User talk:Dark3345

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to KCNC-TV, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: KCNC-TV was changed by Dark3345 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-10T17:05:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RxS (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Users who blank WP:AIV (and not by accident) are presumed to know that what they're doing is blockable. --barneca (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--barneca (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barneca, You should not be adminstrator of Wikipedia you are a bad adminstrator Iam going to see that you lose your position as wikipedia Adminstrator. I don't know what the hell you were talking about but you are a very bad adminstrator.--Dark3345 (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You do need to go see a counsler Barneca--Dark3345 (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~David/Sammy? Is that really you? What a truly amazing, karmic, hilarious coincidence! --barneca (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)~~ I'm sorry, this is taunting. This is the one thing I've done in my interactions with you the last 2 days I regret, and I apologize. --barneca (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a problem with {{User talk:Barneca and as you can see I feel like I have been harassed by him and I have some other friends who is also a Editor on wikipedia thats having the same problem and I was just wondering is there somebody I can talk to about Barneca because I feel he is being rude and being unfair with his blocks.--Dark3345 (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can use {{unblock|your reason here}} to request an unblock, if that is successful you may post on WP:ANI to complain about the actions of an administrator if you feel you have been treated unfairly. GDonato (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dark3345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all Iam sorry for what happened and secondly I would like the block to be lifted because I have some concerns about an Adminstrator that I want to talk about onWP:ANI Thanks

Decline reason:

Per WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#I want to compile a list of unfair blocks by User:Barneca. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Information for reviewing admin

Please see: [1] for more information that i think is applicable. I can't prove it, but I very strongly suspect it. Note that the fact that it was me that blocked him is a coincidence; there was no way for me to know it was the same editor. if I had known, I would have avoided the drama and let someone else do it. --barneca (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflicted, even. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am the editor you had conflict with earlier - This individual is a different user.

Strangely though (or not depending on your point of view), he/she seems to share my view that barneca is an unfair admin. As I say, if you find any link between me and this user then I will do anything you want of me, I will donate all my money to WP if you want, and I will sign a legal declaration if you want. 79.77.136.72 (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Give it up mate you are soooooooooooooooo this user and all the others, everyone is just laughing at you now I'm afraid. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 18:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All I can say is whoever that IP Address is Iam not him--Dark3345 (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So lame! Theresa Knott | The otter sank 18:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People do me a favor just Knock it off Iam not that IP adress Iam not Tina Turner Iam not Cher Iam not Pat Sajak Iam not Bart Simpson And Lastly Iam not related in any shape or form to that IP Address so please stop Thank you--Dark3345 (talk) 19:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This should be enlightening. Dark3345 just triggered an autoblock of his IP: [2]. Anyone want to bet that the next time the IP editor posts, his IP (which has been constant for a while now) is going to change? I'll apologize if he posts from that IP again after this. --barneca (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok im not a tech geek in anyway at all. that guy dark3345 cant post any more? but i can... does it prove im inocent yet?