User talk:AJmed

Speedy deletion of Abongo (Roy) Obama

A tag has been placed on Abongo (Roy) Obama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a few articles have been written about him! How can this be not notable? AJmed (talk) 19:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Abongo (Roy) Obama

Not notable? Are you kidding?

I put up a request for a deletion review.

This article was deleted less than a minute after it was put up, despite the fact that included sources such as the article in Investor's Business Daily http://biz.yahoo.com/ibd/080115/issues.html?.v=1 that raises the fact that some might be unconfortable with a president who has a half-brother who self-identifies as a fundamentalist Muslim. Abongo has gotten a lot of attention recently and I am curious why there is no information about him on Wikipedia. Oh. A mention in the Chicago Sun Times. http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/familytree/545461,BSX-News-wotreex09.article and another http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59598 and the Toronto Sun www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Coren_Michael/2008/01/26/4795002.php

AJmed (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Great, next time put those in the article themselves, and it is fully notable. Unless it is of course classification as a WP:CSD G10 violation on attack pages concerning living persons. That was the reason that User:Roger Davies deleted it in the first place. Here is the origional reason: ‎(G10: Pure attack page or negative unsourced BLP).

Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, and had the sources in the article. User Roger Davies can put whatever reason he wants up but I didn't write anything that wasn't in the sourced articles. Watch me try again and get it deleted in less than three seconds. --AJmed (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section G10 of the WP:CSD does not rely on sources if the page is a pure attack. WP:BLP clearly states that criticism is allowed, but That it must NOT overwhelm the article. In short, pure negative articles are not allowed. You are of course free to re-create the article, but make sure it complies to the BLP guidelines before doing so. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IDONTLIKEIT ONLY applies when there is no valid reason given for a deletion. WP:BLP violations are more then a valid reason to warrant a speedy deletion. In fact, WP:BLP even overrides some of the lesser policies on article notability. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop pasting the content of the deleted page to other pages. If you continue to do this, you may be blocked for disruption. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 20:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a lot of patience, but now your pushing it.

Dont worry my friend. Obamists like Excirial who coddle and protect their Savior cannot stop knowledge. I have taken your cause on my site: http://www.songwave.com/articles/abongo-obama.htm and with your help we can be #1 in Google. Its time to expose Abongo. Wikiepedia hawks like Excirial think they control knowledge but they dont. They are just irrational blind followers. If they ban you from wikipedia, consider it an honor my friend. this website is a cesspool of errancy and bias...not even worthy of the national enquirer. So please put up some links to my page to get it out on Google and get it ranked. I'm using your articles as references.