User talk:Drewcifer3000/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

WP:LOTD

Congratulations. Gwen Stefani discography was among the leading votegetters at WP:LOTD and will be recognized as list of the day twice. If you have any date preferences get back to me by the 26th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 02:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Melissa Auf der Maur picture

Hey, when did you take that picture of Melissa? It says that you were the original author Speedboy Salesman (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Nah it doesn't matter that much, I just wanted to congratulate that person on taking an amazing photo, of a very gorgeous woman ;) Speedboy Salesman (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Merge

Hi. :) Just wanted to point out that when we merge an article, we place it into Category:Redirects from merges by adding the template {{R from merge}}. I'm working on adding it to this little run of NIN songs, so you don't worry about that; this is just in case you run into this situation again. That keeps the articles from being deleted, which is necessary for GFDL compliance. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I've run into a lot of these merges, so I've gotten used to them. :D There's about a billion different things to remember, it seems, when editing Wikipedia. Just about the time I get one process down, I run into a whole new one I get to figure out. :/ --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Carrie Underwood discography

I'd closed the FLC nomination because obviously, there was still dispute over the way the article should be presented. I'd noticed you suggested we should vote on the format, which I must admit was a good idea. So I was wondering if you would perhaps voice your opinion at the talk page here. Cheers. σмgнgσмg^(talk) 09:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Nine Inch Nails Project

If you meant the stray marks at the bottom, I removed them. And the new template should be updated about twice a week to reflect the current status of the articles. If you meant some other variation on the preexisting page, I'm afraid I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. John Carter (talk) 02:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I'm not sure what you mean. In the prior version as I see it, the assessment box was aligned to the right with the members box below it and aligned to the left. Now, the assessment box and members list are both aligned to the left. But let me see if I can change the locations of the boxes back. John Carter (talk) 02:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of recessions in the United States

I've responded to your concerns. Please close items that have been resolved. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

GA Sweeps update

This is a form message being sent out to all of the GA sweeps reviewers. Thank you for all of your dedicated work in the difficult and time-consuming task of ensuring the quality of articles within the GA project. Many reviewers have taken time out of reviewing articles at WP:GAN (this may be one factor in the expansion of the backlog), writing articles, and probably getting some sleep! I have sent this message out to update you on our current progress and to remind you to please keep up with completing your reviews and updating GARs/holds. As of March 1, 2008, we have swept 20% of the 2,808 GAs we started with. At our current progress, all of the articles will be assessed in just under three years (based on when we started). If we want to complete the sweeps sooner, we need to continue reviewing at a higher rate (consider doing one or two more reviews a week or whatever you feel comfortable with) and inviting new, experienced reviewers. If you are taking a break, focusing on GAN, writing your own GAs, or are already reviewing articles like crazy, I still want to thank you for all of your hard work and hope you are pleased about our current progress. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Tiananmen Square self-immolation incident

Further to your review of the above, there is a new debate raging on its talk page about one user's attempt to change the name of the "Government actions" section to "Government propaganda". Your views as a GA reviewer would be much appreciated. Thanks, Ohconfucius (talk) 01:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. Ohconfucius (talk) 02:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)