White flight

White flight is a term for the demographic trend where working- and middle-class white people move away from increasingly racial-minority inner-city neighborhoods to white suburbs and exurbs. The phenomenon was first named in the United States, but has occurred in other countries as well. Some scholars have noted the impact of redlining, mortgage discrimination, and racially restrictive covenants on white flight: these factors denied or increased the cost of services, such as banking and insurance, to residents in minority inner-city neighborhoods. Some social scientists suggest that the historical processes of suburbanization and decentralization are instances of white privilege that have contributed to contemporary patterns of environmental racism. In some of the largest cities in the United States, the trend started to reverse itself in the 1990s through a process called gentrification.

White flight in the United States

White flight has taken place in nearly every major American city, especially since the end of World-War II and the ensuing economic and baby booms. A variety of factors during this period allowed for the explosive growth of suburbs and demographic change in cities, including the creation of high-speed highways and suburban parkways, which greatly reduced the travel time between suburbs and downtowns and bypassed some city neighborhoods.

The effects of the phenomenon have been significant, particularly in the cities of Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Detroit, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, California, Washington DC, Memphis, Houston, Cleveland, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Newark, New Orleans, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and Minneapolis, all of which lost more than half of their white populations; but it has affected every metropolitan area in the United States.

History

In the years after World War II, many white Americans began to move away from inner cities to newer suburban communities. Major cities had experienced tight housing markets during the war years along with an influx of blacks seeking war work. Racism, economic and social pressure as well as the popularity of the automobile all contributed to white flight. Whites also left the city because they thought that suburban communities, with their new housing stock and open spaces, were more desirable places to live, and due to economic conditions or racial discrimination, blacks were frequently unable to follow. White flight was made easier by state and federal governments paying for highways to carry suburbanites to work in cities where the jobs remained (the National Defense and Interstate Highway Act and its successors). The creation of these highways in some cases divided and isolated black neighborhoods from goods and services, many times within industrial corridors. For example Birmingham’s interstate highway system attempted to maintain the racial boundaries that had been established by the city’s 1926 racial zoning law. The construction of interstate highways through black neighborhoods in the city led to significant population loss in those neighborhoods and is associated with an increase in neighborhood racial segregation.

Blockbusting

Main article: Blockbusting

Another important aspect of this migration was the phenomenon of "blockbusting". Real estate agents would facilitate the sale of a house in a white neighborhood to a black family by subterfuge, often buying the house themselves, or using a white proxy and reselling, perhaps at a reduced price, to the black family. A panic, fanned by the real estate agents and the media, would then ensue among some white homeowners, who feared that their property values would drop — which they did as soon as they began selling in large numbers, generating large commissions for the agents. The real estate agents would then sell at higher prices to the incoming black families, reaping the profits of the price difference as well as the sales commissions. It was not uncommon for the racial makeup of a neighborhood to be completely changed in the space of a few years by this process.

Urban decay

Main article: Urban decay

Broken Promises:John Fekner © 1980 Charlotte Street Stencils South Bronx, New York. Although it has since been revitalized, the South Bronx became a famous example of urban decay and abandonment in the 70s and 80s.

Urban decay is a process by which a city, or a part of a city, falls into a state of disrepair. It may be accelerated by white flight. It is characterized by depopulation, property abandonment, high unemployment, fragmented families, political disenfranchisement, crime, and desolate and unfriendly urban landscapes. Urban decay was associated with Western cities, especially North America and parts of Europe during the 1970s and 1980s. During this time period major changes in global economies, transportation, and government policies created conditions that fostered urban decay. Many North American cities have experienced an outflux of population to city suburbs or exurbs, as in the case of white flight.

Governmental aspects of white flight

Due to the nature of American local governmental structure, white flight enabled people who moved into the suburbs to create new municipalities outside the jurisdiction of the original city, without any legacy costs of maintaining existing infrastructure. However, this was balanced by the need to enhance the suburban infrastructure to support the larger immigrant population. For example, new schools, roads, water and sewer lines, and firehouses had to be built.

The federal government contributed to the early decay of inner city neighborhoods and white flight by withholding mortgage capital and making it difficult for these neighborhoods to attract and retain families able to purchase homes. By manipulating market incentives, the federal government drew middle-class whites to the suburbs.

