User talk:Realkyhick

Thank you for your [polite and mature comment] and the deletion of my page.

christianity has a page the Flying Spaghetti Monster has a page. Jøømesocrasy deserves one too.

Please refrain from being an asshole when replying to this comment.

~ PBmoose.

See previous messages at this archive. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Turfway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Turfway.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Darkfighterman

What are you doing deleting my list of fictional barefoot characters? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkfighterman (talk • contribs) 02:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

It is accurate, in fact, look at Toph's profile right here in Avatar the Last Airbender —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkfighterman (talk • contribs) 02:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I've been researching, and asked other community members to research, and it seems entirely possible that this user is a sockpuppet of User:BorisTheBlade. Just so you're aware of developments -- I'll keep you posted. I am told that this user disappears when revealed as another in a string of sockpuppets and pops up again under a different name, so let's both watch for that -- if a set of edits crops up referring to the barefootedness of, say, Nancy Drew or heaven knows what. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

DarkSun

On the band's official website says that they have worked with many important bands like: Primal Fear, Sinner, Rage, Angra... Also says that their album El Lado Oscuro had a great acceptance by the public and was named one of the best Spanish heavy metal albums of the year, they have releasedn 3 studio albums in 5 or 6 years and they are recordind their 4th one DarkSun Website, They wouldn't lie on their website. If this is not important tell me what is then. I'll put this in the article's entry Rockk3r talk 13:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

re: FICTWARN

Saw your message on User talk:Jerry - the injunction has commonly been interpreted as applying to deletion of lists and navigational templates on the basis of the nonexistence of the articles they link to. I can see how some people might see this as extending to all deletion of such things. —Random832 18:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Crawford Architects

I would like some advice as to how to make the Crawford Architects articles not sound like an advertisement. I am trying to base this article off of similar articles, BNIM and 360 Architects. Some of the references are older newspaper articles which have been posted on Crawford's website, rather than just a link to a project description by Crawford Architects. Please advise. Thank you CAKC (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lir logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lir logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

MoW

"However, a differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities." And what does it change in the neutral way of speaking? Why does admitting being involved changing the whole context or value of a page? If it was no problem before, why now? Sorry for being honest in that point, but you really think 10 page long articles about games with inview just appear by regular fans? And I may ask, do you admins communicate with each other? I got granted the chance to expand this page as soon as I have written the German version of it, thanks for clearing up things in forehead before deleting articles with a complete naive attitude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maulwurfel (talk • contribs) 00:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I see that it is really hard to get into WP by just having a limited amount of time, as said one admin was suggesting to me to write the article in German first than transfer into English since my time is very limited, for that he removed all tags from the entry. I came a long and wanted to expand it with an description of the series and all of their names, since it changed very often..., well there wasn't much to expand anymore and this is very annoying if you tried several times to do what admins or bots suggested and don't even get a change in a normal time to fix the problems, mostly the article is removed or deleted a couple of minutes after editing. I know the problem of such a popular place like Wiki and the many entries, but this doesn't support any newcomers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maulwurfel (talk • contribs) 20:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you a lot, still one question, where is the article left? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maulwurfel (talk • contribs) 21:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks I found it through google, since it was not listed in disambiguation page :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maulwurfel (talk • contribs) 14:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 15 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robin Pemberton, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 11:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for your message.[1].Yes db-bio does not apply there.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 2

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —O bot (t • c) 03:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Harry Lee (USMC)

It's not a copyvio. Text is from DANFS which is in the public domain, the bot probably tagged it because I forgot to add the template to the mainpage. Sorry about that. Gatoclass (talk) 07:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:Don't Feed the Divas

Sorry about that, I didn't realize I couldn't do that in userspace. ;-) ATren (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Ahhh... my mistake - I could've sworn I put it as a subpage of my user page! If you think it's OK in Wikipedia: then I'll leave it there for now. Thanks for your help. ATren (talk) 20:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks again for your assistance. It would have been really embarassing if that stayed too long in mainspace. :-) ATren (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Bahn

