Jump to content

Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.196.4.21 (talk) at 09:19, 7 May 2008 (External links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics and computing, the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (or LMA) provides a numerical solution to the problem of minimizing a function, generally nonlinear, over a space of parameters of the function. These minimization problems arise especially in least squares curve fitting and nonlinear programming.

The LMA interpolates between the Gauss-Newton algorithm (GNA) and the method of gradient descent. The LMA is more robust than the GNA, which means that in many cases it finds a solution even if it starts very far off the final minimum. On the other hand, for well-behaved functions and reasonable starting parameters, the LMA tends to be a bit slower than the GNA.

The LMA is a very popular curve-fitting algorithm; most software with generic curve-fitting capabilities provide an implementation of it.

The problem

Its main application is in the least squares curve fitting problem: given a set of empirical data pairs of independent and dependent variables, (xi, yi), optimize the parameters β of the model curve f(x,β) so that the sum of the squares of the deviations

becomes minimal.

The solution

Like other numeric minimization algorithms, the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is an iterative procedure. To start a minimization, the user has to provide an initial guess for the parameter vector β. In many cases, an uninformed standard guess like βT=(1,1,...,1) will work fine; in other cases, the algorithm converges only if the initial guess is already somewhat close to the final solution.

In each iteration step, the parameter vector β is replaced by a new estimate β + δ. To determine δ, the functions f(β + δ) are approximated by their linearizations

where J is the Jacobian of f at β.

At a minimum of the sum of squares , the gradient of with respect to δ is 0. Differentiating the square of the right hand side of the equation above and setting to zero leads to:

which is a set of linear equations which can be solved for δ.

Levenberg's contribution is to replace this equation by a 'damped version'

where I is the identity matrix, giving as the increment δ to the estimated parameter vector β.

The (non-negative) damping factor λ is adjusted at each iteration. If reduction of S is rapid a smaller value can be used bringing the algorithm closer to the GNA, whereas if an iteration gives insufficient reduction in the residual λ can be increased giving a step closer to the gradient descent direction. If either the calculated step length δ, or the reduction of sum of squares reduction from the latest parameter vector β + δ, fall below predefined limits, the iteration is aborted and the last parameter vector β is considered to be the solution.

Levenberg's algorithm has the disadvantage that if the value of damping factor λ is large, inverting JTJ+λ I is not used at all. Marquardt provided the insight that we can scale each component of the gradient according to the curvature so that there is larger movement along the directions where the gradient is smaller. This avoids slow convergence in the direction of small gradient. Therefore, Marquardt replaced the identity matrix I with the diagonal of the Hessian matrix JTJ, resulting the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

.

A similar damping factor appears in Tikhonov regularization, which is used to solve linear ill-posed problems, as well as in ridge regression, an estimation technique in statistics.

Choice of damping parameter

Various more or less heuristic arguments have been put forward for the best choice for the damping parameter λ. Theoretical arguments exist showing why some of these choices guaranteed local convergence of the algorithm; however these choices can make the global convergence of the algorithm suffer from the undesirable properties of steepest-descent, in particular very slow convergence close to the optimum.

The absolute values of any choice depends on how well-scaled the initial problem is. Marquardt recommended starting with a value λ0 and a factor ν>1. Initially setting λ=λ0 and computing the residual sum of squares S(β) after one step from the starting point with the damping factor of λ=λ0 and secondly with λ/ν. If both of these are worse than the initial point then the damping is increased by successive multiplication by ν until a better point is found with a new damping factor of λνk for some k.

If use of the damping factor λ/ν results in a reduction in squared residual then this is taken as the new value of λ (and the new optimum location is taken as that obtained with this damping factor) and the process continues; if using λ/ν resulted in a worse residual, but using λ resulted in a better residual then λ is left unchanged and the new optimum is taken as the value obtained with λ as damping factor.

Example

In this example we try to fit the function using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm implemented in GNU Octave as the leasqr function. The 3 graphs Fig 1,2,3 show progressively better fitting for the parameters a=100, b=102 used in the initial curve. Only when the parameters in Fig 3 are chosen closest to the original,are the curves fitting exactly. This equation is an example of very sensitive initial conditions for the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. One reason for this sensitivity is the existence of multiple minima - the function has minima at parameter value and

Poor Fit Better Fit Best Fit

References

The algorithm was first published by Kenneth Levenberg, while working at the Frankford Army Arsenal. It was rediscovered by Donald Marquardt who worked as a statistician at DuPont and independently by Girard, Wynn and Morrison.

  • Kenneth Levenberg (1944). "A Method for the Solution of Certain Non-Linear Problems in Least Squares". The Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. 2: 164–168. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • A. Girard (1958). Rev. Opt. 37: 225, 397. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • C.G. Wynne (1959). Proc. Phys. Soc. London. 73: 777. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • D.D. Morrison (1960). Jet Propulsion Laboratory Seminar proceedings. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • Donald Marquardt (1963). "An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters". SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 11: 431–441.
  • Philip E. Gill and Walter Murray (1978). "Algorithms for the solution of the nonlinear least-squares problem". SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 15 (5): 977–992. doi:10.1137/0715063. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)

Available implementations: