User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/42

Tip of the moment... Digital audio support Wikipedia uses the Ogg Vorbis, FLAC and WAV formats for audio, as they are not encumbered by patents (an issue that prompted the decision that MP3 files will not be hosted at Wikipedia). Software supporting Vorbis exists for many platforms... Mozilla Firefox 4, Opera 10.5 and Google Chrome 3 (and later versions) each include their own support for Ogg Vorbis files. As for multimedia players, Winamp can be used to play Ogg Vorbis files. Although iTunes does not natively support Vorbis, Xiph.Org provides a QuickTime component which can be used in players that rely on QuickTime, such as iTunes, on both Microsoft Windows and Mac OS. DirectShow filters exist to decode Vorbis in multimedia players like Windows Media Player and others which support DirectShow. Various online tools (such as Zamzar) are available which let you freely convert one file format into another, and can be useful when you want to upload a file to Wikipedia. Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip Read more: Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files#Audio   Become a Wikipedia tipster To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}}

TMZ

Is TMZ a reliable source, this was in the madonna article which is currently on GA reassessment. Personally I think its a little tacky to say the least, they dont have the best rep. Reply at your talk page if you like, im watching. ;-) --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 18:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't give it too much cred, it seems to be just a celeb gossip-mill of the tabloid style. They may not exactly lie, but the may make up the truth, if you see what I mean. I'd look for a better source for a GA nomination. --Rodhullandemu 18:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheers ;-) --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 19:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

But hes insulting you. ;-( --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 21:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Rod, you need to keep an eye on the Beatles article if you want to see it get to FA. Im not going to get into an edit war with uber beatles fans but snopes is not reliable and I dont like being reverted when im trying to keep an article I have zero interest in above water. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Your call if you dont have the time, but Kodster is actualy trying to sort the article out, other editers are blindly getting in the way. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

It wont get through FA, I had snopes removed like 7 times on the MJ article at the last review. Still if it takes a failed FA for them to get that no problem. But failing a FA is a brutal, misreable process trust me. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Its a draining task, Im only going to try and get MJ and "Thriller (album)" to FA and then thats it lol. Im getting stressed about the MJ article, I promised myself id run again soon but im to scared. I dont like my work put under that strong a microscope. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

The Beatles

The lead section for this article is quite inadequate both for an article of its length and in conveying basic facts. It still doesn't even mention that the band broke up. I just had to add the members of the band, which is very essential information. Check out FA lead sections in The Smashing Pumpkins, R.E.M., or Metallica for the sort of information that needs to be covered in the introduction to a band article. I'm of the opinion that that lead could use a drastic overhaul. WesleyDodds (talk) 00:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Maybe so. It took about three days just to reach consensus for "The Beatles were a rock and pop group from Liverpool, England", so it's a difficult process. Now, what't your source for 1960 as the year of formation fo the band? --Rodhullandemu 00:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I went with the one listed in the infobox, because I figured that had been hashed out as a result of consensus. We could always cite Allmusic if need be. WesleyDodds (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I guess they're as reliable a source as any, but with The Beatles, someone will always come along and try to argue the toss. --Rodhullandemu 00:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

WOW, what happened to discussion? --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 02:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, night night, understand completely. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 02:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

The idea is I'm operating under WP:BOLD. The article needs definite cleanup and even some rewriting, so even if some of my changes are undone, hopefully it will start some discussion that will improve the article. Don't worry, I have a degree in English and have written three FA band articles (The Smashing Pumpkins, Joy Division, and R.E.M.), so i have a general sense of what I'm doing. WesleyDodds (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Talking about blocking an editor for attempting to boldly improve an article is wholly against Wikipedia's ideals. We're here to encourage contribution (from one of the finest music editors we have, I might add) to articles, not discourage them. CloudNine (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Maybe so, but I distinctly got the impression that he was attempting to take ownership of the article since he didn't seem to be cooperating with the other editors whom, it has to be said, have already put in a lot of work. Apologies if I misread the situation. --Rodhullandemu 19:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Naming articles with the same name.

Hi

What happens when a football player has the same name as another and the article has the title 'Players Name (footballer)'?

--TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier. Apparently people name the player e.g. David Beckham (footballer born 1975) if they have the same name. That seems a pretty good idea. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 22:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Name change and redirect please.

Hey these two articles are exactly the same, only ones better and has more detail than the other. The "Michael Jacksons Music Videos" article is the same as the "filmography" only it has the extra stuff on MTV and his affect on the Music video at the top. Its much better. The filmography page is inferior. Would it be possible if you could delete the "Filmography" article and change the name of "Michael Jacksons Music Videos" to filmography please. Take a look at the too article you will see what I mean. [1]. Cheers. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 20:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, yeah, ill get around to it in 2011 mate, im overloaded as it is. ;-) --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 20:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

University Challenge userbox

If you're interested, I've created a University Challenge userbox. Visit {{User:UBX/University Challenge}} for instructions on how to use it. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 02:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Its Britney Bitch!

This is SOOO funny. I still love this. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 16:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

JJ wikiproject

I am gay 07-08 style="color:#EF9B0F ">Come Speak To Me]]) 03:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

James Stewart (actor)

Discussion moved to /Harvey_Carter, please make additions there. --Rodhullandemu 22:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: My talk page

Yeah, I will keep my head. I will revert edits of that variety, but I'm not going to go crazy blocking people (I can't I'm not an admin ;) ) or preemptive strike-reporting to AIV. But thanks for letting me know. Thingg^⊕⊗ 17:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

heh. I didn't take it that way at all, but thanks for the reassurance. ;) Thingg^⊕⊗ 17:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

WarAgainstRugs

I see you agreed I was correct in my ID of this account, but I still worry if it was appropriate to revert so quickly (which I screwed up in any case, due to weird edit conflict I guess--he is quick!). Would it be better just to lie low and watch? Is there any good way to alert the admins to keep an eye on a user without alerting him too? I know you are on the case, but everybody gotta sleep sometimes. I was too sleepy to be reliably rational myself last night. Thanks ! Wwheaton (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Law Project

That's great, thanks for the pointers. I am new to writing for Wikipedia and so familiarising myself with the conventions of it. I guess once I have written a page I submit it generally under an article head or do I submit it to anywhere specific if it is concerned with the project?(Willrgby (talk) 22:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC))

Re: The Beatles

Yeah, I did that to start with, and I'll spend a while cleaning it up - I did it pretty quickly, as I find it easier to look at it in context and amend from there...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 23:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#complaint_about_a_ADMINISTRATOR_-.3E_User:R._Baley

I know we'll both go to hell for it, but I couldn't help but laugh at your comments. Corvus cornix_talk 06:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I've had the same feeling for a while. Corvus cornix_talk 15:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 23	2 June 2008	About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Question

This IP address, (my address), is registered to Opal Telecommunications, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

i have no idea wtf u are on about i never even went on that page so piss off —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.113.255 (talk) 15:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Replied on IP talk page. --Rodhullandemu 15:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I see you replied to the user at the same time as I did :). ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 15:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, the joys of edit conflicts! --Rodhullandemu 15:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

That or not knowing that the other editor is going to reply at the same time. I wasn't sure if you were around, saw the comment and so decided to be bold and go for it. I've removed my comment anyway since yours has dealt with the issue at hand. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 15:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Article for deleting

Sony/ATV Music Publishing - could you delete this article please, it repeats everything that is in the Northern Songs article which is a better article and well sourced. It should be redirected to Northern Songs really. If you can do it please also take the Wikiproject banners off the talk page. Cheers. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 18:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, will do. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 18:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Blade Runner

I understand. I still regard it as an obscure and needless addition to the opening paragraph, but I will of course abide by the collective decision.Normalmouth (talk) 19:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

User:91.104.156.54 is DY71 sock

I am almost sure. An unnoticed edit of ACC from 27 March is the tipoff, together with list of contributions. Another IP editor with the same modus operandi is active now, User:85.73.240.56. I have reverted both cases, but keep an eye out and block him when you are convinced. Wwheaton (talk) 06:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Also 78.109.28.16, I think, still active. Wwheaton (talk) 06:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think so. I just tagged three or four IP accounts as suspected socks. Keep on truckin' Wwheaton (talk) 03:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Silver editor service award

Because of your many edits you have a Silver editor star.

