Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net Authority

dis site be gone yo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Habanero-tan (talk • contribs) 19:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Per WP:NTEMP Notability is not temporary. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 20:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Weak assertations of notability, but they're there. And a trout to the nom as well. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, keep since the nom couldn't provide a rationale for my "So?" If death were a reason to delete, WP wouldn't have an article on goatse, :) nor would we have biographies on dead people. -- Fullstop (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Worst AfD nom I've ever seen, read this before you make any more nominations please. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, no rationale for deletion presented. Nominator does seem to have the capability of valid participation in AFDs per contribs, so I don't know what the explanation is. --Dhartung | Talk 23:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep dis site be notable yo. Upon further thought, this AfD nom looks like a joke. Acro X 00:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. No deletion rationale, subject is reasonably notable. I advise the nominator to familiarise themselves with deletion policy. WilliamH (talk) 08:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. How many times must it be said? Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]