Talk:Amine
Chemistry Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Quaternary Amines
Should really add quaternary amines here.
- Josh Cherry 22:40, 13 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- a "quaternary amine" being ...?--Smokefoot 22:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Sentence problem
This sentence is giving me trouble, mostly b/c I'm not an organic chemist, but if it's confusing to me it's likely to be confusing to others. Anyway I hope someone could clarify and then update it in the article:
"However, if any of the carbons bonded to the nitrogen that is part of a carbonyl group, then the compound is considered an amide rather than an amine."
Does this mean -- if any of the carbons in the 'R' group are, in turn, part of a carbonyl group, then the whole deal is an 'amide' instead of an 'amine'
- basically 'that is' is ambiguously referring to one of 'the nitrogen' or 'the carbons'
Thx.
- Harold MacKiernan 5 Jan 2006 23:11 PST
I'm pretty sure that any carbonyl group adjacent to an N, NH or NH2 makes it an amide. Perhaps:
"However, if any of the carbons bonded to the nitrogen are also part of a carbonyl group, then the compound is considered an amide rather than an amine." Anand 21:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Drawing
Nice drawing for the nitrile and amide reductions by LAH, but you might revise the nitriles so that R-C-N are linear in the starting material.--Smokefoot 04:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
also the amide forming reaction from acid chloride and an alkyl amine is incorrect as one CH2 was lost.--Smokefoot 00:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Properties as bases
the article says that:
The nitrogen atom features a lone electron pair that can bind H+ to form an ammonium ion R3NH+.
The wiki page about ammonium ion says that its formula is NH4+.
Could somebody correct this ?
What is the name of R3NH+ ?
--Colonna 13:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- "Ammonium" can refer either to NH4+ itself or more generally to compounds with four groups attached to a positively charged nitrogen - R4N+. NH4+ is just the case where the four R groups are hydrogens and R3NH+ is the case where only one is. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
huh?
i dont get this at ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!--...02:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)24.82.214.224 (talk)Emmybear26