Talk:Panzerschreck

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panzerschreck article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

translation

I think the translation "tank terrorizer" would be a bit more adequate, because "Panzerschreck" in this context means "Schrecken der Panzer" (terror for the tanks). --89.57.135.151 10:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Good job. Shinobu 14:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The name was an ironic reference to the original meaning of the word Panzerschreck: the panic seizing infantry being confronted with tanks.--MWAK 14:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that's called "tankshock" in English, but I'm not sure. If it is, it would probably be a better translation. And I like the irony. Shinobu 18:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nah its not called a tank shock its tank terror as said above. User Eskater 11 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esskater11 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Actually it depends on the person who hears the word. I personally tend more to "tank shock" as well. And in any case "terror" is a wrong translation as this would be "der Schrecken" (as a noun), not "der Schreck" ... quite a difference in the meaning, although they are of course related. Here a more neutral selection of translations for "der Schreck". Please note, that "terror" isn't even listed as translation - and rightly so! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.220.100.76 (talk) 14:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting myself here, "tank shocker" would be the better translation, while "tank shock" (in the sense of "shock for tanks") would be the more literal translation.

Move

Why was this moved to Tank terror? Panzerschreck by far the more well known name. Oberiko 00:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Panzerschreck is a far better title. Megapixie 07:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

how many made

i would like to no because its on the common ww2 infrantry page and i dnt no if its common at all, and i would like to fix it if its not.(Esskater11 01:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

289,151 Panzerschrecks and 2,218,400 rockets were produced according to: [1] --Sus scrofa 09:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanak you(Esskater11 13:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Category

translation

Move

how many made