Greetings! Demophon (talk) 08:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Dear Rodhullandemu,

My well-meant excuse! You 'don't' have the right to the Silver editor star. You're right, only after more than 16,000 edits and 3 years' service you're entitled to the Silver editor star. Sorry!! How did you get so many edits in such a short time? Demophon (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Insomnia, mostly. --Rodhullandemu 12:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your intervention

Hello! Thank you for your block of the editor NewLeadership, who was creating disruptive edits and articles. I was going to list a Level 3 warning when you intervened -- I am glad that you did, as I think that editor would not have paid much heed to additional warnings. Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 18:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Problem User

Hi.

I think you might need to block User:Godalmingyellow because they keep vandalising Joey Beauchamp. I had reverted 3 edits by this user because they had undone reverts by other people (it sounds confusing). I have warned this user on their talk page but they keep blanking it.

Please take a look at this ASAP.

Thanks,

--TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 14:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your swift actions. I don't think this editor understood the rules here. It was quite clear he had no intentions of making constructive edits. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Codewords

That's why we shouldn't use the phrase here to describe our beliefs. I don't know why people feel the need to describe their beliefs, especially if they are so dramatically divisive as "white pride." PouponOnToast (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Would agree that in a multi-cultural environment, some sensitivity and awareness is commendable, but equally, Lara has explained what she means by the term, and if others seek to misinterpret, ignore or extrapolate from that, then it's unhelpful and detrimental to the collegiate atmosphere we try so carefully to encourage here; that's my concern. That's one reason I don't get involved in zOMG draaahmas, because they detract from the mission; there are better things to do here and I think Lara has had enough of it. "Time to move on" is my point. --Rodhullandemu 18:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Julianna Rose Mauriello

Just in case that address is accurate, should we try to get those edits wiped from the article history? RainbowOfLight ^Talk 21:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

800 word prequel

It had sufficent text to it, what else would you add to it? Instead of deleting it why don't you just add to it? The article was better than nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fshoutofdawater (talk • contribs) 21:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Where do I start? It wasn't even a stub, with the best will in the world, it was a poorly-written shed. It had a title that nobody in their right mind would search for, no explanation of what it was or how it fitted into the Harry Potter universe, and no indication of why anyone should care about it. The prequel is an 800-word sketch which at present might deserve a paragraph in the main article but certainly not its own article yet, and that's if the quoted sources supported that, which they didn't. I'll gladly undelete it to your own userspace so it can be turned into something useful, but as things were, it didn't do the encyclopedia any credit. Sorry, but there are some standards here. --Rodhullandemu 21:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Maybe, we are all really hurt by these statements though Rod, very. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Indeed.:(((((Xp54321 ^{(Hello!,Contribs)} 00:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• I fully understand; it's extremely regrettable, but in the whole scheme of things, unlikely to have a long-term effect. It seems to be a misinterpretation of your collective enthusiasm to me, and I've seen enough sockpuppetry to be able to smell it. Here, your editing histories show not only no need, but also no plausibility to sustain such an allegation. But I think it might have been wiser to seek advice before going to WP:ANI. Accusations tend to fly rather freely round here, for one reason and another, and some resilience is good to develop. --Rodhullandemu 00:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
  • It wouldnt bother me if it was some fool saying it, but this is an actual admin who has accused me (and others) of sock puppetry and completely discredited my work. Can I still work/help Kodster without Admins looking over my shoulder? Its not fair and Iris should retract the comments. Because we help each other out, defend one another and give the occasional barnstar we must be socks? Admins shouldn't be allowed to say this, sometimes I think you guys forget how much power your words hold (Your ok though Rod :-)). The fact that he/she has considered blocking us is scary. I cant afford another block Rod, you know that.— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Admins should have no greater say than anyone, really. I know some groups of editors hurl Barnstars around like confetti between themselves, but that happens anywhere such personal awards are available; nothing much should be read into it. Likewise, Admins can be as wrong as anyone, believe me, they're just supposed to know policy, although sometimes you'd wonder. I doubt if blocking you was ever a serious option; I can't possibly see any reason for it. Working together closely might arouse suspicions, but to take it to an allegation of sockpuppetry would need something more cogent and defensible than that. My experience is that if an admin suspects socking but isn't sure, s/he will ask for a second opinion in the Admins' IRC channel or by email. I see no evidence of it, so you've nothing to worry about. Shit happens, as my wife used to say. --Rodhullandemu 00:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Shit does indeed happen, mostly to me though lol. Dont say I haven't made it interesting lol. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 01:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I liked the linking to the copyright decision. Affirmed, indeed. 86.44.27.243 (talk) 02:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Godalmingyellow1

