User talk:Glitzy queen00

XRII

I think you've gone off topic on your rewrite of this page. An x-ray image intensifier is simply a component of a C-arm (converts and amplifies the x-ray signal into light) and not the actual system. With the improvement of flat-panels detectors, there have been a lot of flat-panel based C-arms introduced (vs XRII-based ones). A lot of the description and applications mentioned are modality-based and not really part of the discussion of XRII. (e.g. fluoroscopy and angiography, which aren't exclusive to XRII-based systems) You'll probably want to make a separate C-arm article and move most of the information you added to XRII into it. --Fuzzball! ^(talk) 14:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update on X-ray image intensifier Fuzzball! ^(talk) 13:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again. Fuzzball! ^(talk) 13:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CTA

Good work on CTA page. Keep it up. Keep sharing your knoledge for it multiplies when you share it. Abushahin 18:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CTPA

I hope you don't mind I've moved your nice CTPA page to CT pulmonary angiogram. It presently is rather low on sources. Could you provide some? We need to discuss the technique and also its evidence base (e.g. the ANTELOPE study).

Good to have a radiographer on board! There's a lot of stuff to be done in medical imaging. JFW | T@lk 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I don't mind you moving the article. Thank you for letting me know. Almost all the information on the article is from first hand experience and personal knowledge, but I'll try and get some references on there. If you have any information on trials please feel free to add that but I'd like to keep the information on the scanning techniques as it is. And as a radiographer I know a lot more about scannning than a lot of doctors so I'm happy to add as much as I can. Heather 15:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Glitzy_queen00

Image tagging for Image:Ring artifact.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ring artifact.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ap_lateral_elbow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ap_lateral_elbow.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Axial_appendicular_skeleton.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Axial_appendicular_skeleton.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Barium_swallow.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Barium_swallow.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where have you gone?

Your radiography work is very much appreciated. I hope you'll be back sometime! JFW | T@lk 22:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image request

Hi,

do you have any images for the osteoporosis article? It's our current WP:MCOTW, and the only free image I found was from a DEXA machine, and it's an ugly photograph.

cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 22:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your note on Talk:Osteoporosis, we could use images of a vertebral fracture and possibly a #NOF. I'm sure you see those occasionally :-). JFW | T@lk 09:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - barnstarification

For your contributions to imaging-related articles, especially providing original radiography images. Thank you! JFW / t@lk 17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have filled a void with your great images of osteoporosis and ankylosing spondylitis! Here is a barnstar. Enjoy it. JFW | T@lk 17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with pelvic / hip images

I've split up a hip dysplasia (human) page from the hip dysplasia article focused on the canine condition. It's not all polished yet. I have no trouble finding text, but I don't dare copy out the images because of the copyrights. But without there is a lot of stuff that doesn't work. I found an x-ray of a healthy hip, but it's not the right direction for most of the lines. The following would be highly appreciated: Anterposterior pelvic image showing the "teardrop" (if you could spare a line and point it out I'd be grateful) Subluxated hips or hip joints with dysplasia An image of a hip where the Shenton's line can be drawn in

Any other images you have that might be useful will be most welcome. I copied out image 1 from another language, but find it rather confusing than clarifying.

Before you have a fit looking at the article I should tell you that the references are not all in yet and some of the text still needs some editing. I'm currently trying to find references that will meet the wiki standards as far as I can find out. Sorry for bothering you but there doesn't seem to be an orthopedic specialist on the medicine panel. Lisa4edit