User talk:69.162.158.161

Welcome. Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks!

Please do not attempt to disrupt the Votes for Deletion process by toying with an article's vote page. If you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Hadal 17:19, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours due to continued vandalism. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:50, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please do not recreate an article which has been previously deleted via VfD. If you want an article restored, list it on Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion where the article's worthiness will be decided by the community. Continuing to recreate deleted articles constitutes vandalism, and you will be prevented from editing if you continue. -- Hadal 16:54, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Stop recreating the Praxis article. The community's consensus was to have it removed from the Wikipedia; please do not go against it. If you persist, you will be blocked again. • Benc • 16:00, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- 00:54, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I have blocked you for 24 hours for altering the votes of other people at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/List_of_people_named_bill. It must have been clear to you that this was not acceptable behaviour.-gadfium 04:12, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You've been blocked again for repeat vandalism. [[User:Rdsmith4|User:Rdsmith4/sig]] 03:43, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thue | talk 18:49, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Blocked for 24 hours. Thue | talk 22:32, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Human

Please don't edit Human like that again. Although your statement is probably accurate, please do not remove the rest of the article when adding a sentence. Also, regardless if humans are "pathetic", calling them that is biased and we try to present all articles from a neutral point of view. If you register, you can put this type of thing on your user page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions about how to contribute to our encyclopedia. Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:38, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

---