User talk:Pmedema
Talk to me...
I'm all ears!
Hi,
I have a question about the entry Proton_card. I understand it can be seen as blatant advertising when I mentioned the owner of the copyright. I removed the link to their website (I'm not employed by them btw). I then assumed it would be ok to leave the mention of what it is and where it is used, much like the entry on Mon€o. Granted, that one is more elaborate, but as it is, I haven't even had time to put more text on the page before it was deleted.
Isn't wikipedia about making small edits and letting other people add stuff? Anyway, since this was one of my first additions to the pedia, I'm a bit miffed :)
cheers, --Repo stef (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
edit: Ah, but I understand now I think... There was someone who created the backlink without a page on the smartcard entry. That one has been removed as well. There was never a stub article in the first place. Anyway, my remark about mon€o still stands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Repo stef (talk • contribs) 08:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I've been a user of Wikipedia for a long time and have started doing some editing and learning the ropes, etc. I can understand that having an article that you have written is removed. In future, if you do make another article, as a suggestion, look through some of the articles about writing an article. If you are finding that there is not alot of content right away and that you are "working on it" I would suggest going to Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance and use some of the 'inuse' templates. :) --Pmedema (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! That should be a great help in the future. --Repo stef (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)