Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL2 Interactive
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman (talk | contribs) at 17:13, 29 June 2008 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- FL2 Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I would keep an eye on this for a few days... as it stands now its a CSD but it could be legit if more external sources and other stuff keeps get added to it to meet WP:CORP. I dont want to CSD it just yet so I'm opening an AFD for this article. Katanada (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not trying to spam but... What would you suggest? I tried to model this after what Crispin Porter & Bogusky has done and their section is approved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FormIsEmpty (talk • contribs) 16:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:COMPANY. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unfortunately, the sources added since the afd was create do not do anything to establish notability. The adobe link is because the company uses adobe products. The webby awards link is for their clients.--Finalnight (talk) 00:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No Delete Seems like the Adobe link is reference to an award they won. Not about products. The Webby Award, if you went down the page referenced the two sites which had won the award.
- Precedence Modernista.com is using wikipedia as their actual homepage - used strictly as a marketing piece. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.166.43.146 (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.