Jump to content

Talk:Human genetics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 04:04, 27 March 2008 (Signing comment by 64.113.91.189 - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Wikiproject MCB


the human genome project is the newest upcoming discovery and milestone that mankind has imprinted in the sands of time .

This is the worst article on wikipedia. someone fix it.

It's pretty bad, but it doesn't touch the suckiness of Star Wars fan films. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supernerd 10 (talkcontribs) 16:24, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
Its amazing how many 'worst' articles there are on wikipedia, or is it possible there are a large number of hyperbolic critics. Wikipedia has guidelines on the code of conduct.
I think the article needs some help.Pdeitiker 00:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A genetic-stub has been added.

other article?

Is there some other article somewhere about human genetics? This one is pretty thin for such a big topic. Jonathan Tweet 16:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Having six fingers is a genetically dominant trait? That doesn't sound right at all... 71.61.235.84 08:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Genes and behavior

This is missing critical information. Namely http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-4_Euthanasia_Program Not just sterilization but actual killing took place. Killing would leave a zero chance to reproduce. With the reported 250,000 genetically inferior killed , no one has studied the supposed cleansing effect on the human race ?--Mark v1.0 (talk) 19:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

THe main picture for this article seems that it good be better. Does anyone have any suggestions for a better a picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrpatel08 (talkcontribs) 00:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas

Does anyone have any feedback or ideas to improve on the article and make it better. Also does anyone have any suggestions on the haplogroup maps at the end of the article. I feel like that they don't add to the article. Before I change it, I was hoping to get some suggestions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.113.91.189 (talk) 04:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]