Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Pritchett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Etacar11 (talk | contribs) at 14:12, 10 July 2005 (unsigned vote). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Entire text of article is "Jennifer is a University of Texas badass student who will be graduating in Dec. of 05! She is sure to become something of merit and is definitely someone you should get to know while you can. She will be a very notable Pi Phi, and more so than any of the ones listed above." Damn it, this sort of stuff really needs to be a speedy. jglc | t | c 7 July 2005 18:43 (UTC)

Kelly McNeil is also a non-notable KKG member whose article was created by an anonIP with no wikification or outside validation. Looks like some sorority girls messing around. jglc | t | c 7 July 2005 18:47 (UTC)
  • Delete all. I feel richer for knowing that Jennifer likes PB and mayo sandwiches. --Scimitar 7 July 2005 18:55 (UTC)
  • Delete Kappa Kappa Gamma SUCKS!! Haha. No seriously, delete. --Moritz 7 July 2005 20:53 (UTC)
  • Delete. A speedy would be fine (I won't tell if you don't). -R. fiend 7 July 2005 20:58 (UTC)
  • Delete and vote on your choice of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/1 or Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/2 --Carnildo 7 July 2005 21:12 (UTC)
  • Like, Delete Jennifer Pritchett, Kelly McNeil, and any other sororicruft, but keep Kappa Kappa Gamma. I know it's not part of the nomination, but since the article is Wikilinked in the header, I thought it was at first – just thought I'd point this out to anyone who's as dense as I am. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL July 8, 2005 01:26 (UTC)
    • My apologies: good catch. jglc | t | c 8 July 2005 02:17 (UTC)
  • Delete nn sorority vanity. Obviously the sorority itself can stay (at USC we called it "Visa, Visa, Mastercard" ;) ), but these girls aren't notable. --Etacar11 8 July 2005 02:52 (UTC)
  • "Keep" this because this sort of thing gives Wikipedia its charm. (Unsigned vote by Keldreth, user's only edit)