User talk:Gulmammad

Welcome to Gulmammad's talk page!

Please add new messages to the bottom of the page. If a conversation is started here, I'll respond here; if it starts on your talk page, I'll respond there.

Vandalism and insults left here will be recycled in the bit bucket. Remember: be nice!

AfD nomination of A. P. Balachandran

An editor has nominated A. P. Balachandran, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. P. Balachandran and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New article announcements

Hi Gulmammad

Please note that you can announce new Azerbaijan related articles created by you or anyone else here: Portal:Azerbaijan/New article announcements. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, Grandmaster (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo of ans.jpg

Hi. Sorry, I just noticed your message, it was right under the arbcom message so I did not see it immediately. Copyright is a serious problem here, so we need to provide a good substantiation of he copyright status. I'll check to see if the logo can be used here. Grandmaster (talk) 06:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silav

Birayê xweşdivî, Ez pir şa bûm bi dîtina rûpela te li vir. Herwusa, çava min bi gotara ku we nivîsîye (Shamil Askerov) ket. Wesa dîyare kû hûn agahiyên baş û zelal hene derbarê keltûr û çanda kurdî li welatê Azerbaycanê. Heke serçavên te hene li ser wî babetê, tikaye alîkariyê min bide. Pir sipas.Heja Helweda (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me

ROFL, you think I'm ARMENIAN? Wow. Also, please show me where my maps of Kalbajar are incorrect. If you want to "clean up my garbage" and "stop me", by all means, please go to WP:RFC so they may laugh at you as well. --Golbez (talk) 19:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes You

So you are not Armenian ( I am sure you are not either Azerbaijani) but you are very much interested in uploading maps of administrative districts of Azerbaijan in which half of Kalbajar is shown as a part of so-called Nagorno-Karabakh. If you disagree with me, see [1] or see map of Kalbajar before it was occupied by Armenia. Please don't upload maps that you drew according your dreams but refer to the official documents. I call those maps that you uploaded nothing but garbage unless you provide with official sources. If you insist on that those fake maps are correct, you are going to have a trouble as an editor Golbez -- a third party administrator. -Gulmammad (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The map shows the area of Azerbaijan that they claim but do not control, just as maps of China show land they claim but do not own, same with Taiwan. Believe it or not, but Nagorno-Karabakh exists, even if only as a place Armenia occupies. "nothing but garbage" is very nice, have a cookie. Perhaps you should discuss this with the various Azerbaijani editors who for the last few years have had no problem with those maps? Perhaps you would like us to delete our articles on everything Nagorno-Karabakh? Yes, I insist they are correct, I look forward to your hilarious attempts to do... something to me, who knows. --Golbez (talk) 00:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your map had better not show the half of Kalbajar as a part of so-called Nagorno-Karabakh in the article about Kalbajar. You could put it only on the article about Nagorno-Karabakh, a region which is being claimed by separatist Armenians in the region, and not recognized by any country in the world! But you have included that region to all maps of administrative regions of Azerbaijan. There is nothing called Nagorno-Karabakh as an administrative region of Azerbaijan but instead Khojavend, Shusha, Khojali and Tartar. Your maps are not still valid and for now they are garbage, showing the dreams of Armenian ideologists. When Nagorno-Karabakh is recognized by world community, then you will put them in wiki OK? --Gulmammad (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. They've stayed there for years, you won't stop them. If you want to, by the way, please review the Azeri/Armenian arbitration, and I also suggest you communicate more with the other Azeri users. --Golbez (talk) 01:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly require from you to provide those maps with official sources! I also can draw many maps as I wish and upload to wiki, that will be my work but not document! You did what I am telling and up to now no-one has noticed about your fake maps! In Wikipedia I want to see correct information about anything. Let us not fool wiki users with our self-ideologies! --Gulmammad (talk) 02:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to insist you take this directly to WP:RFC, as this will only lead to an edit war. You have to ask the wider community. --Golbez (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar

I just saw the barnstar you gave me — thanks! —David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw the the barnstar too, thanks very much. Regards, Grandmaster (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijani passport

Two changes should be made in relation to the photo of the Azerbaijani passport which is in the Types of passports section: (1) The caption should be changed to "Inside front cover and first page of a non-biometric Azerbaijani passport". That's what's in the photo. (2) The photo, which is near the text about emergency passports, should be moved up, so that it is near the text about ordinary passports, because that's what the photo illustrates. Passportman (3/4/2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.40.137.197 (talk) 05:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Facts about Mohammed El Naschie

Facts about Mohamed El Naschie

This Dear Sir, I'm a wikipedia user (nasr2000) who created the article about prof. El Naschie. Prof. El Naschie asked me to remove the article completely from wikipedia as some people are hacking it continuously. I discovered that , although i'm the creator of the article, it is not allowed for me to remove it!! can you please help me in removing this article as soon as possible as he doesn't want an article about him on wiki which anyone can edit.