When the article was first created, I added a speedy to it, because it made no sense; however, the user is Hungarian (and seems knowledgable enough on the Hungarian wiki). I removed my speedy and replaced it with a couple of tags in order to give that user, and possibly other users that may have knowledge about the subject, an opportunity to improve it. Now I see that you have added another speedy to it; I removed that one, both due to the nature of the article (which really isn't that short, just needs arranging and lots of clearing up) and out of respect for the user. I suggest that if you still think it should be deleted, it should be prod'ed, as opposed to speedied. Thank you :) — NovaDog — (contribs) 00:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Shaggy McDaniel

if you even knew him you wouldnt try to get him deleted. he's a model for quicksilver, DC and brands like that. plus he's starting acting. jeez give him a break... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kat130 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Mindigale

Just a bit of luck on my part. He edited something else that was on my watchlist so I checked to see what else they had been doing. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

HOMEGAIN

I am extremely frustrated... the homegain entry was repeatedly vandalized by actual homegain employees and I am the one being reprimanded by having this page taken down.

Homegain is notable because it was the first online real estate lead generation companies that was strictly web based. it also adds to your real estate wiki. Like the others referenced in this wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zillow http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZipRealty

et al

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Real_estate_companies_of_the_United_States

If you look at the history you will see that I have explained this on numerous occaisions and it is the "admins" of this site that is protecting the ones who should really be banned from editing I would like an explanation as to who & why this article keeps being deleted.Tweedlebugb (talk) 00:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Removed prod from Barney Pell

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Barney Pell, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! -- Atama^chat 21:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Myschievia

All right already....We'll fix the damn entry. Geez, you guys have standards?? You actually want a better quality product?? Fine.....just because we love Wikipedia, we'll look at the templates and turn Myschievia into an encyclopedic entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoTexas (talk • contribs) 18:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Rob Phillips

Thanks for your comments. I have added a short note on why I think the subject is important in the talk section of article. I know the subject is a local politician but I think that does warrant an entry in the encylopaedia. Lyndafis (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Barney Pell

I have no problem moving the Barney Pell info to a Powerset article, I think that's a great idea and consensus does seem to support that idea. -- Atama^chat 23:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thomas R. Carter

I felt he was notable, but after research, couldn't find enough individual notability, so I merged with Thelonious Monk Institute of Jazz. Thought you'd like to know. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Spire Research

Hi, pls let me know why the page deserves to be deleted or what I can do to amend it. I have checked the contents for all other research and consulting firms (ACNielsen, McKinsey, Frost & Sullivan, etc) listed in Wiki and written it accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spirernc (talk • contribs) 02:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Would it make a difference if I add public sources? Spire has been quoted and the MD interviewed in several media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spirernc (talk • contribs) 04:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Leigh Lezark

Hello. You tagged this article for speedy deletion under A1 — no context. There was clearly enough context to identify the subject of the article; there was even a link to the band she was in. Please be more careful when tagging, especially with A1. Thank you. seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The A1 criterion states: Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. There was clearly enough context. The subject was a member of a band that even had an article. A7 might have applied, but there was enough context to identify the subject of the article, which is what A1 states. seresin | wasn't he just...? 14:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Speedy deletion of Lamia (Stardust)

Thank you for informing me, I have addressed the matter. Feel free to bask in my glow, who knows, you might get a tan! 27 February 2008 19:12 —Preceding comment was added at 19:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:JitneyJungle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JitneyJungle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. WebHamster 17:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations!!