By the enactment of restrictive zoning, these new entities could ensure that few poor (or in some cases middle-class) emigrants could afford to move into their enclaves. Such municipalities were incorporated by the hundreds on the peripheries of cities. The details varied according to state statutes and local politics. Milwaukee, for example, was able to annex parts of surrounding towns, including the former Town of Granville and thus expand to a greater extent than many landlocked cities (then-Mayor Frank P. Zeidler inveighed against the destructive effect of the "Iron Ring" of new municipalities incorporated in the post-World War II decade). At the same time, many semi-rural areas such as Oak Creek, South Milwaukee and Franklin incorporated to escape annexation during this era, after state laws were changed to allow such incorporation by non-urban regions near Milwaukee which did not fit the traditional minimum standards for incorporation.

Schools and busing

Main article: Desegregation busing

White flight has also had an impact on education. The landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education ordered the desegregation of schools. American cities witnessed growing disparities in the quality of education. The Supreme Court subsequently mandated in the 1971 decision of Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education the institution of busing of black students to mainly formerly all-white schools in the suburbs, and vice versa. Beginning in the mid-1970s, some minority students (especially blacks) were transported miles from poorer core cities to newer affluent suburbs. As Justice William Douglas observed in his dissent in Milliken v. Bradley (1974), "The inner core of Detroit is now rather solidly black; and the blacks, we know, in many instances are likely to be poorer…" A similar 1977 Federal decision, Penick v The Columbus Board of Education, accelerated white flight from Columbus, Ohio to its suburbs. According to sociologist Cardell K. Jacobson, opposition to integration was strongest among people who did not themselves have children in public schools, and in particular among those who already had children in parochial schools.

Busing and desegregation orders in education had also led to a further, non-geographical white flight: out of the public school systems subject to desegregation orders, and into private schools. For example, in 1970, when a federal court ordered desegregation of the public schools of the Pasadena Unified School District (in Pasadena, California), the proportion of white students in those schools reflected the proportion of whites in the community, 54 percent and 53 percent, respectively. After desegregation began, a large number of whites in the upper and middle classes could afford private schooling and so pulled their children from mixed public schools. As a result, by 2004 Pasadena was home to sixty-three private schools, which educated one-third of all school-aged children in the city, and the proportion of white students in the public schools had fallen to 16 percent. The superintendent of Pasadena USD characterized them as being to whites "like the bogey-man" and mounted policy changes and a publicity drive to induce affluent whites to put their children back into the public schools.

White flight frequently had the effect of dramatically altering the racial demographics of public school systems in relatively short periods of time. For example, Baltimore's Clifton Park Junior High School had 2,023 whites and 34 blacks just after desegregation; 10 years later, it had 2,037 blacks and 12 whites. Garrison Junior High School in Northwest Baltimore went from 2,504 whites and 12 blacks to 297 whites and 1,263 blacks in the same period.

White flight in recent decades

Some parts of the New York and Los Angeles metropolitan areas with emerging Latin American and Asian populations are experiencing a new phenomenon where "white flight" neighborhoods that became mostly black in population are now experiencing a black flight by blacks as new immigrants move in.

In Florida and Texas, as in California, the immigrant influx is creating a Democratic future. Because most of the White Americans leaving California have tended to be politically conservative and the Democratic Party has historically been considered to be in a far stronger position among Latin American and Asian immigrants, the large-scale immigration and white flight have helped to transform California into a stronghold of the Democratic Party.

The major 12th Street Riot in Detroit in 1967 and during the following year, after the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., contributed to white flight in that city. Now, the city of Detroit is over 80% black; a majority of its neighboring suburbs, such as Livonia, Dearborn, and Warren, are predominantly white.

White Flight in California

California is the U.S.' most diverse state in terms of racial and ethnic makeup, and in the 2000 US census, non-Hispanic whites became a minority the first time in state history (less than 50 percent) of the population, but African-Americans aren't the sole minority in the state where 8 percent of the people are black. California is considerably a more multicultural diverse and tolerant state in race relations, except the phenomenon of white flight hasn't skipped them.

