User talk:Neverquick

Development of religion

Hi, you did not provide an explanation for your edit. Muntuwandi 18:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I need an explanation? I thought it was vandalism, so I reverted it. If I need to do anything else, tell me what I need to do, cause I'm pretty new here.--Neverquick 18:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was not vandalism, there is an active dispute regarding the content on the article. Muntuwandi 18:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the misconception. At least we can always revert everything.--Neverquick 18:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies

YEAH! COOKIES!!!!!! YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY!!!!!!!! Thank you so much Smilez, I thought I was going to starve! --Neverquick 15:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

{{uw-vandalism2}}, removed.

Check my talk page, I've replied ;) Anthøny 19:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, man. --Neverquick 19:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I'm also sorry about me posting stuff a friend of mine was trying to be funny, it wont happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.222.52 (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its nothing to be worried about.--Neverquick (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the erroneous warning - it was a matter of me hitting the wrong VandalProof button. I reverted my edit as soon as I realized my mistake. Hope no offence was taken. CounterFX (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think nothing of it, sir or madam. I was not offended at all. I understand that these things happen (in fact, the whole reason for the warning being removed above was for that same reason.). Thank you for clearing things up so quickly.--Neverquick (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moeller High School

I noticed that you'd reverted Moedude68's edits to Moeller High School. Thanks; however, "mythical" is actually the technical term for the high school football national championship, because the "championship" is actually a computer program, so it's entirely a myth. I didn't realize that until recently, either. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Thats weird. Thanks for informing me, I thought that was an odd description.--Neverquick (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TW

I see you are using Twinkle my brother. Your revert counts shall ascend to the heavens. Smilesfozwood (talk) 15:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added rollback to your account too, for even faster reverting. Read WP:ROLL for appropriate uses of this feature. Cheers, NoSeptember 17:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Excellent job....

I must say...you reverting that cigar article I vandalised was so quick it was unbelieveable, I came back on the page and my work was gone! Absolutely superb! With people like you around Wikipedia really is a great website. Keep it up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.83.155 (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! I thank you for actually saying something constructive, instead of vandalizing my page like someone else did. I'm not sure if this comment is pure sarcasm or praise, but both are welcome!--Neverquick (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need help figuring out what version to use

Grand Palais was vandalized today along with Effiel Tower which you reverted. Please look at the user contributes. Looks like this one IP address has been vandalizing lots of different things recently. But I am to new here to figure out how to revert to the appropriate version since they pulled out different parts of the article at different points. Thanks C. Williams (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, someone else took care of it. Too new to figure out that mess any can not understand why someone else would want to deface wiki. Suppose you are used to it. shrug. My mother raised me better. :) C. Williams (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I dod not respond quickly, I have some very pressing matters outside of Wikipedia. I'm happy that someone else gave you the help you needed. If you need anymore help, just ask any admin. I'm sure they'll give it to you.

Futurama

You are an idiot: the original is of Jean-Jacques Perrey. Listen to it and don't tell shit! --88.64.91.102 (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be an idiot must be hard.

--88.64.91.102 (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If thats the case, I'm sorry. The name change seemed to drastic to have made any sense. If you had told me my error with a little bit of understanding, I would have been happy to correct it, but I must ask you not to insult editors. Thank you.--Neverquick (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohaithar

Click on the "WILL" in "YOU WILL DIE" on your userpage and see what it links to :p — Nova Dog — (contribs) 02:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that when I made the page. I didn't know that articles where made for those words in CAPS at the time.--Neverquick (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fooled Barnstar

		The Fooled Barnstar
		I award Neverquick the Fooled Barnstar because I, ComputerGuy890100, fooled you with my latest trick! — ComputerGuy89 0 100 02:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was late :P — ComputerGuy89 0 100 02:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, a barnstar to mark just how gullible I am...Oh well, it looks pretty!--Neverquick (talk) 03:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gibsonrb3

I see that you too are having a bit of a problem with him/her. Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} 03:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that he has kept creating that page despite it being deleted every time. He's made them all rather quickly.--Neverquick (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyril P. Callister CSD

Actually, he did invent Vegemite. I can add a few sources in a minute. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I thought it was nonsense. Good job spotting that on your part. The CSD tag can be removed.--Neverquick (talk) 03:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have to admit that it took a second all right :O). Tell you what, I'll add a few things to bring it up to a decent stub level in a few minutes. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 04:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure.--Neverquick (talk) 04:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oy... who would have thought that there was so much on the invention of Vegemite. Who would have thought that Vegemite has its own MySpace page? And who would have thought that I would doing anything about it as I have only eaten the damn stuff once and it was one time too many? :O) Australia owes me big time!FlowerpotmaN·(t) 06:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would never have guessed. I've never seen a can of it.--Neverquick (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DS PSP War

this is not right. Nowhere on Wikipedia does it say that I cannot quote a magizine. If you can fond that then I shall let it be deleted without a fight--Kingrock (talk) 05:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's a quote with attribution, I did not deem it infringing enough to delete it speedily. However, I have nominated it for deletion; discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DS PSP War. —C.Fred (talk) 13:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, my mistake. Sorry about that.--Neverquick (talk) 14:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy Deletion Criteria for Burnout Racing Team

You see, its a fictional racing team that you never meet. Notice the fictional.--BRTman666 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

I redirected it to Burnout Paradise, because I don't see why it needs it's own article.--Neverquick (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you at least put something about it in the article? --BRTman666 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

That would be good, but I have never played the game, so I don't know what to write about.--Neverquick (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to worry, i shall do it. --BRTman666 (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

Great.--Neverquick (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :-) --BRTman666 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

its a npov edit

this is an encyclopedia, right? if you dont use the word fictitious, it leads people to believe that black magic exists, which is fine, if you can source it from a source that most would consider verifiable (new york times?).76.67.56.106 (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out what I said on the articles talk page.--Neverquick (talk) 19:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]