You've made my quote page, which is definitely one of the most coveted quote pages around. A discussion post that you've made recently made me laugh hysterically in its unusual level of wittiness, dryness, sarcasm, illustration, delivery, timing, and/or good ol' fashion lightheartedness. Thanks for brightening up the place! You can view your quote, in all its glory, preserved for history, at the bottom of this page. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw the "others" comments. Which is why your comment was completely apropo and quite hilarious. I, of course, won't be closing that particular AfD discussion, but in the end, I'm sure it will work out the right way. That being said, have you, Realkyhick, ever considered a run at adminship?. It can be a brutal experience, but if you were successful, you might earn a couple extra buttons that you may find useful. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I understand exactly what you mean by work/wiki balance, seeing how Wikipeida absolutely refuses to pay my mortgage. Let me know if/when you think you could make use of the extra tools, I'd be happy to nom/co-nom you! Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Makeoutclub

Hello,

Could you please explain your comment regarding the Makeoutclub wiki serving as a promotional vehicle? The Wiki entry for "MOC" was created within the Wikipedia guidelines in September of 2007 and removed from speedy deletion contention by Wiki admins. Each claim and remark within the article was provided a citation.

There are entries for several different "social networking" sites on Wikipedia (Myspace / Friendster / Facebook) and Makeoutclub predated each of those three (and a large majority of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites these).

There is no hidden agenda here other than to allow Makeoutclub to be alongside the others it helped inspire and to mark its influence on web 2.0 social networking and the counter culture niche that still belong to the site.

Also, if you check the history of the MOC Wiki entry, you'll be able to see who wrote it.

PowerSet

I put aside time today to finally start the PowerSet article, and redirect the Barney Pell article, and lo and behold not only do I find that the article exists but I think it is much better than something I could have attempted. That was excellent work on your part, I'll content myself with trying to add something here and there but I just wanted to thank you for putting forth the effort to get the article made. -- Atama^chat 17:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

WHY

My article is to show how to speak a new and cool language like pig Latin. it was unoffensive and made perfect sense i barely had it on for a few and u deleted it. I would like to know why —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lxkvc (talk • contribs) 19:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Dick Prall

I think this is too borderline for CSD, so I've removed the tag. Perhaps an AfD discussion would be better. Natalie (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree that he's probably not notable, I just think there was enough claim of notability to rule out speedy. Natalie (talk) 20:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Powerset

Hi Realkyhick,

please note that "powerset" is one of the standard spellings for the mathematical concept. Since there are lots of set theory articles on WP, most links will be to the mathematical concept. --Trovatore (talk) 21:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Century international

Hi Realkyhick, We would like to provide our aim for natural products to people. There are other companies who do so like IBM, Oce etc. They are not deleted, why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorisingh (talk • contribs) 14:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

SciLands

Hey Realkyhick, Glad you had second thoughts about our entry. I'll be the first to agree that it needs a tremendous amount of work. Do you have any suggestions? I'll admit I'm new at this. Hackshaven (talk) 15:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

subst:nn-warn|Women's Action Network for Development

A tag has been placed on Women's Action Network for Development requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ngo-wand (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Women's Action Network for Development (WAND) is a Philippine non-profit, non-government organization that is dedicated to women's leadership and empowerment through different approaches. Thier main objective is to raise and public awareness on women’s issues and structural roots of gender inequality and their intersection with other forms of oppression.

User: Jonttu

User:Jonttu has insisted on debating the AfD of Pipeline Radio via private e-mail. I told him that all discussion about Wikipedia articles should take place on user talk pages and AfD discussion pages, where they may be viewed and commented upon by the entire community. He has blatantly refused to do so, so I am now posting the content of our e-mail messages here so that he will no longer evade this principle. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

(message thread begins here, in reverse chronological order)

It is quite apparent that you have no clue as to the mission or rules of Wikipedia. It is an encyclopedia, based on verifiable facts and sources, about subjects that are notable. Your station is not, or at least you have not provided reliable, verifiable sources showing why it is. We have standards for notability at Wikipedia, and Pipeline Radio did not meet them. Just because your station exists does not grant it the automatic right to have an article on Wikipedia.

Moreover, the fact that you were basically writing about a subject with which you have material involvement is also a violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. That policy is based on the principle that those who are not involved with a subject are best suited to present a clear-eyed, neutral view of the notability of a subject.