Well, as a former student of professor M El Naschie and as a doctorate student in Quantum gravity and related fields in UK, i can say that prof. el naschie is a WELL KNOWN scientist and very respected in his field of research. he is one of the most prominent researchers in his field.

I'm looking forward to hearing from you and thank you in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasr2000 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not insulting you, you told me (impolite) first, didn't you? if you consider this word an isult then why did you tell me it?! you should respect people if you want people to respect you. I don't like to insult anyone and haven't done that at all before. i just told you what you told me just to realize that (impolite means an insult) and you did realize because you got very angry from it exactly like i got when i read it!!

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gulmammad" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.240.229.68 (talk) 15:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M. S. El Naschie

i don't know how wiki administrators lestin to any jealous or malicious person. you should investigate by yourself about what faragali said. all of what he said is completely wring and just some lies. prof. el naschie main contributions are in the field of chaos and fractals so it is more convenient for his papers to be published in Chaos, solitons and fractals. he also has some papers published in other journals. if you want to delete the article delete it immediately without putting this deletion marks which is considered as an insult to Prof. el naschie. insulting famous and respected people like that is punishable by law and Prof. el naschie is going to take a legal actions if you don't stop that. he wants you to delete the article because he is well known without wikipedia, he doesn't need wikipedia to be known. i created the article for him and unfortunately cannot delete it. can you please delete el naschie article which i created? thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasr2000 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I investigated by myself and nominated the article for deletion. Thanks --Gulmammad (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I had just left a comment for you on the talk page of this article. What you say makes a lot of sense and I agree that it doesn't appear the article meets our requirements. I suggested that perhaps you would like to open a deletion discussion. Thanks for the information. Shell ^babelfish 18:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't finish the AfD for M. S. El Naschie, I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I was trying to figure out the third step. It is my first time... --Gulmammad (talk) 03:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M. S. El Naschie, S. El Naschie or M. Naschie

The article which appeared under above names has been deleted see debate page.

Use of Rollback

Please rollback only for reverting vandalism. Please do not use rollback for content disputes as you have done numerous times in Lachin. Please see WP:ROLL for more information. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 03:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've used the rollback tool to revert edits by 83.217.229.146, 91.103.28.248, and 212.73.95.1. I realized that the editor behind these IP addresses is almost professional editor in Wikipedia but doesn't want to appear with a real username. And I believe I've done something correct. However, I found some parts of edit that was done by 91.103.28.248 had believable sources and I've just placed them back to the article Lachin. --Gulmammad (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please defend your use of Rollback here. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I defended my use of the Rollback there. If you need something more, let me know.
--Gulmammad (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gulmammad: Then that needs to be said in a edit summary, which you will now have to do as your rollback has been temporarily removed. Tiptoety ^talk 21:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gulmammad, I am taking Tiptoety's advise to discuss this matter directly with you. Articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan are of a very sensitive nature. Please exercise great care when reverting or making controversial edits. Discuss your controversial edits and reverts in the talk page. It is very important that you always use useful edit summaries and avoid using edit summaries like "are you looking for a place to put armenian related information?)". Most of the editors who edit Armenia-Azerbaijan articles confine themselves or are confined to one revert per week per article. If you find that someone reverts you, discuss the matter in the talk page rather than reverting back. I hope this helps. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had so much info about Armenian-Azerbaijan related articles since I haven't participated in any of WP:ARBAA as you might have had. I wander why you defend so much edits those were made by unknown IP's? Why you haven't warned (as I am going to do) any of them for removing sourced information from the article many times such as this by 212.73.95.1, which after my revert was repeated here by 83.217.229.146. Instead you have been trying very hard to take my right of using the rollback tool and to put me under supervised editing for reverting them using the rollback. Is this action of you constructive?
--Gulmammad (talk) 01:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had asked you nicely to stop using rollback and you simply switched to using undo without leaving any comment. That is why I posted about getting you put on supervised editing. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pocopocopocopoco, at this time I do not think that Gulmammad's actions warrant him being placed on supervised editing. Hopefully he has learned his lesson and will be more careful in the future. Tiptoety ^talk 04:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intentions of commenting on the situation. I'm just here to say that if you get the rollback function back, you can put importScript('User:Gracenotes/rollback.js'); into your monobook.js page. Then you can use an edit summary when rolling back edits from a diff. That would prevent this problem from popping up in the future :) --Cheers -The Hybrid- 08:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Cheers :) -The Hybrid- 02:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond here. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for being so late, I saw someone else has already responded. Just to remind you, this is the second time you calumniate me. Seems again it didn't work. --Gulmammad- 13:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Don't worry, you're welcome to copy any elements of my user page. Actually, Master of Puppets did most of the design, which he volunteered to do for me. I'm not that great of a designer, so I really appreciated his help. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Before my page was such boring I wanted even to stop editing:) Gülməmməd ^Talk