White flight in Southern California

The forces and groups involved in white flight in Southern California are distinct from those in other areas due to the region's demography and history. Many whites once lived in urban neighborhoods in Los Angeles before departing the city in large numbers after the 1965 Watts Riots. This trend actually began before the riots but it accelerated in their wake. The 1992 L.A. Riots produced a similar reaction across the Los Angeles metropolitan area, but included a massive influx of lower-income African-Americans leaving the city.

The most common minority group in California and the western US are Mexican American and other Latin American groups, most of them arrived through immigration, either legally or illegally, since the 1970's into the Los Angeles area and across Southern or Central California. In the late 20th century, white Anglos (non-Hispanics) increasingly moved out of the L.A. metro area while the population and percentage of Latino/Hispanic residents increased and the unincorporated town of East Los Angeles and eastern ends of L.A. city proper, the historic inner city district for Mexican and other Hispanic Americans has grew larger and more apparent.

In addition, during the 1990s and 2000s, many blacks have continued to move out of the historically African American communities (now have Latino majorities due to high rates of immigrants from Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean moved in) such as Inglewood and Compton to |inland communities such as Fontana, Rialto, Moreno Valley, Palmdale, Orange County, and Ventura County. (See black flight.)

In San Diego, the pattern of white Anglo flight from the city to neighboring suburbs to the east and north since the 1950s has reversed in the 1990s by gentrified sections of downtown and coastal sections of the city, but the once mostly African-American East side and mainly Hispanic south side are becoming more white due to real estate buyouts of previous owners' homes. Southern San Diego (i.e. Chula Vista, National City and Imperial Beach along with the border entry San Ysidro) has relatively became popular places for white Anglo home buyers, since black Americans, and Latino and Asian immigrants outnumbered whites in these cities in the late 20th century.

White flight in Northern California

Another form of white flight is also taking place in many parts of Northern California, such as the western suburbs of San Jose, California. White flight, though taking place at a slower pace, is also affecting high-income upper-class neighborhoods that are becoming increasingly Asian American. In this case, however, the white flight does not result in socio-economic problems for the affected communities. The influx of non-whites whose socio-economic status is at least as high, if not higher, than that of previous white residents compensates for the loss in white population. Furthermore this trend tends to affect upscale enclaves such as Cupertino, Saratoga or, in Southern California San Marino. These cities are expected to have income grow significantly and become more upper-class than they are today.

San Francisco and nearby Oakland are the only two US major cities where whites grew more in percentage, despite Oakland has the largest percentage of African-Americans (over 30 percent, down from 50% in the 1980 census) in the western US (west of Texas). After 60 years of a large black American percentage, Oakland is again fashionable for wealthy whites, while many lower-middle class blacks relocated out of Oakland to nearby areas (Contra Costa, San Joaquin, Solano and Stanislaus counties) are popular destinations for African-American middle class home buyers in the last 20 years to boost the counties' black percentages.

And San Francisco's formerly all-black, as well previously Latino and even Asian-American (Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean and Southeast Asian) ethnic sections has transformed into reclaimed: white areas: their homes are purchased by upper-income professional white home buyers during the region's real estate booms in the 1990s and 2000s. The majority of San Francisco bay area's Asians live in San Mateo County instead of the city, while more head to the San Jose/Santa Clara and east Bay areas, and even to the Sonoma and Napa Valley areas.

Sacramento, the state capital with a more conservative flavor than the notably liberal SF Bay area, appears to be more racially diverse with higher percentages of black Americans (20%) and Latinos (30-40%) in their city than widely perceived "diverse" San Francisco, now over 50 percent white versus Sacramento being 30 percent. Also some demographers placed Latinos (of any race, including "white") and some Asian-Americans identified themselves to further assimilated as "white", therefore the "white flight" issue of northern California is questionable.

Outside the United States

South Africa

The phenomenon is also found in South African cities, most notably Johannesburg, Pretoria and Durban, which saw a mass influx of Black African people into the inner cities during the final years of apartheid, and from which white people fled in great numbers to the suburbs (or out of the country altogether).

