Jump to content

User talk:24.253.46.31

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.253.46.31 (talk) at 21:36, 26 December 2007 (lol.. get alife :)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

24.253.46.31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

same reason different retard admin... and hey I run the damn CVU..can't you read..

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=same reason different retard admin... and hey I run the damn CVU..can't you read.. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=same reason different retard admin... and hey I run the damn CVU..can't you read.. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=same reason different retard admin... and hey I run the damn CVU..can't you read.. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.253.46.31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the editor is mentally retarded that blocked me...I claim protection from the handicapped. please revert this erroneous block and tell him that hamas is a terrorist group and he is a terrorist-administrator. thank you for your time.. god bless.. praise jesus and anything else that will get you to revert my block by this infidel..I do not wish to be forced to take out my IP address of vengence..lol..actually I don't really care, but this post sounded fun.. off to lunch.. catch you guys later..julie...call me..you know I love you baby..smooches

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
I hereby present you with this Defender of the Wiki Award for your Heroic efforts to maitain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia! Dreadstar † 16:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You're not even registered, so do not lecture me about Wikipedia rules. Swisspass 22:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did delete, are we not allowed to? We'll manage it in Talk, thanks. Also I am sorry, it's just that sometimes people cause problems and I wasn't sure. Pardon me and thank you for your insight on the article. Swisspass 22:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Hamas page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Superm401 - Talk 22:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is incorrect to say there is a simple, objective NPOV definition of terrorist Wikipedia can use. Not everyone considers Hamas to be a terrorist organization. The article notes clearly that many governments and groups do, but it is inappropriate for Wikipedia to make its own value judgment. Superm401 - Talk 21:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Hamas, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have again been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- The Anome (talk) 21:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having reviewed the history of this user page, you seem to have made a deliberately misleading edit to "award" yourself a barnstar, using another user's name [1]. This, combined with your recent edit history, and repeated bogus edit comments, gives me the impression that your main purpose in editing here currently is to cause disruption. Please desist, as the most likely outcome of continued disruptive editing is likely to be a rapid series of progressively longer blocks of this IP address. -- The Anome (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.253.46.31&oldid=180312236"