Edit warring, notice of discretionary sanctions

As you seem to be engaged in edit warring in an area covered by an arbitration committee case, this is to be your warning that discretionary sanctions, as provided in this case may be applied to you. Specifically, further edit warring may lead to a block from editing, or a temporary ban from editing articles on which edit wars have taken place. Please make sure to use dispute resolution rather than engaging in repeated reverts. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

3RR violation on Nagorno-Karabakh, per a report at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gulmammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In all my edits I gave sufficient explanation for my actions and as it reported here I never reverted the article Nagorno-Karabakh to its previous version but in each case I started with undo and made changes toward the real fact (initial edit wasn't mine) as you can see from here the result of my edit has been confirmed by Golbez(with whom I am supposed to have been edit warring) after it was reverted by unknown IP, see. I request from administrators to go details of this and unblock me. I don't think I have been edit warring instead trying to make clear the fact which initially given. Thank you. Gülməmməd ^Talk 19:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=In all my edits I gave sufficient explanation for my actions and as it reported [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Gulmammad_reported_by_User:Pocopocopocopoco_second_report_unrelated_to_the_first_.28Result:_Discretionary_sanction_notice_.2B_24_hours.29 here] I never reverted the article [[Nagorno-Karabakh]] to its previous version but in each case I started with ''undo'' and  made changes toward the real fact (initial edit wasn't mine) as you can see from [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh&diff=216452947&oldid=216403450 here] the result of my  edit has been confirmed by [[User:Golbez|Golbez]](with whom I am supposed to have been edit warring) after it was reverted by unknown IP, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh&diff=216417950&oldid=216403450 see]. I request from administrators to go details of this and unblock me. I don't think I have been edit warring instead trying to make clear the fact which initially given. Thank you. <b>[[User:Gulmammad|<font color="#009900">Gül</font><font color="#FF0033">məm</font><font color="#0000FF">məd</font>]] [[User talk:Gulmammad|<sup><font color="#999900">Talk</font></sup>]]</b> 19:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=In all my edits I gave sufficient explanation for my actions and as it reported [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Gulmammad_reported_by_User:Pocopocopocopoco_second_report_unrelated_to_the_first_.28Result:_Discretionary_sanction_notice_.2B_24_hours.29 here] I never reverted the article [[Nagorno-Karabakh]] to its previous version but in each case I started with ''undo'' and  made changes toward the real fact (initial edit wasn't mine) as you can see from [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh&diff=216452947&oldid=216403450 here] the result of my  edit has been confirmed by [[User:Golbez|Golbez]](with whom I am supposed to have been edit warring) after it was reverted by unknown IP, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh&diff=216417950&oldid=216403450 see]. I request from administrators to go details of this and unblock me. I don't think I have been edit warring instead trying to make clear the fact which initially given. Thank you. <b>[[User:Gulmammad|<font color="#009900">Gül</font><font color="#FF0033">məm</font><font color="#0000FF">məd</font>]] [[User talk:Gulmammad|<sup><font color="#999900">Talk</font></sup>]]</b> 19:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=In all my edits I gave sufficient explanation for my actions and as it reported [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Gulmammad_reported_by_User:Pocopocopocopoco_second_report_unrelated_to_the_first_.28Result:_Discretionary_sanction_notice_.2B_24_hours.29 here] I never reverted the article [[Nagorno-Karabakh]] to its previous version but in each case I started with ''undo'' and  made changes toward the real fact (initial edit wasn't mine) as you can see from [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh&diff=216452947&oldid=216403450 here] the result of my  edit has been confirmed by [[User:Golbez|Golbez]](with whom I am supposed to have been edit warring) after it was reverted by unknown IP, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh&diff=216417950&oldid=216403450 see]. I request from administrators to go details of this and unblock me. I don't think I have been edit warring instead trying to make clear the fact which initially given. Thank you. <b>[[User:Gulmammad|<font color="#009900">Gül</font><font color="#FF0033">məm</font><font color="#0000FF">məd</font>]] [[User talk:Gulmammad|<sup><font color="#999900">Talk</font></sup>]]</b> 19:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Personally, I would unblock you for edit-warring on Nagorno-Karabakh, since it was just a dispute resolution method I was using, but you were also edit-warring on Sheylanli. --Golbez (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]