Jump to content

Gross domestic product

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 12.154.167.137 (talk) at 19:24, 2 August 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For GDP in neuroscience see Giant depolarizing potentials.

In economics, the gross domestic product (GDP) is a measure of the amount of the economic production of a particular territory in financial capital terms during a specific time period. It is one of the measures of national income and output. It is often seen as an indicator of the standard of living in a country, but there are some problems with this view.

Definition

[[iyvhbkhkjknllnlnnlnlnnm lhhhhllliijjjjjjjj testuvg GDP is defined as the total valjkhjkhkjvue of all goods and services produced within that territory during a specified period (or, if not specified, annually, so that "the UK GDP" is the UK's annual product). GDP differs from , gross national product]] (GNP) in excluding inter-country income transfers, in effect attributing to a territory the product generated within it rather than the incomes received in it.

Whereas nominal GDP refers to the total amount of money spent on GDP, real GDP refers to an effort to correct this number for the effects of inflation in order to estimate the sum of the actual quantity of goods and services making up GDP. The former is sometimes called "money GDP," while the latter is termed "constant-price" or "inflation-corrected" GDP -- or "GDP in base-year prices" (where the base year is the reference year of the index used). See real vs. nominal in economics.

A common equation for GDP is:

GDP = consumption + investment + exports - imports

Economists (since Keynes) have preferred to split the general consumption term into two parts; private consumption, and public sector spending. Two advantages of dividing total consumption this way in theoretical macroeconomics are:

  • Private consumption is a central concern of welfare economics. The private investment and trade portions of the economy are ultimately directed (in mainstream economic models) to increases in long-term private consumption.
  • If separated from endogenous private consumption, Government consumption can be treated as exogenous, so that different government spending levels can be considered within a meaningful macroeconomic framework.

Therefore the standard GDP formula is expressed as:

GDP = private consumption + government + investment + net exports
(or simply GDP = C + G + I + NX)

Definition of the components of GDP

The breakdown of GDP into the variables C, I, G, and NX helps economists define each part more exactly:

  • C is private consumption (or Consumer expenditures) in the economy. This is sometimes clarified as: consumer expenditures on final goods and services. All the variables in the GDP equation measure final goods & services expenditures rather than total expenditures; the distinction removes from total expenditure those items which are primarily assets. For instance, buying a Renoir doesn't boost GDP by $20m. (If it did, buying and selling the same painting repeatedly to a gallery would imply great wealth rather than penury.) Note that the Renoir purchase would effect the GDP figure, but not as a $20m receipt, the auctioneer's fees would appear in GDP under Consumer expenditure, because this is a final service.
  • I is defined as business investments in infrastructure, or any other spending intended to generate a subsequent return through business activities. Examples of investment are: training, R&D, marketing, and recruitment. The word 'investment' here is meant very specifically as non-financial product purchases. Buying financial products is classed as saving in macroeconomics, as opposed to investment (which, in the GDP formula is a form of spending). The distinction is (in theory) clear: if money is converted into goods or services, without a repayment liability it is investment. For example, if you buy a bond or share the ownership of the money has only nominally changed hands, and this transfer payment is excluded from the GDP sum. Although such purchases would be called investments in normal speech, from the total-economy point of view, this is simply swapping of deeds, and not part of the real economy or the GDP formula.
  • G is the sum of all government expenditures. The ratio of this to GDP as a whole is critical in the theory of crowding out, and the Keynesian cross.
  • NX are "net exports" in the economy (gross exports - gross imports). GDP captures the amount a country produces, including goods and services produced for overseas consumption, therefore exports are added. Imports are subtracted since imported goods will be included in the terms G, I, or C, and must be deducted to avoid counting foreign supply as domestic. This is the concept of Gross value added.

It is important to understand the meaning of each variable precisely in order to:

Examples of GDP component variables

Examples of C, I, G, & NX: If you spend money to renovate your hotel so that occupancy rates increase, that is private investment, but if you buy shares in a consortium to do the same thing it is saving. The former is included when measuring GDP (in I), the latter is not.

If the hotel is your private home your renovation spending would be measured as Consumption, but if a government agency is converting the hotel into an office for civil servants the renovation spending would be measured as part of public sector spending (G).

If the renovation involves the purchase of a chandelier from abroad, that spending would also be counted as an increase in imports, so that NX drops and the total GDP is unaffected by the purchase. (This highlights the fact that GDP is intended to measure domestic production rather than total consumption or spending. Spending is really a convenient means of estimating production.)

If you are paid to manufacture the chandelier to hang in a foreign hotel the situation would be reversed, and the payment you receive would be counted in NX (positively, as an export). Again, we see that GDP is attempting to measure production through the leans of expenditure; if the chandelier you produced had been bought domestically it would have been included in the GDP figures (in C or I) when the spending receipts of the purchaser was sampled, but because it was exported it is necessary to 'correct' the amount consumed domestically to give the amount produced domestically. (As in Gross Domestic Product.).

Difference from Aggregate expenditure

A measure of the economy to GDP is the Aggregate expenditure measure, which is identical to GDP except that it excludes items produced but not purchased (net inventory/stock level growth). If the economy produces more goods than are sold, the increase in inventory would generally be included in the GDP figure (as "Investment"). This fits into the GDP model by classing the inventory change as "unplanned investment" which will show a return in subsequent years. Technically, GDP is defined as total production quantity multiplied by observed fixed prices for all goods. Where supply exceeds demand it is possible to calculate the 'value' of the additional supply in this way without necessarily explaining why the market has not cleared.