You are free to create your own website and post whatever you wish, whether it is true or not. Have fun.

---

Original Message ----

From: James A Riise <jamesriise@soundsnordic.com> To: Robert Carter <address redacted> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2008 7:14:32 PM Subject: Re: Wikipedia e-mail reply

Robert,

Nice to see how you hide behind your computer maybe we should raise this on air on Monday, I am trying to put a case over and nobody seems to listen. Well because of this we have put up a page on the internet, which is a complete copy of the Pipeline Radio Page.

I hope you understand that this station made radio history, its like trying to wipe something that is a damn fact out of history.

I hope you understand my concern, as as for me not being a pro presenter this is the biggest load of crap this side of England. I have presented for the BBC, NRK, and many other big companys.

I hope now your understand why I am puzzled.

Yours

James Riise

Managing Director

Sounds Nordic Ltd

&

Operations Manager

Swift Rail Ltd.

From: Robert Carter

Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 8:02 PM

To: Jonttu

Subject: Re: Wikipedia e-mail

This discussion should not be handled by private e-mail. All discussions regarding Wikipedia articles should take place out in the open on user talk pages, per Wikipedia policy.

---

Original Message ----

From: Jonttu <jamesriise@soundsnordic.com> To: Realkyhick <address redacted> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2008 10:04:27 AM Subject: Wikipedia e-mail

Nice to know your going to delete the Pipeline Radio page, I sent an email to Wikipedia and told them why it is noteable.

The fact is this and if your from outside south london you wont know, Pipeline has gone onto broadcast all over europe just google it.

I would like you to help stop Pipeline Radio page from getting deleted, please help us as many people wish to know the history.

Please help

James

(thread ends here)

Deletion review

See Wikipedia:Deletion review second paragraph, which says, "This includes appeals to restore deleted pages and appeals to delete pages kept after a prior discussion". I think it has always been like that. On the other point of relisting, Wikipedia:Deletion process states "If not enough discussion happened to determine a consensus or lack thereof add (the relist tag)". It is normally used when only 2 or 3 comments have been added. If there are a lot of comments and still no consensus, there is little point in relisting as it just adds to the lack of consensus. --Bduke (talk) 08:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Cream skimming

I am curious as to why you put back the "lack of verifiable references" tag on this article, in view of the fact I've found 3 relevant ones to the two conditions I mention, telecommunications and the postal service, and that one of the references is on the website of The World Bank and the other is on the website of the Postal Rate Commission, whom I think are good reliable third-party sources. I'm just curious as to why you seem to discount them, and I'd like to understand better. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, the thing is, I can go back maybe ten years to the Usenet News Group comp.dcom.telecom where someone did a parody of Don McLean's "American Pie" about "The Day the Bell System Died" about how some competitors "wanted to skim long-distance creams."

I was trying to document the idea, which is why I put in the comment that it is debatable whether cream skimming actually occurs as often as it is feared. My point in giving the examples from telecommunications was to show that despite the fears of that occurring, it never happened; the market was big enough for everybody to get a piece of the pie, and in general long-distance costs dropped dramatically.

I may not have been as neutral as I should have been; I personally think the idea is overblown in most cases. However, the concept is well known and we do not have it defined here so I felt the article was long overdue. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Page Tabs

I'm glad you like the tabs on my page. I wish I had thought of them, I borrowed them from a help article and made some changes to make them generic so they could be used anywhere needed. The global macro that sets them up is called PageTabs, and you can see the instructions from them here. If you're interested in using them, here's how:

• Create a tabs page; this becomes the tabs themselves. The reason for doing this is that if you add or change the tabs, they are consistent on all the pages to which they are used.
• Create the tabs page like this (this is how it will look; don't use a <nowiki> on the actual page. See the source for my User_talk:Rfc1394/tabs page for how it's done.