Remember user Godalmingyellow? He's back as Godalmingyellow1 and has undid my revert on the Joey Beauchamp page. This is not allowed. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

user:Godalmingyellow1 blocked indef. Bencherlite^Talk 10:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I missed this. Not even the wit to use a different username. Cuh! --Rodhullandemu 11:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Rendezvous (Sandy Denny album)

On 12 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rendezvous (Sandy Denny album), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

/* Terry Wogan and the Eurovision */

I'd be happy if you allow me to broaden the audience of this discussion. I find you a bit hasty in your judgment and I would appreciate if you had documented yourself before accusing me of vandalism.

You wrote me this:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Terry Wogan. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your reference does not support the article text, and in any case it's a breach of WP:NPOV. --Rodhullandemu 19:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

For example you could first have read the previous comment in my talk and avoid making twice the same comment:

hmm.. I'm not really familiar with this guy, so when you changed that to mean something completely different, I thought you merely vandalizing the article. My apologies. If you have the cite, than by all means change the article to make it accurate. (see this page for info on how to create a citation for Wikipedia) Again, sorry about that. Thingg⊕⊗ 01:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

as well as the Telegraph article I attached previously [2]. Furthermore a bit of googling would have easily provided you with more illustration of my edition from more general newspapers such as this article from timesonline[3]

UKR 12/06/08

• Well, since you haven't signed your comment, I have no idea who you are. And it is not my job to go googling for you. --Rodhullandemu 21:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I apologize if my comments were not clear. But I did not mean for you to google ME, as I am of no importance. I was hoping you would document yourself on the subject, like you acquaintance Thingg did, before deciding that my comments were of no interest. UKR 86.144.98.155 (talk) 21:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.98.155 (talk) 21:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• I didn't see much point in Googling a variably-assigned IP address, because experience tells me that it doesn't tend to work unless you've been visiting sites that for some reason are under law-enforcement surveillance (er, and I am at the time using one of the profession's search engines, which Google is not). What I meant was doing your Googling for you, since it's the responsibility of an editor seeking to add content to provide a source for it. In the case in point, I have left a response here. --Rodhullandemu 22:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I could not agree more with your comment on the need for an editor/censor to act responsibly. What an irony ! By the way, you'd be wise to keep your innuendo away from Wikipedia. UKR, 86.144.98.155 (talk) 19:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

• Whatever. There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, however. --Rodhullandemu 19:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Text on other websites.

Hi

I'm currently working on I Should Coco and want to add a section about the album artwork. I've found some information on a website about the artwork here and want to take that and put it into the article. How can I do that without using a direct copy from that site?

Any help would be good.

Thanks,

--TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Let me know if this reads OK. I tried to paraphrase is but it can always be changed if it needs to be.

--TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 12:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I've now added the inline reference for the quote and I've also added a link in reference section. Like this: I Should Coco Artwork described at Children of the Monkey Basket I'm not sure if that's good or not.. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I've done quite a bit of work on this article now. It's up for Peer review now. Please could you leave some comments on how I can bring it up to GA. Thanks. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 19:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

So that template will work like.. 'charted at number 43 in the UK Singles Chart Template:UKChartHits' ? I don't understand where to put it. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining that. I've added chart references now. It just needs proofreading and any other corrections and the Peer Review. I want to make sure it's all fine before submitting for GA. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism referring to you

Are you aware of vandalism that appeared on "University Challenge" which referred to you? See this diff: [4]. I've reverted it. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 14:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Also this: [5]. It appears that Gracers and Cool-dude41 are sock-puppets of the same disruptive user. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 14:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

