Talk:Crutch

Medicine Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crutches

Crutches were also used in ECW alot, so they are also a weapon. Whopper 00:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I was unaware of their role in the English Civil War.

The entry for 'Strutters' claims advantages over traditional crutches and that the design has been unchanged since the 19thC, both points which clearly apply to underarm/axillary crutches only, not to forearm crutches. The point relating to upper-leg atrophy for 'knee support crutches' seems heavily dependent on the type of injury/disability and gait pattern of the user, for instance they would be useless to someone with an above knee injury/disability. I'd recommend reordering the list by frequency of use, which would give forearm, underarm, (the rest). DWG 4-Jun-2006

I enjoyed that second comment up there. Also it seems as if strutters has been strategically placed as an advertisement. I mean they should be in there, but not read like some sales pitch. Youknowthatoneguy 10:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

The External Links for Strutter Use and Types of Crutches are both just advertisements, not factual resources. It seems to me that they don't belong here.

A quick web search turned up a lot more advertising, and then this: Crutches which provides some but not all of the same information as the article.

I would be inclined to just remove those two External Links. Being a newbie I hesitate to do that without first mentioning it here. Any objections?

--Sylvia A 01:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold in removing inappropriate links and replacing them with higher-quality references. If someone disagrees and reverts your change, you can discuss it here. The cycle of bold edit, reversion, discussion is a common pattern here. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first link returned a 404 error, and the second link was spam. I deleted them. 71.40.2.82 18:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slang

I removed the following from the slang section:

The term, crutch, is also used in slang terminology to mean, "Something that is not fashionable or reliable."^{[citation needed]} Example: Those shoes are so crutch. When are you gonna buy some new ones? The term relates to the term, "Lame" which contains a similar if not identical slang meaning.

After searching on google and usenet for phrases such as "is crutch" "so crutch" "very crutch" "totally crutch" "that's crutch" I couldn't find ANY relevant results. Well, unless you count Merriam Webster's Open Dictionary, which contains the same example sentence, word for word. From looking at the dates on the pages, someone presumably saw it there and then copied it here about two weeks later, without verifying it (it's not the same person). If anyone's using this at all, it probably hasn't extended beyond a group of friends, specific school, etc and isn't notable enough to mention here or in wiktionary (where it wasn't added at all). 75.36.128.21 21:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]