This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dashiellx(talk | contribs) at 11:05, 12 May 2008(WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:05, 12 May 2008 by Dashiellx(talk | contribs)(WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008)
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
I made a number of minor changes to this page, including 1) clarifying that there is no unified entity known as the "Judge Advocate General's Corps of the United States," only the separate JAG Corps of each service; 2) clarifying that Air Force judge advocates are (technically, at least) line officers; 3) clarifying that judge advocates are not actually "members" of the court but only detailed to it - the members of the panel (non-JAGs) are the members of the court; 4) noting that the one third enlisted rule applies only upon request from an enlisted accused, and applies to special courts as well as general; 5) noting that an accused in a general court as well as a special court may request trial by military judge alone; and 6) noting that judge advocates must be "real" lawyers in addition to their specialized military training. --PubliusFL02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]