User talk:Cronos1

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:31, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rachel Carson

Keep up the good work monitoring Rachel Carson and talking sense to recalcitrant editors. Just wanted to give you some encouragement.--ragesoss 00:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Spring

Hi,

I placed my GA nomination review comments on Silent Spring some time ago, but found no activity. Would you be interested in responding to them?

Regards, AshLin 14:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From your reply I could make out your interest in the article and definitely the new and different view point which you elaborated. However, in GA review, it is expected that comments of the reviewer are tackled or discussed about in a period of 2 to 7 days. If more time is required, the article may be Failed and renominated later on when the comments are dealt with. I wanted to confirm whether you would be able to respond in such a time frame. If yes, fine. If not, then I propose to fail the article so that more time is available for improvement with subsequent renomination later on. Do drop me a line regarding this, thanks in advance. In good faith, AshLin 09:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please read WP:3RR. If you revert more than 3 times in 24 hours you may be reported and blocked.Ultramarine (talk) 22:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please just cite some better source. The Church Committee investigated for example assassinations against Castro. What is the problem with citing this?Ultramarine (talk) 22:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That might be a possibility. However, there is already a statement in the article I feel accomplishes this and is Wiki-appropriate. I am willing to discuss and I am willing to be convinced. You will note that I have already said I think the Ferguson thesis is appropriate in the Guatemala article. Foreign Relations history, especially the cloak & dagger stuff, is tricky business. I can definately see more than one point of view on cause-effect in totality, but the evidence is overwhelming that the CIA put its foot in this one and I have yet to read anything that would indicate that Ellesworth was right, at least as far as Guatemala is concerned.Cronos1 (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]