Talk:Society for Truth and Light
LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class | |||||||
|
This organization appears to be the equivalent of Focus on the Family or the Traditional Values Coalition in the United States. This is a typical conservative Christian organization. Some individuals appear to have been vandalizing this page a few times to portray this organization as a hate group. Although (like other conservative groups) this organization disapproves of abortion and homosexuality for a number of reasons, they do not in any way advocate hate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.18.18.173 (talk) 03:42, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
- Who is the actual vandalist? It seems its a right wing moral taliban who is located in United States.
OrgName: Verizon Internet Services Inc. OrgID: VRIS Address: 1880 Campus Commons Dr City: Reston StateProv: VA PostalCode: 20191 Country: US
NetRange: 70.16.0.0 - 70.23.255.255 CIDR: 70.16.0.0/13 NetName: VIS-70-16 NetHandle: NET-70-16-0-0-1 Parent: NET-70-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.BELLATLANTIC.NET NameServer: NS2.BELLATLANTIC.NET NameServer: NS2.VERIZON.NET NameServer: NS4.VERIZON.NET Comment: Please send all abuse reports to abuse@verizon.net. Comment: DO NOT send e-mail to DIA.ADMIN@verizon.com as it will not be answered. RegDate: 2004-03-30 Updated: 2006-06-01
OrgAbuseHandle: VISAB-ARIN OrgAbuseName: VIS Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-214-513-6711 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@verizon.net
OrgTechHandle: ZV20-ARIN OrgTechName: Verizon Internet Services OrgTechPhone: 800-243-6994 OrgTechEmail: IPMGMT@verizon.com
- ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-08-27 19:10
- Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
Although I do not agree with the extreme stance of this organization, I think this entry is a bit unbiased - at least the organization should not be categorized as a hate group...
Is anyone going to fix this article?Siurekrek 11:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- For a group advertisement on newspapers for 23 consecutive days in front page, middle page; spent roughly a million against a Discrimination Based on Sexual Perference. Enlisted distorted research report, doctored research, changed conclusion of research report, added content just to wound public image of LGBT. It is hard to argue otherwise, how about an opportunitistic profiting from GLBT bashing group?
- They also promote the concept of 'Reverse Discrimination', i.e. Anyone has the right to discriminate against LGBT. The advocate of right-to-discriminate group, shouldn't we call it a hate group?
Needs POV work
The article needs work to make it NPOV. This might be achievable, for example, by finding sources that identify this group as a "hate group" and attributing this label to the sources. TableManners 07:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Chinese language references
I moved the following recent contributions here:
- [http://www.pcdiscuss.com/forum/archiver/tid-158001.html reference1]
- [http://fklmstss.mysch.net/~ceadmin/center2-11.htm reference2]
- [http://ymchow74.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=586521 reference3]
- [http://swtsang.mocasting.com/p/117133 reference4]
- [http://lightnesssnow.hkbloggers.org/?p=440 reference5] *<nowiki>[http://swtsang.mocasting.com/p/117133 reference6]
Because they are written in Chinese, requires specialist knowledge. Also, many of them appear to be blog entries of some sort. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources 02:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Needs sources
This article needs sources badly; calling something a "hate group" without a single source is egregious. --Haemo 02:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism by Admin User:Haemo
This article has been vandalised by an admin who (very likely) know nothing about what's happening in Hong Kong and abused its power to force its view on others.--203.218.218.253 02:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have not "vandalized" anything. I don't know boo about Hong Kong, but I know a lot about how we're supposed to reference things. This page is not appropriately referenced, and concerns over neutrality have not been addressed. The only reason I have not restored the neutrality tag is because I'm a good boy who follows the three revert rule even when others don't. --Haemo 02:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)