User talk:Kgrr
| This is Kgrr's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
] }}
Welcome!
Hello, Kgrr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
- How to edit a page and write a great article
- The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
- The handy Manual of Style
- And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
-- Sango123 00:54, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Nothing works using your dog
test
test
Could you please
add
 | This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. |
before all your "waterfall" articles?
Hi Kgrr, I updated the SvL article to describe his contribution to the ORG paper better - actually the description in the article as I found it was wrong anyway so my earlier update (the straw man) was misguided. No-one seriously interested in the subject claims that there are no other energy inputs to nuclear power, which in todays society means that it carries a greenhouse gas emission on its lifecycle; the discussion is about how much that is (which is why attacking "zero emissions" would be a straw man argument). The SvL/S analysis is an extreme (high) outlier in that estimation. In the ORG paper itself, SvL's claim that in thirty or fifty years the greenhouse burden for nuclear will suddenly sky-rocket assumes no new uranium discoveries and ignores ISL methods, both of which are too important to overlook.
I should add that I don't care whether Storm van Leeuwen is alive or not (yes I know he is); I am addressing the arguments, not the man.
Regards, Joffan (talk) 22:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough.Kgrr (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Large masses
They're working. The new codes are:
e3lbe6lbe9lbe12lbkilotonneMt
The kilotonne code is just a filler whilst kt is being swapped over. I except it'll be deleted in time. JIMp talk·cont 19:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I've added the "nowiki" tags around the categories on the page, as the page was being indexed with regular articles. We don't want non-editor users to run across the messy back-end bits of Wikipedia. :) ~Kylu (u|t) 01:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
North German lowlands
You would be correct. Ich editierte einige Seiten für ganz eine Weile heute, so könnte ich einige Wörter besonders in diesem Artikel verpasst haben. That was the last one I did. Also, as I was translating it, I noticed that when translated it just did not make any sense what so ever in some places. So those particular paragraphs were left out. If I remember right it was one in the North German Lowlands article. Whoever made the article and how it was maintained on the German site was questionable at best. I did clean it up quite a bit as I went. I am going to look for websites and articles today. Thank you again for correcting my dumb mistake. That one was an obvious one I shouldn't have over looked =). Also, if you have any particular German articles that you would like to see translated, please tell me as I am kinda just sifting through them right now and translating the ones that don't have an English translation. Also, I am fairly new to wikipedia and have a heavy interest in translating articles. While I have found some very useful information. I still have a few questions. Why do my templates that I insert into the pages I create show as a link instead of the pretty table that I attempted to make? You answered my research question w/o knowing it =). Thank you. But I still have a few minor questions that would help being answered so I can improve my quality of contributions. Thank you again!! Cbreseman (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2008 (UTC)