Jump to content

User talk:Brideshead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.72.34.245 (talk) at 16:29, 15 June 2008 (→Bukkake: Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please click here to leave me a new message.
Please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~); unsigned messages will be removed without reply.

My IP Address: 77.97.229.86

User:AlexNewArtBot

Hi Brideshead, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.

If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :)   This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 22:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 15:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Septarian nodule

Septarian nodule

Hi! I created an about Septarian nodules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septarian_nodule Would you mind looking at it and editing it? thanks! Neptunekh 02:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aegina Harbour.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Aegina Harbour.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Project European Union

Hello Brideshead, you are member of the project European Union. I try to create a new project page for the project. You can see it at here Because this should be the project page for all it´s members, please tell me, what you think about it. Please leave your comments on the talkpage of the project.--Thw1309 11:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Fair use disputed for Image:CareCommissionLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CareCommissionLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 20:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered by SatyrBot around 17:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC) SatyrBot (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bukkake

The purpose of Bukkake is female humiliation. I don't doubt that someone has made a porn movie involving a male as a subject -- and called it bukkake. Their use is the misnomer, not the definition. My concern is the accuracy of the usage. The citation gived the definition. Male humiliation in that fashion may occur, but it would not accurately be called bukkake, because it is not a female subject. Although I personally advocate non-sexism and fair representation of sex acts regardless of the gender of the participants, in this case the act originated in Japan, a highly sexist culture at that time, and some might say still. The primary goal of the act then, and now is humiliation of a female subject. You and I may not think that is fair, but that does not really matter. Some may desire to generalize the definition to focus on the mechanics of the act, rather than socio-cultural origins and redifne it, but that is not for wikipedians to do. 75.72.34.245 (talk) 00:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realise this is only a talk page, however I really hope what is being said here does not make its way onto an article page. I would really love to see reliable citations to back up your claims, I would also love to see you justify the racism towards Japan that are stated above. Sennen goroshi (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brideshead, I am sorry for the confusion, I did realise that the initial message was not made by you, I should have clarified the fact that my comments were directed towards the anon IP editor, not yourself. Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I intend no racism toward Japan. Japan, like the U.K and U.S. has less than favorable historical facts. Also, you should note that my comments are in regard to historical acts against women, not a race. These acts (against women) occur throughout most culture's history. The act called Bukkake has Japanese origins, but I have no doubt that every other culture has a similar history. Why the Japanese act is engraved in history and not the acts of other cultures is beyond me. Perhaps because of the Japanese occupation of China and Korea? Who knows. 75.72.34.245 (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bridesmaid: Quote "The purpose of Bukkake is female humiliation". This is YOUR opinion, NOT fact. bukkake can involve a variety of participants, not simply the narrow definition you ascribe to it. I'm reverting the edit. --Brideshead (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

You are welcome to your opinion of course. But, I was not giving opinion but supporting the citation that was given. As a feminist is is also my perspective, but that isn't really relevant in the article. The act knows as "Gay Bukkake" is a recent phenomena. I am a strong supporter of GLBT/LGBT, and could care less what the genders of the people involved in any given sex act are. I am sure there is a long history of groups of people (male or female) ejecting or "splashing" ther ejaculate upon a single subject/victim for a variety of reasons, including for eroticism or humiliation or punishment -- whatever. The article is about Bukkake though, not about porn films, or "facials" or pearl necklaces or group sex or LGBT. Bukkake is of Japanese word and cultural origin. As I just said, the article is about Bukkake, not sperm ending up on someone elses face. Their probably is a much broader and more diverse history of Bukkake in Japan than I am aware of -- I am no expert on Japanese culture. One may need to be a good student of Japanese culture to really understand that. But, in a limited Wikipedia article, certainly the primary elements are 1) Muliple men ejaculate on their subject. 2) The subject is a woman. One can speculate the motivations of this cultural acts. (history suggests punishment of the woman, and ritual humiliation of the women is part of that, but there may be other contexts) The history does not, as far as I know, describe groups of men ejaculating on other men. (Although Japanese history does describe men urinating on other men as an act of domination/humiliation.) It does not describe describe groups of women ejaculating on men or women. So, when I emphasize that the Bukkake article should stick to the historical references, rather than a fairly recent trend of pornography of various kinds (regardless of the genders involved) it is not mean't to show bias against LGBT but intended to be true to the facts, regardless of what I would prefer. 75.72.34.245 (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brideshead&oldid=219515984"