User talk:Razorflame

This is Razorflame's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Razorflame.

This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 2 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Template:Archive box collapsible

User:Razorflame/Guestbook Click here to sign my guestbook!

Please report any false positives that you get from me using Huggle (which I'm a newbie at) at User:Razorflame/FP. Thank you!

Status

Hey. I would just like to say thanks for using my Status thing on your page =]. If you ever have anything you want to add to the template then please just ask me =]. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, not a problem! Cheers, Razor flame 14:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Review

I am pretty much a veteran article writer, with over 2000(!) article to my name, 10 DYK?s and 1 (working on 2) Featured articles. Also, could you review me? Editor of the wiki^{review my edits here!} 19:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that makes 2 of us being veteran article writers. I have written over 1,500 articles over on the Simple English Wikipedia. I will review you tomorrow when I have more time to review you. If I don't review you tomorrow, feel free to write me a reminder. Cheers, Razor flame 20:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?

Not quite sure why you did an instant "revert" on my talk page to List of songs with city names in the title. It was a discussion between me and another user that has since been resolved and is no longer relevant to the article. GeoffEighinger (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your good work patrolling Recent Changes and reverting vandalism in the blink of an eye. Keep up the great work. ~A H 1^(TCU) 00:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

That change was very fast. Nice job.

It was what might be called nonconstructive, but gave more information about Than Shwe than the entire article combined. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.205.68.49 (talk) 00:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Cheers, Razor flame Report false positives 01:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the second welcome. I already have an account, I'm just to lazy to log in for the small fixes I've been doing recently. 76.26.190.14 (talk) 03:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC) = -OzoneNerd-[reply]

Not a problem! Cheers, Razor flame Report false positives 03:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Clean Up

Thank you for cleaning up vandalism on my talk page Bit Lordy (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! It is pretty easy for me to do that using Huggle. Let's see, I'll give you a little Huggle myself! *Huggle!* Razor flame Report false positives 22:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

You said you were going to review me and you haven't. I'm an Editor of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 22:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Cheers, Razor flame Report false positives 22:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the Usertalk revert. Porterjoh (talk) 22:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! Razor flame Report false positives 22:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

...for defending my user page in my absence. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 15:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! Cheers, Razor flame Report false positives 15:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rfb participation thanks

Hello, Mike.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. I wanted to especially thank you for your detailed support rationale; I truly appreciate your kind words. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quadruple

You reverted my edit to The Quadruple and called it vandalism, which it wasn't. I explained the reasons for my edit in the summary, if you only have 3 trophies at a time then it certainly isn't a Quadruple, the only possible way you could get an International Quadruple would involve the Olympics. - 88.107.127.107 (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]