User talk:Dark3345

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to KCNC-TV, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: KCNC-TV was changed by Dark3345 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-10T17:05:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RxS (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Users who blank WP:AIV (and not by accident) are presumed to know that what they're doing is blockable. --barneca (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--barneca (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barneca, You should not be adminstrator of Wikipedia you are a bad adminstrator Iam going to see that you lose your position as wikipedia Adminstrator. I don't know what the hell you were talking about but you are a very bad adminstrator.--Dark3345 (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You do need to go see a counsler Barneca--Dark3345 (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~David/Sammy? Is that really you? What a truly amazing, karmic, hilarious coincidence! --barneca (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)~~ I'm sorry, this is taunting. This is the one thing I've done in my interactions with you the last 2 days I regret, and I apologize. --barneca (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a problem with {{User talk:Barneca and as you can see I feel like I have been harassed by him and I have some other friends who is also a Editor on wikipedia thats having the same problem and I was just wondering is there somebody I can talk to about Barneca because I feel he is being rude and being unfair with his blocks.--Dark3345 (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can use {{unblock|your reason here}} to request an unblock, if that is successful you may post on WP:ANI to complain about the actions of an administrator if you feel you have been treated unfairly. GDonato (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dark3345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all Iam sorry for what happened and secondly I would like the block to be lifted because I have some concerns about an Adminstrator that I want to talk about onWP:ANI Thanks

Decline reason:

Per WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#I want to compile a list of unfair blocks by User:Barneca. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Information for reviewing admin

Please see: [1] for more information that i think is applicable. I can't prove it, but I very strongly suspect it. Note that the fact that it was me that blocked him is a coincidence; there was no way for me to know it was the same editor. if I had known, I would have avoided the drama and let someone else do it. --barneca (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflicted, even. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am the editor you had conflict with earlier - This individual is a different user.

Strangely though (or not depending on your point of view), he/she seems to share my view that barneca is an unfair admin. As I say, if you find any link between me and this user then I will do anything you want of me, I will donate all my money to WP if you want, and I will sign a legal declaration if you want. 79.77.136.72 (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Give it up mate you are soooooooooooooooo this user and all the others, everyone is just laughing at you now I'm afraid. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 18:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All I can say is whoever that IP Address is Iam not him--Dark3345 (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So lame! Theresa Knott | The otter sank 18:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People do me a favor just Knock it off Iam not that IP adress Iam not Tina Turner Iam not Cher Iam not Pat Sajak Iam not Bart Simpson And Lastly Iam not related in any shape or form to that IP Address so please stop Thank you--Dark3345 (talk) 19:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This should be enlightening. Dark3345 just triggered an autoblock of his IP: [2]. Anyone want to bet that the next time the IP editor posts, his IP (which has been constant for a while now) is going to change? I'll apologize if he posts from that IP again after this. --barneca (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok im not a tech geek in anyway at all. that guy dark3345 cant post any more? but i can... does it prove im inocent yet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.215.172 (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Theresa Knott | The otter sank 19:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please put a stop to this Iam not that IP Address and he is not me so please lets act like grown ups we are not in Elementary school anymore--Dark3345 (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again Iam not him--Dark3345 (talk) 19:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser result

Checkuser says they are unrelated: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dark3345. --Tango (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'll be damned. I was wrong, I apologize. Still defend my block, though. Something's just puzzling, though. Why does this account always post immediately after one of the IP's are blocked? --barneca (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that the block on this account ever depended on their being the same person, but I could be mistaken. Interesting to note, all the same. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My block never depended on them being the same person; I didn't suspect that until they responded to the block. My block depended on them vandalizing WP:AIV; if you know about AIV, you by definition know about the consequences of vandalism. --barneca (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The response to your block certainly look extremely fishy. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 20:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I told you, i never lie, but you didn't believe me which was pretty hurtful. I put this down to a hoax, but the question is by who? I think the hoaxer must have been inspired by my previous rants, but they were mainly directed at admin areas so im a little suspicious as to whether this was an admin hoax. Would you be willing to run a check on Barneca and Dark3345? Do you agree to this Barneca? 79.77.133.250 (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice this user says "Elementary School". I wouldn't have said that because i'm from the UK, where we call it PRIMARY SCHOOL. Is barneca a yank? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.133.250 (talk) 20:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll agree, but the Checkuser probably won't agree to do it. BTW, this is my very last response to this IP, and on any thread relating to him (except I'll respond to an WP:RFCU if one is made). This has dragged on long enough, and my responding (which I started out not doing, but that plan started eroding) is probably helping to keep it going. I concede the final word. --barneca (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I need to start up a Diary sor something--Dark3345 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark did you give up the fight already? Barneca is a bad admin, I agree with you on that. If only more would speak out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.248.1 (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:Er I thought you thought he was Barneca? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 05:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't give up it just that I have slowed down on the issue because it was making my head hurt--Dark3345 (talk) 03:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And why are you bothering to check this page hours after an indefblock? Like I said it's all very fishy. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 05:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is fishshy and thus am convinved of admin involvement, if only somebody would run a checkuser on barneca and this dark3345 then it would put my mind at rest. 79.77.135.89 (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whats Fishy? Checkuser has already proved that Iam not related to that IP Address--Dark3345 (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 16:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People get a grip already Iam not related to that IP Address and I did not do anything so please Shut Up already.--Dark3345 (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you are still here? You're indefinitely blocked. You're not requesting to be unblocked. So, what is the point of hanging around? --Tango (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing I the block was blown out of perportion and secondly there is nothing wrong with me being still here. as Garth Brooks once said We Shall Be Free to hang around here.--Dark3345 (talk) 18:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark you are an idiot, you are clearly trying to imitate me, while at the same time denying you are me. I bet whoever this is, they have a real account with this page stored on their watchlist. is there anyway to find out which users have this page on their watch? I bet barneca does, he's a dodgy admin and i dont trust him as far as i can throw him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.249.16 (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iam not trying to Imitate you. And Iam still denying the fact iam you. But its not only Barneca. You shouldn't trust it's all of the Admins. on this site they are only pretending to be nice but they really aren't and this site is not the best site to really contribute to.--Dark3345 (talk) 21:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boy Howdy you won't believe this Barneca just learned a new word Pretected--Dark3345 (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]