User talk:Mhking/Archive 7

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your work with vandalism, but especially tonight (New Years Eve), I, Sharkface217, hereby award you with this barnstar. Good job, man.S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 17


The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 17 • December 15, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features Rains in Washington State cause massive road closures In 2008, all roads will lead to Chicago! Louisiana and Tennessee projects started; Louisiana demoted	State and national updates Leaderboard California New York New Jersey Oklahoma Pennsylvania Wisconsin
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —O bot (t • c) 04:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From 'ModernDiogenes'

From Yourself: Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding
commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Assata Shakur, you will be 
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking (talk) 04:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

===================================================================

My Response: The comment in question was a simple footer in the notes suggesting that the article, which I believe most people with out bias would acknowledge has a particular slant to it and in its totality is not neutral at all, should be considered with a scholarly neutral eye.

IF you find the suggestion of neutrality to be non-neutral than I am afraid I can't speak to you regards this particular issue as you and I obviously have very different ideas of what "neutral" means. Thus having no common ground to find purchase for agreement or compromise.

Thanks for the note though. Happy New Year.

From 'Number631'

Thanks for all the answers!

Complaint

Why are you so counterproductive? Stop threatening me and don't post anything to me anymore. thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.172.231 (talk) 20:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What?

Threatening me after a first-offense? Mellow out. 71.115.195.159 (talk) 22:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

u had a go at me

i thought billie piper was a porn star and u had a go at me

Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School

Hi, I fully understand your delete recommendation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School because the page was in bad shape. However, it has now been rewritten with many references to establish compliance with WP:N. I wonder if you would be good enough to revisit your recommendation, please? TerriersFan (talk) 02:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your reconsideration. TerriersFan (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WTF!?

I did NOT add "incorrect information" to this article. My information was 100% correct. What is wrong with you?--71.203.147.175 (talk) 23:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Periodistas spam warned

Hello, I noticed you spam warned this user for edits to Karen Maron. I removed the blog references, but I'm not sure I see the spam. At any rate, he seems to have stopped now. Thanks, Dloh cierekim 02:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I've left him a message requesting English sources. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 02:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uthradom Thirunal

Hello. u added a tag on Uthradom Thirunal. The article already existed as Uthram Thirunal but that was the wrong name and i created Uthradom Thirunal and merely redirected Uthram Thirunal there. Also i will be adding more information in a few days to the article.Manu —Preceding comment was added at 03:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about Badi School (Panama)

I request the page be undeleted.

With the template post to my talk area you referred to the Wikipedia:Your first article which has a small section Wikipedia:Your first article#And be careful about... which says: "These are articles about places like schools, or streets that are of interest to a relatively small number of people such as alumni or people who live nearby. There is no consensus about such articles, but some will challenge them if they include nothing that shows how the place is special and different from tens of thousands of similar places. Photographs add interest. Try to give local-interest articles local colour. Third-party references are very useful to prove that the subject you are writing about is notable."

Another wikipedia reference addressing school associated articles is Wikipedia:Places of local interest#Creating articles about places of local interest which largely echoes the above but adds: "*Interesting aspects of the activities that go on at that place (e.g. for a school, interesting curricular or extracurricular activities)"

Having a local government use the curriculum of the school as part of city wide extension to the schools offerings of assistance to parents of students seems to be a highly distinguishing quality almost unique in western culture. --Smkolins (talk) 13:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally Wikipedia:Notability (schools) states "At present schools do not have agreed guidelines. This is because several attempts at producing a schools policy have failed." Please note I'm not a member of any prior discussions on what is notable or not about schools. This article presents several specifics which I agree generally are worthwhile but ends "A school article that fails to establish notability will not be deleted, if the school can be confirmed to exist.[2] It would be simply redirected to the appropriate article for the relevant locality or school district (US and Canada only). Thus the article could be later expanded back out into its own article again when sources should become available.[3]"Smkolins (talk) 13:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writers Guild of America Strike