New Zealand

In some areas of New Zealand, there has been a gradual process of white flight, in response to mass urbanisation of Māori and arrivals of Pacific Islander guest workers between the 1950s and 1970s, though in Auckland the process has largely been in reverse since the 1980s, with European New Zealanders moving to previously Māori and Pacific Islander neighbourhoods such as Ponsonby, Grey Lynn and Kingsland. Similar gentrification trends have occurred in Wellington inner city suburbs like Thorndon, Newtown, and Aro Valley. White flight has also significantly affected many areas of Rotorua, with the phenomenon being blamed for the cities' slide into third world conditions.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, particularly England, there is evidence of simultaneous ethnic minority dispersal and segregation: in the 1980s and 1990s, minority groups grew rapidly (in percentage terms) in many suburban neighbourhoods and smaller towns that were formerly almost devoid of non-whites, but minorities also grew strongly (in numerical terms) in the inner urban districts of first immigrant settlement. Simultaneously, white populations in many of these urban centers declined (over 600,000 between 1997 and 2007 in London alone), either because of counter urbanisation or, in some parts of the country, general regional decline.

While many skilled working class/ lower middle class whites have moved out of the less desirable areas of east, southeast and west London to suburban communities in (respectively) Essex, Kent and Surrey, this has been tempered in central London by rapid gentrification. However, in outlying industrial areas such as Newham, Woolwich and Hounslow, which are not seen as attractive to young professionals, demographics have been skewed to the extent that white people are in some cases a minority. This is a new phenomenon in urban Britain.

Industrial towns and cities with large south Asian populations such as Oldham and Rochdale in Greater Manchester, Nelson, Blackburn and Burnley in Lancashire, Bradford, Dewsbury and Keighley in West Yorkshire, Slough in the South East, and Leicester in the Midlands also show evidence of white flight. Ethnic minorities in these areas have experienced strong demographic growth (a result of young age structure, the high fertility of some minority groups, and continued immigration), gradually expanding to new districts adjacent to their areas of first settlement. Meanwhile, white communities have been moving away from these older, less attractive urban centres to suburbs and small towns. However, whether segregation is increasing has been open to debate.Trevor Phillips, head of the UK Commission for Equalities and Human Rights, and Dr Mike Poulsen, an Australian-based academic, have claimed that whites and ethnic minorities are becoming more segregated in Britain; a number of British researchers including Prof Ceri Peach, Prof Danny Dorling and Dr Ludi Simpson have argued that racial segregation is either stable or declining.

Australia

In Australia, comparable trends have taken place around the areas of Australia's greatest immigration inflows, particularly Sydney. In that city, Anglo-Celtic Australians have left the south-western suburbs in response to growing concentrations of Asian immigrants, and have relocated to outer suburban areas, notably Penrith and the northern coastal area of Gosford-Wyong. These growth areas have remained predominantly Anglo-Celtic. It should be noted that gentrification in Australia refers to wealthier people moving into traditionally working class, often migrant areas and renovating properties (for example, Melbourne suburbs such as Collingwood or Prahran); these areas often have not experienced anything comparable to white flight for over a century, but rather had been continuously working class until the 1970s or 80s.

Sweden

Particularly in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö, there is a high concentration of immigrant differing from each neighbourhood. In some areas, immigrants form a majority of 90%. While Swedes mostly reside in areas with only a very few immigrants. The cities are split in two, where one part is predominantly Swedish and the other part immigrants.

Gentrification

Main article: Gentrification

The opposing social trend of more prosperous social groups moving into an inner city area and displacing the existing residents is called gentrification. See Gentrification#The_role of certain social groups.

See also

• Urban decay
• Xenophobia
• Ethnic succession theory
• Planned shrinkage

References

• Gamm, Gerald (1999). Urban Exodus: Why the Jews Left Boston and the Catholics Stayed Harvard University Press.
• Kruse, Kevin M. (2005), White Flight: The Strategies, Ideology, and Legacy of Segregationists in Atlanta Southern Spaces.
• Kruse, Kevin M. (2005), White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Lupton, R. and Power, A. (2004) 'Minority Ethnic Groups in Britain'. CASE-Brookings Census Brief No.2, London: LSE.
• Seligman, Amanda I. (2005), Block by Block: Neighborhoods and Public Policy on Chicago's West Side Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Wiese, Andrew. (2006) "African American Suburban Development in Atlanta" Southern Spaces.