Jump to content

User talk:Stwalkerster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by S.p.p.g.c.f.block (talk | contribs) at 18:58, 26 April 2008 (ty: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Stwalkerster/Status

User:Stwalkerster/AutoArchive




Hello

i have an account with wikipedia know. Thanks for the message. Okli dokli, talk 2 ya later —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgt Sharpe (talkcontribs) 21:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello Stwalkerster, I heard you were an admin and I'd like to ask you for rollback. I've been doing a bit of anti-vandal work wit Lupin's anti vandal tool but I keep getting edit conflicts when I save, and I heard this does it automatically, so I won't get them in future. Thanks :-)--Jaeger123 (talk) 18:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't prevent edit conflicts, but tends to be faster, so you won't get them as often, or you'll be making everyone else get edit conflicts. Done. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Welch

I am a bit upset to see you have deleted Tom Welch's page supposedly because he is a "non-notable footballer". This is really in no way a reflection of the truth. Any chance you can put it back again please ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.224.126.8 (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was proposed for deletion for 5 days, you could have contested the deletioin during that period. Feel free to take it to WP:DRV, or if you can provide a good reason as to why the article should be undeleted, just give me a reply here. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 17:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake?

ummm.. I think this was a mistake because you just restored the vandalism I reverted. Just wanted to let you know because huggle seems to be kind of "unbalanced" today and it's been doing weird stuff. Thingg 18:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting vandalism?

Sorry to be such a bother, but I've been trying to report vandalism, and I've looked through loads of pages to find it... <(^__^)> thanks! 05hepburn3 (talk) 19:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You might find some of the advice at WP:CUV useful. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=D how typical... that small box on the side of almsot all the pages I checked... lmao - thanks again!

Thank You

Thank you for blocking this user for two months as he kept redoing the vandalism I reverted. Thank you and well done in your new position as administrator. --FGWQPR (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New pages

Sorry, it's me again... I was just wondering, I'm looking at the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REQUEST, as I'm trying to request for a new page to be added... =S it doesn't fit into any of the categories though, but I've found another page on wikipedia which is on a similar subject... any help? (let me guess... another one of those side links!) <(^__^)> 05hepburn3 (talk) 19:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 05hepburn3 (talkcontribs) 19:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you have a user account, you can create a page yourself. :) Just type the article's title into the search box, and click Go. If the page exists, it will take you to it automatically. If not, it will offer you a link to create the page. You just need to click the link, and start typing. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only problem with doing that is that I'm not sure that I've quite got the skills to start it, and I'm not sure what to start with (it would be my first page, and so on and so forth)... =P —Preceding unsigned comment added by 05hepburn3 (talkcontribs) 19:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion Review for Followers of Set

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Followers of Set. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 08:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cappadocian (World of Darkness). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 08:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism only account

Hi. Regarding this], I was just about to warn the user and then inform the person who posted at AIV that the vandalism was nothing out of the ordinary, and that the user would be warned as usual. However, I see that you have blocked the account as a vandalism only account. I am concerned by this. Almost every vandal vandalises in their first few edits, this doesn't mean that they should be blocked as a vandalism only account and, again, the vandalism here was not even extreme. I would appreciate it if you could review this decision. Thanks TigerShark (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you review this? When you have, can you please contact me, as I would like to discuss the possibility of unblocking this account. TigerShark (talk) 21:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I was a little too mean. I've changed the block to what will be a total of ~24 hours. Stwalkerstertalk ] 21:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WOW! Barnstar! Again! Yay!

The Help Desk Barnstar
For creating bot(s) to go on #wikipedia-en-help, even if their
<9:39>1 user needs help: [[User talk:Microchip08]]
<9:40>1 user needs help: [[User talk:Microchip08]]
<9:41>1 user needs help: [[User talk:Microchip08]]
<9:42>1 user needs help: [[User talk:Microchip08]]
<9:43>1 user needs help: [[User talk:Microchip08]]
gets annoying at times. Microchip 08 18:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]
Thanks! Stwalkerstertalk ] 18:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ty

Thanks for answering my question!--S.p.p.g.c.f.block (talk) 18:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]