Why are you discriminating against the article I added? It is a serious analysis, and was actually written by a university professor. if you don't like the source, be honest, instead of making false allegations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.83.66 (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP sock

Unfortunately we can't indef-block IPs unless they are open proxys. I kept his block for vandalism, though. jj137 ^♠ 04:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ClipMeet

Six of one and half a dozen of the other, I suppose, but db-bio does cover web content and companies. Either way, the result is hopefully the same. Regards. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 21:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WKYT-TV. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Whether you are correct or not, if it isn't obvious vandalism that you are reverting (which it isn't -- it is a content dispute) you are breaking the 3RR. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WKYT-TV

Please don't call edits such as in WKYT-TV vandalism, as you did in User talk:64.191.180.253. PLease read carefully wikipedia:Vandalism. `'Míkka >t 04:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not mark AFD nominations as minor changes without an edit summary

Please do not mark articles for deletion nominations as minor changes without an edit summary, as you did here. Anybody watching the page needs to know about the nomination, and it should be visible in the revision history of the page so it can be seen the condition of the page when it was nominated. For more details see WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion. Thank you, Rigadoun (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is it possible for a user to mass search usernames, instead of one at a time. I figure Dingbat2007 has other "Rebafan##" accounts and would like to search for all accounts starting with "Rebafan", but am not sure if I can or if an admin can. Is this possible? - NeutralHomer ^T:C 01:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slackcountry

I can certainly understand your wanting to get rid of this article, since I like you doubt that it's a significant neologism, but according to [[1]] neologisms are specifically not eligible for a speedy tag -- I've replaced yours with a PROD tag and trust this meets with your approval. If you have any questions, I'm at your service. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alantica

I Was planning to correct the article i just started it can you give me some time first - Trulystand700 talk —Preceding comment was added at 02:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Corrected Atlantica

Is it fine now i corrected it. Trulystand700 talk —Preceding comment was added at 02:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WWWQ/WNNX

I have restored my edit to both articles, with an additional sentence clarifying the current situation as a current simulcast of Top 40 on both frequencies, with the end date on the 100.5 simulcast of 1/21/08, as announced.

From All Access:

ALL ACCESS has learned that CUMULUS Alternative WNNX (99X)/ATLANTA PD and original morning co-host LESLIE FRAM and JENNERS are leaving as well as midday personality STEVE CRAIG.

CUMULUS co-COO JOHN DICKEY told ALL ACCESS, "Additionally, 99X is moving to the Internet as a stream, and will be an HD2 channel to 99.7. This will be a new and more updated approach to the format as it lives between an Internet brand and visual brand. And, LESLIE may be part of this new venture, or stay on in another capacity.

"Also, Q100 and the BERT SHOW are moving to 99.7 and there will be a new brand launched shortly on 100.5," added DICKEY. He wouldn't confirm what the new brand would be at this time -- nor would any other source.

Concerning that new brand, there is heavy speculation that former crosstown LINCOLN Top 40 WSTR morning duo STEVE & VIKKI would be joining 100.5. Earlier rumors of former WKLS (96 ROCK) morning team REGULAR GUYS appear to speculative in nature at this time.

As soon as the dust settles on this speculation, look for details on ALL ACCESS.

On a separate note, CUMULUS SVP/Programming JAN JEFFRIES told ALL ACCESS, "WYOY (Y101)/JACKSON PD/afternooner JOHN O'LEARY (aka JOHNNY O) will be joining CUMULUS at Q100/ATLANTA as APD/MD/afternoons effective JANUARY 28th. I have worked with JOHN previously while consulting his station when he was the ripe old of 19. A decade later, it is great to renew our association. Q100 PD ROB ROBERTS and I knew from moment one that JOHNNY was the clear choice for this coveted position at one of AMERICA's great radio stations.

"This announcement coincides with other major programming announcements regarding Q100 this week to be made public to the radio audience on MONDAY (1/14)," concluded JEFFRIES. —Preceding unsigned comment added by InDeBiz1 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oi - don't you add that to my talk page, I was adding that he was a negro, just in case some people didn't knjow.