User talk:Scartol/Archives/2008/February

Thanks!

Thank you for offering to watch over pages while I attempt to write something publishable, which can then be quoted on Wikipedia! :) Awadewit | talk 05:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations! :)

I just saw the good news about Old Man Goriot — yeay! Congratulations on a wonderfully vivid article, Willow (talk) 12:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Let me add my congratulations - sorry I didn't get to add my effusive praise at the FAC. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that I will have another opportunity. :) Awadewit | talk 16:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Street Children

Greetings, I recently embarked on a complete re-write of the Wikipedia article on street children: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_children
Before I did this I made a few contributions on the article's talk page (the three at the bottom of the page): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Street_children
However, I had a growing feeling that I had so many quibbles with the article that I should attempt a completely new version rather than trying to fix what was there. The new article is about 90% finished but I suspect there is a lot wrong with it. And while I worry away at what remains to be written I would appreciate any criticism that can help me to make this a better and more Wikipedian article.
My version of the article may be found on my user talk page.
Thanks. Almudo (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Almudo

Jena Six peer review

I noticed that you put your name down on the peer review volunteers page as willing to work with articles on "sociology, economics, political activity, [and] international organizations." I'm not quite sure as to whether this would fall under those categories, but would you mind checking out the Jena Six article and its accompanying peer review? We've been chipping away at it, and some independent feedback would be quite useful. Thanks, Kakofonous (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:LCH Intro

A tag has been placed on Template:LCH Intro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Labor/Organizers

A tag has been placed on Template:Labor/Organizers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Labor/Organizers2

A tag has been placed on Template:Labor/Organizers2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Boydell Shakespeare Gallery

Since you've already read Boydell Shakespeare Gallery, I was wondering if you might offer an opinion regarding the first section on "Shakespeare in the 18th century". Another peer reviewer has suggested that it should be cut down. I am obviously too close to the article to make these decisions any more and would appreciate some feedback from others. I am reticent to make any sweeping changes at this late stage (the article is almost ready for FAC), but if it would improve the article, obviously I would do so. Thanks. The discussion is here. Awadewit | talk 03:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Requesting a peer review of ANAK Society

Hi, Eric. I noticed you are listed as a peer review volunteer for social science and society articles. I'm hoping to get some feedback on an article in that category, ANAK Society. The ANAK Society is a secret society at the Georgia Institute of Technology and I'm hoping to get it to FA quality. Would you be interested in reviewing this article? Thanks for your time. MaxVeers (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)