{{PageTabs
 |[[User:Realkyhick|My page]]  
 |[[User_talk:Realkyhick|Main Talk Page]]
 |[[User_talk:Realkyhick/3|2007]]
 |[[User_talk:Realkyhick/2|2006]]
 |[[User_talk:Realkyhick/1|2005]]
 |This={{{This|1}}}}}

Save that page, calling it, say "User_talk:Realkyhick/tabs"

• Include the tabs page as a macro on each page you're going to use it, near the top of the page, in the form something like {{User_talk:Realkyhick/tabs|This=1}} but on each page you use it, you change "This=" to the number of the page you're using it on, e.g. for the example above, the main page would be 1, your talk page would be 2, your 2007 page would be 3, etc.

Write back if you have questions. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

---

I wanted to mention, thanks for asking about the tabs. Based on your question, I decided to update the documentation for the PageTabs macro, giving an example, primarily based on what I put here on your user talk page, so that other people could figure out how to use it, not merely the ones willing to ask me. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 19:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

---

Newfoundpool If Newfoundpool is an area of Leicester U.K. and the article on Newfoundpool meets Wikipedia standards, then why is adding a link to the article regarded as vandalism?(User:Ning-ning)O.K. thanks! That's cleared it up- will take care not to incriminate myself again ;)(User:Ning-ning) (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

---

Footprints Recruiting

You deleted an entry I made for Footprints Recruiting on Feb. 19, 2008 that was not very good. I completely revised the entry and put it on my Sandbox page - I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Teneriff/Sandbox

I paid particular attention to your comment about notability. Footprints Recruiting is notable for three reasons:

It is the largest ESL recruiter in the world - i.e. is a major component of ESL teaching industry, which is a multi-billion dollar business.

It is the first recruiting company to voluntarily implement screening of both schools and applicants (including criminal records).

It offers a free comprehensive, professional library of teaching aids, plans etc. – available to all. This is unique level of support for a teacher recruiting company and is not restricted to Footprints Recruting customers.

Thanks for your help. I look forward to hearing from you.

teneriff (talk) 01:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I read the conflict of interest link carefully and there is none.

teneriff (talk) 00:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Western Hills Mall

I have nominated Western Hills Mall, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Hills Mall (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —О бот (т • ц) 21:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Response to 2008 SEC Tournament

The article just talks about the rivalry and does not even denotes if Georgia Tech is Georgia's most hated rival. I actually only had a problem with the term "most" in the section because there is no sources (even in the article) that claims that. Reorion (talk) 19:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Mosley Guitars

You have had some input to correct and object to the content for Mosley Guitars, Grayson Guitars and GraysonDNA so I wanted to contact you.

The information in the Mosley Guitar Wikipedia entry is riddled with untrue statements. The company was not founded in the 60's and never produced guitars in the 60's. They have made up a history to attempt to sell guitars based on fraud. They put in all of their listings connections to websites and people that have no connection with the company. They have paid the main writer to produce untrue, inaccurate material.

They should be removed from Wikipedia immediately.Creativepart (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk:J00mes

Thanks for your contribution to the above article's talk page. I'm hesitant to nominate this for deletion (as the article's now gone), just due to the pure brilliance in that one sentence! Booglamay (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

High-Nine Clothing Co.

I typed up that page about my own company, why did it get deleted? I want it up! how do I get it posted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenman999 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Western Hills Mall

Did you forget about the merger again? Just curious. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

What the...

I mean, you might want to delete it but you don need to be a dick about it. Seriously if you hate it so much why do you just not comment. Yes my page was bad but i didnt even know about it till yesterday when my brother told me. He went on and created it because he thought whiteboard was good.

Reference with : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Whiteboard_Program —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turnerj (talk • contribs) 10:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Junction Solutions

Ah - glad you saw that. I was going to drop you a line. Cheers, MCB (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Why, thank you, sir! --MCB (talk) 07:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Two-a-days article

My addition to the Two-A-Days article was perfectly legitimate as noting a criticism. Many people did criticize the team on the point of even having a chaplain in a public school activity.