Jump to content

User talk:Foofbun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by J.delanoy (talk | contribs) at 23:27, 17 May 2008 (notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In regards to your question, that picture was deleted because it did not have a copyright tag on it. For an image to be used here, of course anyone viewing the image has to know what the copyright status is on it, whether it's Template:PD, Template:Non-free television screenshot, or otherwise. These tags are representation of where we can use said images, so they are vital, and images lacking them are deleted. With the way our image policies are, that's what I have to do. Wizardman 04:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] 

{{help me}}

Thanks for your help and courtesy, Wizardman. So if I add

and upload it again will that be OK? ThanksFoofbun 07:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that'll suffice. Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've noticed that the still in 'Red Nightmare' has been removed. As it is 1) prior to 1978, and 2) the film was initially made for, commissioned by, and shown by the US Government I believe it is exempt from copyright; can it be restored please? Thank youFoofbun 07:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can re-upload it, or ask the admin who deleted it. Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone for your help and courtesy.Foofbun 08:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image removals

If ImageRemovalBot removed an image, it's because somebody deleted it. Without knowing exactly which image was deleted, I can't tell you why. --Carnildo 08:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your prompt reply, your help and courtesy. I'm slowly getting used to thisFoofbun 08:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question on image to Carnildo

{{help me]] Hi Carnildo,

I've a question on the deletion of the image Bondthrillers. jpg from 'The James Bond Theme' article in Wik. My reasons for believing it no longer copyrighted, are 1)pre 1978, 1965 actually 2)the record company is no longer in business 3)there are no stills from any film or any actors appearing in the picture; the characters in the picture are models. I believe the image is attractive and well suits the theme of 'covers'.

Otherwise do you know how I could trace the copyright on a record cover that doesn't feature performing artists from a record company that is now defunct (through conglomerations and take overs)?

Thanks for your help and patienceFoofbun 08:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS That same image of the male model with a gun on the London album cover was also reused on a Cheltenham Orchestra (Wyncote Records) cover of Bond themes, so as Wyncote was an American firm I don't think there would be any copyright as they weren't suedFoofbun 21:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Goddard (adventurer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Goddard (adventurer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of John Goddard (adventurer). --evrik (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tin soldier

Hi, I moved your recent link from the tin soldier page to the toy soldier page instead - it's proper place, since they're plastic... ;-) Greetings, --Janke | Talk 08:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Good thinking, Janke. I think that the plastic comic book flats are the only flat figures most Americans are familiar with. Thanks for letting me knowFoofbun (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of British anti-invasion preparations of World War II (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on British anti-invasion preparations of World War II (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 06:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy deletion of Brad Harris

A tag has been placed on Brad Harris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 06:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

AfD nomination of Brad Harris

I have nominated Brad Harris, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Harris. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. WebHamster 07:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Theater (structure)

Hi. I reverted this, partly because it was a self link and partly because it is such an uncommon word (outside of Australia and New Zealand, that is) that it merits an explanatory sentence of its own. Something along the line of “In Australia and New Zealand [or wherever the term applies] these are a feature of... [perhaps naming communities that have them] where they are known as ‘theatrettes’ ” . You could give a reference from The Australian Oxford Dictionary, ISBN 0195517962. What do you think? --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Belated Welcome + Waltzing Matilda

Firstly I note no -on has welcomed you !?! - so here it is with hopefully some helpful links and tips: Welcome!

Hello, Foofbun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Matilda talk 22:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next ... you wrote at Talk:Waltzing Matilda#Waltzing Matilda and the 1st Marine Division: As a former Marine of the 1st Mar Div and an Australian I challenge the statement that 'Waltzing Matilda' is an official march of the Division. As a participant in many Division parades I have never, ever heard the tune played.

  • I have tagged for a citation. A possible source is http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/WM/ which has been cited elsewhere in the article. Note that this is not an endorsed ANU page but a personal page of a member of staff (These community service pages are a joint offering of the Australian National University (which provides the infrastructure), and Roger Clarke (who provides the content). + Visiting Professor, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology which probably does not make him an academic on this subject).
Clarke states:

I understand that the tune (without the words) is the marching song of the U.S. 1st Marine Division. In 2003, Col Pat Garrett USMC confirmed that it was/is played every morning immediately after The Marines Hymn ('From the Halls of Montezuma . . .') following the raising of the National colo(u)rs at 0800, and at Divisional parades. Further, "The Division was raised at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina in early 1941, and became associated with Waltzing Matilda when the Marines came to Melbourne in early 1943 for rest and refit following the successful retaking of Guadalcanal, and before it returned to combat at Cape Gloucester in New Britain in the Northern Solomons in September of that year"

I would be interested in your response regards Matilda talk 22:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    • The news story on the 65th anniversary sounded reasonably official. Unfortuantely the websites supporting the Marines - ie.mil - were down this morning and I couldn't check any of the links from pages put up by Marines. That would be my preference too for a citation to support the claim. Regards --Matilda talk 06:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piping and templates

Please remember that when the article title includes an identifier, such as Tightrope (TV series), you can and should use the pipe symbol "|" just before the closing "]]" of the link. This will automatically convert the link so that although it still points to "Tightrope (TV series)", it appears to a reader as just "Tightrope". Remember, we want to show the reader the actual name of the show, not the name that Wikipedia picked for the article on that show. (The exceptions, of course, are Wikipedia's disambiguation pages, where we are trying to identify which of multiple Wikipedia articles with similar titles is the one the reader actually wants.)

Also, since you seem to work on many film and TV articles, you will probably want to learn how to use the templates {{imdb title}} and {{imdb name}}. -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 04:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Summer of the Seventeenth Doll

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Summer of the Seventeenth Doll, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. All the best, Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Murderbike (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Chesterfield Pictures

A tag has been placed on Chesterfield Pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J.delanoygabsadds 23:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Foofbun&oldid=213138394"