Talk:Play N Trade

Video games Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

TheoTown (4 participants)
Redout (video game) (8 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
VoxelStorm (1 participant; relisted)
Gilman Louie (4 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

A Reliable Source?

I'm calling into question the online interview with the CEO of this company, the last listed source. I read the article, the man is clearly biased and convinced that his company is different than other businesses of the same specialty, and his analysis doesn't seem very factual; more ideological, and ideology isn't meant for an encyclopedia. This is just voicing a question and concern, not trying to incite an argument, thanks. What makes that source encyclopaedic? Kb5694 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your evaluation of the source is essentially accurate; it's an interview with the company's CEO, so naturally much of its content is promotional. I've limited the use of the source to only one claim of fact, which I added recently to replace an unsourced claim that Gamestop is the main competitor. I'll try to find a better source, but failing that, I would have no objection to removal of the source (and the sentence it is being used to support) from the article. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 22:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV Tag

The POV tag is for

Unlike most video game franchises, Play N Trade accepts almost any trade, irrespective of age or console compatibility. As a result, the inventory of their stores is quite diverse, ranging from old Atari games to Xbox 360 & Wii titles.

The citations tag could be removed though. Look at the discussion from the deletion page though - it is clear that one of the issues here is pov.Daniel()Folsom ^T|_C|^U 20:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, how about the new version. I rewrote the first sentence and deleted the second. -- Black Falcon 21:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I completely reworded the questionable pov and the pov template, and I added a cite needed template. Looks good.Daniel()Folsom ^T|_C|^U 22:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just edited the page to show current sales figures and stores open for business. ~Mp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.89.164.130 (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]