Jump to content

Talk:Antisymmetry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.183.97.133 (talk) at 08:17, 6 March 2008 (Scientific context requested). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Question

When defining c-command in the first section, the article says that AP does not exclude BP, but, from the definition of exclusion higher up it seems that AP should exclude BP. Will someone explain this to me?--SurrealWarrior 11:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific context requested

Is this theory considered mainstream, experimental, kooky, or what? -- Beland 19:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


It depends on who you ask. There are certainly a lot of people assume Antisymmetry, but there are more who don't. It has a large enough following to be taken seriously, even if it's not the commonly accepted doctrine on linearization. Note, though, that there still isn't really a generally agreed upon theory of linear order. 66.183.97.133 (talk) 08:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]