Talk:Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat.

Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat. has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 8, 2008.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Slipknot (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slipknot, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SlipknotWikipedia:WikiProject SlipknotTemplate:WikiProject SlipknotSlipknot

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

This article was a past Slipknot Article of Focus! You can view the current article of focus, or view other past articles of focus.

Archives

Archive One: pre → July 2008

Requested move

User:Dude527 recently removed the period after "Repeat" in the title, saying he "corrected the title." Is there a source for this? Amazon, Opium of the People, and MFKR1 lists it with a period, Allmusic lists it without. It is contested that all of the sources are "reliable", but I would like to know what the album says, anyone? Black ngold29 01:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have the re-issue of it and it has the period at the end of Repeat. See here [1] that is a scan of the back inlay for the CD and you can clearly see it has the period. REZTER ^TALK ø 17:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I requested this to be moved due to the fact that there is a redirect currently at the name I'm trying to mvoe it to per the album cover art. So it's clear that it's been moved before. REZTER ^TALK ø 14:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I should make it clear that I requested the page to be moved to Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat. which includes spaces because the title does include spaces REZTER ^TALK ø 19:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Slip

Personnel

Do we really need all that information in the personnel section. Specifically what I'm talking about for example is things like "cover photo concept, cover photo cage, middle panel". Granted all these are credited for in the album booklet, it's just that section is just so messy and those things look way out of place. REZTER ^TALK ø 17:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we need it. Just the instumentalists, vocals and stuff like producer, mixer, etc. It's too cluttered and overwhelming (like track listing for Slipknot (album) used to be. Black ngold29 17:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wording

In the statement, "...release party at the Safari...". Is it "The Safari" or just "Safari"? If "the" is part of the club's title it should be capitolized, if not it should read "party at Safari". Black ngold29 02:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The statement "The most significant example of this is evidenced by the band's third studio album..." seems kind of odd to me. As a fan, I easily understand this, but a GA reviewer will probably require a source. It might be alright if we just took out "most significant", and just say "An example of this..." Black ngold29 02:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Should we include a reception of the album? AllMusic has a review, although beyond that finding additional sources would probably be difficult. Though with searching I could probably find something. Black ngold29 02:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well try looking for some sources if you find enough I guess we could do one. REZTER ^TALK ø 09:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only good source that we have for a Reception section is AMG and it's a retrospective review... I really don't think that we are in a position to write anything about this because it wasn't really released per say. REZTER ^TALK ø 17:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

"1000 copies." → "1,000 copies." per MOS:NUM
- Done
En dashes for page ranges in the references per WP:DASH
- Done
Publishers are required for references per WP:CITE/ES
- Done
Why no Reception section?
- I wouldn't think 1,000 copy demos would usually have too many reviews. Allmusic has one and I think there might be one more that we found, but not enough to pull from for an entire section. Black ngold29 04:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  Yeah, good point :| Gary King (talk) 04:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary King (talk) 04:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty short article, but everything seems in order. Passing! Gary King (talk) 04:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]