Jump to content

Talk:The Devil and Daniel Webster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cuchullain (talk | contribs) at 22:36, 8 April 2008 (moved Talk:The Devil and Daniel Webster (short story) to Talk:The Devil and Daniel Webster: This is the earliest and primary use.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNovels: Short story / Fantasy Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Short story task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Fantasy task force.
Note icon
This article has an infobox template in need of a Cover! (prefer 1st edition)

what was the goat's name

There was a ram named Goliath that Daniel was wrestling with. --Captwheeler 03:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Folk legend?

In a travel map I picked up, sponsored by ENCO in 1960, it describes Daniel Webster on a level of folklore similar to Paul Bunyan or Pecos Bill. According to the map "When Daniel Webster spoke, some say, the stars flashed and the earth trembled. He had a brow like a mountain and black eyes that burned like live coals." Kevingarcia 07:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Webster was a real person, who was portrayed in melodramatic ways. --Captwheeler 19:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I was just pointing out that his deeds became folk legends, told and retold by people - thanks largely to the book. -Kevingarcia

Other reference

There was also a reference to this story in an episode of Italic textFuturamaItalic text, another show by Italic textSimpsonsItalic text creator Matt Groening in which the main character, Flick, makes a deal with the devil for his soul. They attempt to time travel to retrieve Daniel Webster to help Flick get out of his contract, but inadvertently tagert the wrong Webster, and instead they retrieve the Webster African-American child star of 1980's TV fame.

-"Flick"? Kevingarcia 07:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

  • In several non-English speaking countries, the story is included in textbooks for teaching English to students who are often baffled by the references to events of 19th century American history[citation needed].
Right; we're all stupid. That must be it. 72.144.68.156 01:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Walker?

It's rather stunning that this article contains no reference to the American antecedent of this story. The Devil and Tom Walker is, you know, important. 72.144.68.156 01:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I agree 200%. I did a whole semester on English literature this year and learned all about Faust, and The Devil and Tom Walker, and our teacher told us of it's influence. In short, I've included the details on its influence on this story, that was so ignorantly left out before, in a seeming attempt to make this story the "original version", when 'Tom Walker' was published more than 100 years before. 209.244.42.97 20:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Brief reference to "The Devil and Tom Walker" is what should be on this page. For more details on that story (such as where is was published), the reader should access the article on "The Devil and Tom Walker." Shsilver 03:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film Title

The film was original called All That Money Can Buy and was later retitled the same as the story. Was there some contractual issue behind this? --kosboot 22:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis

Am I the only one who thinks it borders on Original Research? 68.39.174.238 04:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]