Jump to content

Talk:Parker v. Flook

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dyslexicon (talk | contribs) at 21:08, 17 April 2008 (Correction). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconU.S. Supreme Court cases Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Prior history

  • Correction: "These limits are numbers between which a catalytic converter is operating normally."
    • According to book ref: Computer Law: The Law and Regulation of Information Technology 6th ed. Parker v. Flook had nothing to do with catalytic converters. Instead it had to do with catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons, pg 308.

Dyslexicon (talk) 21:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes Section

Should "The section says," be changed to "Section 101 says," since it is worded this way in Gottschalk v. Benson. I don't wish to change it at this time since I have not had the time to verify that this quote comes from section 101. Dyslexicon (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]