Talk:Cambridge Energy Research Associates

Business Stub‑class

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rigor

Let's bump this article up out of stub class. First, we need to support the claims made by WP about CERA. There are many predictions made, and many of them did not pan out.

Second, we need to maintain a good encyclopedic writing style, so "sell his soul" type comments need to be couched in terms that can be verified by other sources. Skyemoor 14:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I'll start the ball rolling. Here's one source (and more pages at the same site); http://www.energybulletin.net/18111.html --Skyemoor 14:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

best wikipedia table ever!

hahaha love it. maybe wrong should be capitalized though.