User talk:Morbidthoughts

Sasha Knox

I'm aware that films can be delayed in release, however that isn't the case here. She's had 30+ films released since June, and most of them aren't flagged as compilations in IAFD. Porn companies aren't known for sitting on films for 10 months which would have to be the case for some of these release dates. Additionally, she's shown up on website press releases over 6 months after her stated retirement date and put her myspace back up. Horrorshowj 23:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Pornography Barnstar
		For not only demanding references on contentious information in countless articles on pornographic performers, but providing them in many cases. Thank you. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aliciaalighatti-avn2006.jpg

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 19:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Yes, I did. Vinh1313 (talk) 21:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou for letting me know.Genisock2 (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:SG01.jpg

Actually, since the image is a Commons image and not a Wikipedia image, you should make your deletion request here. The page also has instructions for Commons speedy deletion procedures and copyvio reporting. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the list of OTRS folks can be found here - "permissions" is the list that would apply to photo copyrights. I personally have found User:Riana and User:Deskana to be very helpful. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and done. I find the deletion request procedure to be overly complicated though. Vinh1313 (talk) 17:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No argument here, it can take a while to get images deleted on Commons. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know the copyright holder of the image? Any chance of his releasing it, or any of his other great photos, under a free license? Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Leyden is my friend and colleague. I'll forward the request for you, but you can always ask him directly on flickr. I also have a substantial library myself beyond my flickr account. I am willing to donate images to fill any gaps in pornproject. However, I don't like to grant CC licenses through flickr itself and would rather upload the picture directly to wikipedia. All you have to do is ask. Vinh1313 (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I deleted the photo at Commons for now, if your friend would like to donate his photo a copy can be re-uploaded later. Sometime soon I'll look through his photos at Commons and put together a request. In the meantime, would you mind contributing a photo of Olivia O'Lovely? The current photo there is a possible copyvio. Take care... Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Pic is up. Vinh1313 (talk) 04:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks great, thanks! I hope you don't mind - I copied that photo to the Commons, along with the other photos you uploaded. The Caylian Curtis photo, especially, was fantastic. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 05:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dana DeArmond

i have a written contract with dana dearmond. her official site is danadearmond.com where would you like me to send you a copy of our contract so that you may verify this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.230.183 (talk) 01:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your contract is simply irrelevant to whether we consider it official. Is she continuing to provide any new materials for it? Is she continuing to endorse it? She says no. If she says it's not official, then it's not official. Your contract is with her not us. If she's contracted to endorse your website, then enforce the contract with her. Wikipedia is not the forum to arbitrate these issues. Vinh1313 (talk) 04:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bobbi starr

Vinh, commenting on your post at Bobbi's Myspace: I am not "pissed", heh. We just had a disagreement. I wanted there to be an article on Bobbi Starr because I like her video's and I wanted to do something back in return (unlike some other guys I am not a pathetic loser who adores pornstars seeing them as a sort of ideal, imaginary girlfriend, going to pornmeetings, corresponding and wanting to know all about their personal life, etc; there is not much to admire about having sex for money, let's be honest). The main point is that she has an article with good information. So my goal is achieved. It's up to others to expand it. In the discussion section I added some more missing but relevant information. For the present I think I have spend enough time on this.Cometappears (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]