Calculation

United States

The GDP is calculated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

Interest rates

Net interest expense is a transfer payment in all sectors except the financial sector. Net interest expenses in the financial sector is seen as production and value added and is added to GDP.

Cross-border comparison

GDPs of different countries may be compared by converting their value in national currency according to either

The relative ranking of countries may differ dramatically between the two approaches.

  • The current exchange rate method converts the value of goods and services using global currency exchange rates. This can offer better indications of a country's international purchasing power and relative economic strength. For instance, if 10% of GDP is being spent on buying hi-tech foreign arms, the number of weapons purchased is entirely governed by current exchange rates, since arms are a traded product bought on the international market (there is no meaningful 'local' price distinct from the international price for high technology goods).
  • The purchasing power parity method accounts for the relative effective domestic purchasing power of the average producer or consumer within an economy. This can be a better indicator of the living standards of less-developed countries because it compensates for the weakness of local currencies in world markets. The PPP method of GDP conversion is most relevant to non-trade goods' and services.

There is a clear pattern of the purchasing power parity method decreasing the disparity in GDP between high and low income (GDP) countries, as compared to the current exchange rate method. This finding is called the Penn effect.

For more information see measures of national income.

Problems

Although GDP is widely used by economists, its value as an indicator has also been the subject of controversy. Criticisms of GDP include:

  • Very often different calculations of the GDP are confused among each other. For cross-border comparisons one should especially regard whether it is calculated by purchasing power parity method or current exchange rate method.
  • GDP doesn't take into account the black economy, where the money isn't registered, and the non-monetary economy, where no money comes into play at all, resulting in inaccurate or abnormally low GDP figures. For example, in countries with major business transactions occurring informally, portions of local economy are not easily registered. Also, bartering may be more prominent than the use of money, even extending to services (I helped you build your house ten years ago, so now you help me). In Cuba this even goes so far that everyone owns the house they live in, but people are only allowed to swap houses, not sell them.
  • In 'poor' countries, it may just be that everything is cheap, except for a few western goodies. So one may have little money, but if everything is cheap that evens out nicely. Thus, the standard of living may be quite reasonable, it's just that there are, say, fewer TV-sets, meaning people have to share them (which may actually increase the quality of life in a social sense).
  • The quality of life is determined by many other things than physical goods (economic or not). (The best thing in life are free, if they're things at all.)
  • If many products are of low quality in terms of durability then people will have to (unnecessarily) buy them again and again, thus boosting the GDP without increasing their satisfaction. (On the other hand, if products were very durable then that would hamper innovation because people would be less inclined to buy new products, giving producers less of an incentive to develop them.) Similarly, if many products are of low quality in terms of usability and people don't know beforehand which products are the best choice for them, then they will either have to make do with an inferior product or buy again and again until they find something more satisfying. Furthermore, if products have a short lifespan in the market (eg because of fast innovation or fashion) then this process starts all over again when people need a replacement. Note that in a capitalist society these factors working together can easily cause a very high GDP combined with low customer satisfaction.
  • GDP doesn't measure the sustainability of growth. A country may achieve a temporary high GDP by over-exploiting natural resources. Oil rich states can sustain high GDPs without industrializing, but this high level will not be sustainable past the point that the oil runs out.
  • GDP counts work that produces no net change. For example, if a factory pollutes a river, that boosts GDP, and when the taxpayers pay to have it cleaned up, that boosts GDP again. See parable of the broken window.
  • Negative externalities aren't subtracted from the GDP figure.
  • As a measure of actual sale prices, GDP does not capture the economic surplus between the price paid and subjective value received.
  • the annual grow of GDP is corrected by using the "GDP deflator", which tends to under-estimate the objective differences in the quality of manufactured output over time. (The deflator is explicitly based on subjective experience when measuring such things as the consumer benefit received from computer-power improvements since the early 1980s). Therefore the GDP figure may underestimate the degree to which improving technology and quality-level are increasing the real standard of living.

Some economists have attempted to create a replacement for GDP called the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which attempts to address many of the above criticisms.

United States GDP

To give an example of the components and their size. ([1])

Gross Domestic Product (Billions of dollars)
Period Ending 2004
Gross domestic product 11,733.5
Personal consumption expenditures 8,229.1
Durable goods 993.5
Nondurable goods 2,377.2
Services 4,858.4
Gross private domestic investment 1,926.9
Fixed investment 1,882.5
      Nonresidential 1,220.2
            Structures 278.0
            Equipment and software 942.2
      Residential 662.3
Change in private inventories 44.4
Net exports of goods and services -607.0
Exports 1,174.8
      Goods 820.3
      Services 354.5
Imports 1,781.8
      Goods 1,491.2
      Services 290.5
Government consumption expenditures and gross investment 2,184.4
Federal 810.2
      National defense 548.0
      Nondefense 262.1
State and local 1,374.2

Lists of countries by their GDP

See also

Calculation

Data

Articles

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Gross_domestic_product&oldid=20133340"