Just a note to let you know that this AfD, which you closed, has been taken to DRV. The interested party completely screwed up the DRV request and neglected to inform you of it, but I'm sure that's par for the course. Deor 13:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
DRV Notice
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Atlanta Boy Band. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.--- Jreferee t/c 15:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I propose to take this to DRV as the article was improved subsequent to most of the discussion, adding references and asserting notability. As the deleting admin, you may wish to preempt this. Colonel Warden 18:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Spam? The three references added were to an academic study, a government tourist site and an academic institution. Not seeing why this non-commercial item is spam while Twinkies, Cheez Whiz and Mountain Dew are not. Colonel Warden 18:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure this isn't a surprise
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dammit, Janet!. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Otto4711 18:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Saaphyri Windsor
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Saaphyri_Windsor. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Gamer83 18:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)