Talk:Lake Tarpon

Lakes Unassessed

	Lakes portal Lake Tarpon is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Florida Stub‑class

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Florida may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Candidate for speedy deletion?

I don't know if I didn't cite my source correctly or what, but I clearly gave credit to the source I retrieved my information from. --Nathan Dolan 02:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it

I vote for keeping this article. It's a short article about a lake, which is notable for its geographic significance alone. However, I think what they are looking for is some "re-wording" and "re-writing" of the material. So don't delete it, just re-write it.--Paul McDonald 02:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

I don't see any problem with the article it seems to have a fair amount of relavance. Really not much of a argument for deletion--St.daniel 02:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Removed

I removed the nomination. Please keep in mind that the revision I nominated, the article was a word for word copy of the external link.Michael Greiner 02:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]