United World Chart

Regarding the deletion of that as a source and the community consensus that its unreliable (see the beatles talk page for more details). Is there a way to get the site banned as spam or something. The source is unreliable yet new editors, IPS and Fan boys will continue to add it. I purged all my articles of it. Apparantly the site is used in well over 1000 articles. Thoughts? — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 17:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Fun

Looks like you're in for a LONG evening! ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 21:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

On Desperate Dan

I have no intention to vandalize the Desperate Dan page. I am sorry if you see it that way - I was only trying to rephrase a sentence I found awkward. If you prefer it the way it is, that's fine, though. 66.63.86.156 (talk) 00:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler

Hi Rodhull, I agree that User:Cretino's edit to Adolf Hitler isn't constructive and clearly violates WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. However, I don't believe the quotations are fabrications. The Chiurchill quote is certainly real: [6]. I'm pretty sure the Lloyd George quote is also genuine. Gwernol 01:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Review

I dont suppose you could conduct a review of my latest nomination Feedback (song)? Its modern and hip, im not sure if its the sort of thing your used to reviewing. Its been up a while on the list and everyone seems to have their hands full with other reviews. If you would rather pass up the offer its not a problem, just send me a message. Cheers Rod. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 09:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanx for getting back to me. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 18:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

It was twenty years ago today

Hey, I started a discussion at the Sgt. Pepper's talk page regarding non-notable and trivial stuff we can remove from the article. Hopefully we can build a consensus; thanks indopug (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Let it Be

I've restored this redirect which you had deleted as R1 on the grounds that it didn't qualify as R1 and that it broke a number of links. Also, you mentioned that it should redirect to the album in your deletion summary. If this is how you felt you should have changed the target, rather than delete. In this case the page already had a revision where it redirected to the album. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 23:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Well looking at all the links to the redirect, the intention is kind of split between the album and song. But it should redirect to Let It Be (which happens to be the album) because it's a lowercase version of that title. Anyways, I went ahead and fixed all the links that intended to lead to the song. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 23:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 24	9 June 2008	About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hitler

I have added references. If you want move the quotation to Adolf Hitler's religious beliefs. --Esimal (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think the quotation here should be expanded. I'm going to do it. --Esimal (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

New editer

User:CrystalMares91 - I think this guy is making fake articles, he seems to be copying the singles discography of MJ and Britney spears for an unheard of singer. Regards. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 21:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, im quite sure it was fake or some sort of parody. Thanx very much lol. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 21:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Justin Lee Collins BDO International Open

Good Evening/Morning whichever you prefer.

I see you requested citation to be required for my edit on Justin Lee Collins' appearence on the BDO International Open yesterday. Well I could go ahead and post the entire draw sheet for the event that bears his name on group 4, or perhaps wait for the BDO/WDF (who organised the event) Setanta Sports (who showed the event live and interviewed him after his defeat) or JLC himself (via website, blog etc) to mention something and then use that as a reference. I just thought I'd come forward with what I know from memory rather than be accused (not by you but a bot of some sorts) of vandilism. Rest assure, the edit is legit and as soon as a ref becomes availible, I'll be sure to put it up on the section and keep the ball rolling. We part until then. Good night. Raphie (talk) 02:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

77.102.144.25

Hey Rodhullandemu. You have a message at User talk:77.102.144.25 *rolleyes*. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 14:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, do you think User talk:212.139.113.218 might be a sock (which I've tagged as such for the time being?) ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 15:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Tocino

What should we do about this fanatic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.134.65.233 (talk) 17:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Please answer my question!84.134.118.194 (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

You know, if I had some spare time not dealing with you, I'd be able to answer that. --Rodhullandemu 18:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

84.134.126.213

Who is this an IP sock of? I believe I encountered another one earlier today, but didn't block it. Acalamari 18:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Funnily enough, I just blocked another one of his socks just now. Acalamari 18:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

kraid117

Um, why did you say I was vandalizing, Hitlers real name is Adolf Elizabeth Hitler. Pleese take it back and thank you.