Wikipedia talk:Taboo
Policy or essay?
Is this intended to be a policy or an essay? As a policy, it has an uncountable number of pitfalls - not the least of which is differences in cultural mores and the need for a global perspective. What is considered taboo varies enormously between cultures, so what makes the list? Only Western taboo subjects?
On the other hand, its clear that there should be a codification of the unwritten policy that pro-pedophilia advocates, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, etc. are to an extent "blocked on identification." At the moment pedophiles are blocked following a still not widely known ArbCom decision, and the others are inevitably blocked following a contentious discussion on an admin noticeboard. It makes sense to clarify those situations with a consensus-driven policy. Avruch T 19:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- The other thing is that perhaps WP:TABOO should be a redirect to something like "Controversial subjects" - "Taboo topics" - "Editors with taboo views" etc. Avruch T 19:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)