User talk:AntiSpamBot
Volvo Penta
The bot removed a valuable link for Volvo Penta. The information provided in the link was produced by Volvo to describe the inner workings and benefits of their revolutionary engine. This is the world’s first reverse direction marine engine and it’s very popular, please consider this relevant link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_Penta
Aimspambot reverted me fix it!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Creek_High_School_(San_Jose,_California) Code Red and Transformer Explosion sections...
Was not a spam link!
I posted links to tour maps for several bands, this is a nice supplement to the info on those bands as you can find out when they are playing near you. It got reverted: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.107.232.51&redirect=no
I reviewed the policies on spam links and found nothing that would explain the reversion except perhaps if I added too many links in a day. There is no login or registration required, the info is current reliable and useful. I would appreciate if these tour-map links could be placed on the whitelist so I could add a few more.
I posted an external link in the Fl Studio article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FL_Studio) linking to a very good flash tutorial hosted on Newgrounds.COM, but because it's on Newgrounds.COM, the link was removed for being spam. Please re-consider.
Was not a spam link!
Hey ShadowBot honey the Avant Punk Army may be on Myspace but it's inf;luence to the Bizarro scene is direct! My Edit: [1] And I will add that those are not my doing but the links to "The New Absurdist" are not spam either! That mag is well recognize among the Bizarro culture! Thank you! I love you Wiki God!! xox
I posted in the "Popular culture part" of the article on Outhouse a reference to the Placebo song "Brick Shithouse" with a link to the lyrics. I also pointed out the origins of that metaphorical phrase, with a real link to the urban dictionary. Your antispam bot got rid of that, and some other links to Wikipedia articles. None of this was copyrighted material. They were all real links. Please reconsider.
--172.167.245.115 00:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies. The bot was doing its job by removing an imageshack link. Shadow1 (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:Chandra Wilson interview.
Hi, I asked a couple of questions last week. I was wondering if you had any answers for me. Below is the original text. Thanks!
The creation of the category 'Mortal Status', under Jack Bauer
The bot automatically deleted my small subarticle because of a link to another website, facebook.com. I understand the bot is an automatic processer, however I do implore you to manually read the article and decide for yourself whether or not the link is necessary. Personnally, I think the link is the very essence of the article, as it shows the page where the religion of Bauerism was created. Please do contact me with your answer, which ever way you see it. Thank you.
Edits to Transportation in Albania
in albanian transportation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_in_Albania, the bot deleted all my comments. i dont understand why. I was fixing everything to be more accurate of the time.
The Used Edits
Okay that's fair enough, I didn't realise! Someone has deleted the Australian chart info as well, despite the fact it can clearly be seen on the offcial website which was linked. I've added it back on but I would appreciate if you would doube check and make sure I did it okay, maybe I am missing something.
Edited stadium article
No it looks ok now. As long as it doesnt have just football in the title.
The footage article and it's link for Phantasm V
AntiSpamBot, it would seem that the footage article and it's link for Phantasm V are gone. But I don't see how it's spam related. Can I please put them back to the Phantasm V article?
- -The Correctonator 7/14/07
Regarding edits to Lucky (Nada Surf album)
My edit wasn't a spam link. I understand your policy towards MSN groups, however, the press release mentioned there doesn't appear on any other HTTP ressource. I'll fix it by publishing the original PDF file on another website, but until then, I consider this statement is enlighting enough to be shared.Nadasurfan (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- It mentions a press release .. so maybe the original press has the document. It does not have to have a HTTP resource ... as long as the original document can be found, it should be OK. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)