User talk:Armando12

Home

Navigation Bar

User page

Talk!

Edit Count

Userboxes

Graphs•Imgs

Contribs

Sandbox

Welcome to my talk page.

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply).
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BeruBara cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BeruBara cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:812StupidSpoiledWhoreVideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:812StupidSpoiledWhoreVideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Evanescence media

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Evanescence media, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Evanescence media has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Evanescence media, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3K

Hello, thank you for your active participation in our Wikiproject Three Kingdoms! The infobox is a really fine template :) I see you added a userbox declaring yourself as a member in our project, but you haven't written a short description for yourself in our members page. If it doesn't take too much of your time, it would be nice if you can introduce yourself there :) Finally, thank you for doing all the amazing maintenance work around the project when I'm.....not doing anything, heh. _dk 00:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to add a new parameter in your infobox showing when the emperors were in office? Thank you. _dk 03:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And it would be nice if you discussed with us first before making all those wonderful additions to our humble project. I'm talking about the assessment here, we have determined that assessments weren't necessary for our project...until you came along. It's not a big deal, but still. _dk 08:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: {{3K-stub}} has been deleted and replaced with {{ThreeKingdoms-stub}} Dbiel ^(Talk) 05:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Olimar n.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Olimar n.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Changban

Hi there, i notice that you have this up for PR at the main peer review page. I think it would generate a lot more responses at the milhist peer review page. If you want i can move it over for you before i comment on it? Woodym555 13:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have moved it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Battle of Changban and I have transcluded it on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review page. I will take a good look at it tonight for you. Woodym555 18:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Three Kingdoms

hey Armando, thanks for your many edits to Wikipedia:WikiProject Three Kingdoms. You've definitely improved the look & feel of the page. Cheers! --Ling.Nut 03:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I thought you were starting to hate me because of the userbox problem xD. Congrats for you work on Battle of Red Cliffs! I really hope it becomes a FA. Armando.O^{talk • Ev} 03:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We've been around WP:3K for a little while and we all know each others' tendencies etc. Plus we have a history of settling things on Talk. You'll get into the flow of things in a while, but remember that the opinions of respected editors (esp. Nlu but also others in our little gang) are worthy of careful attention. later! --Ling.Nut 03:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your tireless work on Three Kingdoms-related articles, you are awarded the Working Man's Barnstar. --Nlu (talk) 06:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(I assume, based on your user name, that you are male. If you are female, please let me know and I'll change the gender on this (or you can change it yourself).) --Nlu (talk) 06:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'm male. Thanks!!!! Armando.O^{talk • Ev} 23:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The Template Barnstar
		Awarded for creation of some cool new South Park infoboxes. Good work!Swellman (talk) 02:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!!! Armando.O^{talk • Ev} 02:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Waverace1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Waverace1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pikmin 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pikmin 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pikmin forest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pikmin forest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shin Chan 14.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shin Chan 14.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Luigimansion sc.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Luigimansion sc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Love New York (TV series)

Just a heads up, I deleted the revert you did. You're revert added I Love New York 3 with no source. I deleted it per WP:CRYSTAL. Just wanting to let you know :). Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 22:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just noticed that. Fixed just now :D. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 22:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

k! (y) Armando.O^{talk • Ev} 22:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wp Sp.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wp Sp.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WPEV template

First things first, I thought I placed that template in the sandbox...I actually put it live? Ugh, I must stop doing stuff when I'm tired after work. I don't know what I was thinking. In any case, regarding the old template, there is a lot of functionality that can be added, and some that *needs* to be added. It is very very basic. I'll work on it when I have some time...I just ran out of that time earlier. Also, those switches you mentioned, they are very necessary to non-article pages don't receive importance ratings. I don't write code unless it has a specific function, though I admit I do tend to get ahead of myself. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 00:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so the template has been properly updated now, and everything appears to check out...all categories in place, all intended functions operational. A few notes: it is unnecessary to give categories, templates and NA-class material importance ratings, because the template automatically filters those out. I've taken out the need for a disambig category and had it removed; as yet, there are none, and frankly I cannot forsee any possible need for one within the scope of this project. I've removed all additional functionality besides the "attention" flag; this is all that is needed, as any specifications can be described on the article's talk page (and I've worded the bit to say as much). The only real thing added is the "listas" function, which is identical to the DEFAULTSORT function you see in articles. I believe I have taken care of all the articles which would need this parameter. Also, I still don't understand what you mean by the switches duplication functions. I know what every line of code does, and don't see any duplicated effort. If you can point out exactly which section, I'll fix or explain what is going on. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 20:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine, it was purely an optional thing anyway. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 23:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"False" stories in 3 kingdoms

Thanks for your patient work on that article. I'm glad my stopping it from immediate deletion has such good results. Probably the title needs changing as well, "ficticious" seems to give the wrong implication. -- Perhaps: invented, or non-historical, or ahistorical? DGG (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Understanding - Evanescence EP.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Understanding - Evanescence EP.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Understanding - Evanescence EP.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Understanding - Evanescence EP.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		It appears Nlu's already beaten me to the punch, but I believe you deserve another for good measure. Your hard work behind the scenes at WP:3K isn't going unnoticed, Armando. Gamer Junkie 05:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!!! =D Armando.O^{talk · Ev · 3K} 19:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Imaginary - Evanescence EP.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Imaginary - Evanescence EP.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube

I think since it's their own site it's not a copy vio, but I'm not sure. Have taken it out while I look into this. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 18:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have left a question at the copyright advice page. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 18:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link???? Armando.O^{talk · Ev · 3K} 18:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since it is their own channel, either operated by the band or by the label, then that shows implicit authorization and thus is not a copyright violation. It would only be copyvio if someone else had uploaded the video without permission of the video owners. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 20:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ahhhhhhhhh. OK! Armando.O^{talk · Ev · 3K} 20:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Park SVG

I want to make an SVG theme for ktuberling in South Park style. Do you want to help me ? Email: annonim@web.de —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.164 (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure...but what's that¿?¿? and is that ur mail?? Armando.O^{talk · Ev · 3K} 04:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ktuberling is a kid's game where you put together comic figures. see this horribly outdated site for some more information. and annonim@web.de is my e-mail, for real.